Cargando…
Remotely-sensed productivity clusters capture global biodiversity patterns
Ecological regionalisations delineate areas of similar environmental conditions, ecological processes, and biotic communities, and provide a basis for systematic conservation planning and management. Most regionalisations are made based on subjective criteria, and can not be readily revised, leading...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30389971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34162-8 |
_version_ | 1783368059729215488 |
---|---|
author | Coops, Nicholas C. Kearney, Sean P. Bolton, Douglas K. Radeloff, Volker C. |
author_facet | Coops, Nicholas C. Kearney, Sean P. Bolton, Douglas K. Radeloff, Volker C. |
author_sort | Coops, Nicholas C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ecological regionalisations delineate areas of similar environmental conditions, ecological processes, and biotic communities, and provide a basis for systematic conservation planning and management. Most regionalisations are made based on subjective criteria, and can not be readily revised, leading to outstanding questions with respect to how to optimally develop and define them. Advances in remote sensing technology, and big data analysis approaches, provide new opportunities for regionalisations, especially in terms of productivity patterns through both photosynthesis and structural surrogates. Here we show that global terrestrial productivity dynamics can be captured by Dynamics Habitat Indices (DHIs) and we conduct a regionalisation based on the DHIs using a two-stage multivariate clustering approach. Encouragingly, the derived clusters are more homogeneous in terms of species richness of three key taxa, and of canopy height, than a conventional regionalisation. We conclude with discussing the benefits of these remotely derived clusters for biodiversity assessments and conservation. The clusters based on the DHIs explained more variance, and greater within-region homogeneity, compared to conventional regionalisations for species richness of both amphibians and mammals, and were comparable in the case of birds. Structure as defined by global tree height was also better defined by productivity driven clusters than conventional regionalisations. These results suggest that ecological regionalisations based on remotely sensed metrics have clear advantages over conventional regionalisations for certain applications, and they are also more easily updated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6215014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62150142018-11-06 Remotely-sensed productivity clusters capture global biodiversity patterns Coops, Nicholas C. Kearney, Sean P. Bolton, Douglas K. Radeloff, Volker C. Sci Rep Article Ecological regionalisations delineate areas of similar environmental conditions, ecological processes, and biotic communities, and provide a basis for systematic conservation planning and management. Most regionalisations are made based on subjective criteria, and can not be readily revised, leading to outstanding questions with respect to how to optimally develop and define them. Advances in remote sensing technology, and big data analysis approaches, provide new opportunities for regionalisations, especially in terms of productivity patterns through both photosynthesis and structural surrogates. Here we show that global terrestrial productivity dynamics can be captured by Dynamics Habitat Indices (DHIs) and we conduct a regionalisation based on the DHIs using a two-stage multivariate clustering approach. Encouragingly, the derived clusters are more homogeneous in terms of species richness of three key taxa, and of canopy height, than a conventional regionalisation. We conclude with discussing the benefits of these remotely derived clusters for biodiversity assessments and conservation. The clusters based on the DHIs explained more variance, and greater within-region homogeneity, compared to conventional regionalisations for species richness of both amphibians and mammals, and were comparable in the case of birds. Structure as defined by global tree height was also better defined by productivity driven clusters than conventional regionalisations. These results suggest that ecological regionalisations based on remotely sensed metrics have clear advantages over conventional regionalisations for certain applications, and they are also more easily updated. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6215014/ /pubmed/30389971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34162-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Coops, Nicholas C. Kearney, Sean P. Bolton, Douglas K. Radeloff, Volker C. Remotely-sensed productivity clusters capture global biodiversity patterns |
title | Remotely-sensed productivity clusters capture global biodiversity patterns |
title_full | Remotely-sensed productivity clusters capture global biodiversity patterns |
title_fullStr | Remotely-sensed productivity clusters capture global biodiversity patterns |
title_full_unstemmed | Remotely-sensed productivity clusters capture global biodiversity patterns |
title_short | Remotely-sensed productivity clusters capture global biodiversity patterns |
title_sort | remotely-sensed productivity clusters capture global biodiversity patterns |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30389971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34162-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coopsnicholasc remotelysensedproductivityclusterscaptureglobalbiodiversitypatterns AT kearneyseanp remotelysensedproductivityclusterscaptureglobalbiodiversitypatterns AT boltondouglask remotelysensedproductivityclusterscaptureglobalbiodiversitypatterns AT radeloffvolkerc remotelysensedproductivityclusterscaptureglobalbiodiversitypatterns |