Cargando…

Comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery, angioplasty, or medical therapy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: MASS II trial

BACKGROUND: The costs for treating coronary artery disease (CAD) are high worldwide. We performed a prespecified analyses of cost-effectiveness of three therapeutic strategies for multivessel CAD. METHODS: From May 1995 to May 2000, a total of 611 patients were randomly assigned to coronary artery b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brandão, Sara Michelly Gonçalves, Rezende, Paulo Cury, Rocca, Hans-Peter Brunner-La, Ju, Yang Ting, de Lima, Antonio Carlos Pedroso, Takiuti, Myrthes Emy, Hueb, Whady, Bocchi, Edimar Alcides
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0158-z
_version_ 1783368185361203200
author Brandão, Sara Michelly Gonçalves
Rezende, Paulo Cury
Rocca, Hans-Peter Brunner-La
Ju, Yang Ting
de Lima, Antonio Carlos Pedroso
Takiuti, Myrthes Emy
Hueb, Whady
Bocchi, Edimar Alcides
author_facet Brandão, Sara Michelly Gonçalves
Rezende, Paulo Cury
Rocca, Hans-Peter Brunner-La
Ju, Yang Ting
de Lima, Antonio Carlos Pedroso
Takiuti, Myrthes Emy
Hueb, Whady
Bocchi, Edimar Alcides
author_sort Brandão, Sara Michelly Gonçalves
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The costs for treating coronary artery disease (CAD) are high worldwide. We performed a prespecified analyses of cost-effectiveness of three therapeutic strategies for multivessel CAD. METHODS: From May 1995 to May 2000, a total of 611 patients were randomly assigned to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), n = 203; percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), n = 205; or medical treatment (MT), n = 203. This cost analysis study was based on the perspective of the Public Health Care System. Initial procedural and follow-up costs for medications, cardiology examinations, and hospitalizations for complications were calculated after randomization. Life-years and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used as effectiveness measures. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were obtained by using nonparametric bootstrapping methods with 5000 resamples. RESULTS: Initial procedural costs were lower for MT. However, the subsequent 5-year cumulative costs were lower for CABG. Compared with baseline, the three treatment options produced significant improvements in QALYs. After 5 years, PCI and CABG had better QALYs results compared with MT. The ICER results favored CABG and PCI, and favored PCI over CABG in 61% of the drawings. On the other hand, sensitivity analysis showed MT as the preferred therapy compared with CABG and PCI, in the analysis considering higher costs. CONCLUSIONS: At 5-year follow-up, the three treatment options yielded improvements in quality of life, with comparable and acceptable costs. However, despite higher initial costs, the comparison of cost-effectiveness after 5 years of follow-up among the three treatments showed both interventions (CABG and PCI) to be cost-effective strategies compared with MT. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN66068876, Registered 06/10/1994, http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN66068876 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0158-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6215652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62156522018-11-08 Comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery, angioplasty, or medical therapy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: MASS II trial Brandão, Sara Michelly Gonçalves Rezende, Paulo Cury Rocca, Hans-Peter Brunner-La Ju, Yang Ting de Lima, Antonio Carlos Pedroso Takiuti, Myrthes Emy Hueb, Whady Bocchi, Edimar Alcides Cost Eff Resour Alloc Review BACKGROUND: The costs for treating coronary artery disease (CAD) are high worldwide. We performed a prespecified analyses of cost-effectiveness of three therapeutic strategies for multivessel CAD. METHODS: From May 1995 to May 2000, a total of 611 patients were randomly assigned to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), n = 203; percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), n = 205; or medical treatment (MT), n = 203. This cost analysis study was based on the perspective of the Public Health Care System. Initial procedural and follow-up costs for medications, cardiology examinations, and hospitalizations for complications were calculated after randomization. Life-years and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were used as effectiveness measures. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were obtained by using nonparametric bootstrapping methods with 5000 resamples. RESULTS: Initial procedural costs were lower for MT. However, the subsequent 5-year cumulative costs were lower for CABG. Compared with baseline, the three treatment options produced significant improvements in QALYs. After 5 years, PCI and CABG had better QALYs results compared with MT. The ICER results favored CABG and PCI, and favored PCI over CABG in 61% of the drawings. On the other hand, sensitivity analysis showed MT as the preferred therapy compared with CABG and PCI, in the analysis considering higher costs. CONCLUSIONS: At 5-year follow-up, the three treatment options yielded improvements in quality of life, with comparable and acceptable costs. However, despite higher initial costs, the comparison of cost-effectiveness after 5 years of follow-up among the three treatments showed both interventions (CABG and PCI) to be cost-effective strategies compared with MT. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN66068876, Registered 06/10/1994, http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN66068876 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12962-018-0158-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6215652/ /pubmed/30410425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0158-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Brandão, Sara Michelly Gonçalves
Rezende, Paulo Cury
Rocca, Hans-Peter Brunner-La
Ju, Yang Ting
de Lima, Antonio Carlos Pedroso
Takiuti, Myrthes Emy
Hueb, Whady
Bocchi, Edimar Alcides
Comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery, angioplasty, or medical therapy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: MASS II trial
title Comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery, angioplasty, or medical therapy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: MASS II trial
title_full Comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery, angioplasty, or medical therapy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: MASS II trial
title_fullStr Comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery, angioplasty, or medical therapy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: MASS II trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery, angioplasty, or medical therapy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: MASS II trial
title_short Comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery, angioplasty, or medical therapy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: MASS II trial
title_sort comparative cost-effectiveness of surgery, angioplasty, or medical therapy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: mass ii trial
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0158-z
work_keys_str_mv AT brandaosaramichellygoncalves comparativecosteffectivenessofsurgeryangioplastyormedicaltherapyinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseasemassiitrial
AT rezendepaulocury comparativecosteffectivenessofsurgeryangioplastyormedicaltherapyinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseasemassiitrial
AT roccahanspeterbrunnerla comparativecosteffectivenessofsurgeryangioplastyormedicaltherapyinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseasemassiitrial
AT juyangting comparativecosteffectivenessofsurgeryangioplastyormedicaltherapyinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseasemassiitrial
AT delimaantoniocarlospedroso comparativecosteffectivenessofsurgeryangioplastyormedicaltherapyinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseasemassiitrial
AT takiutimyrthesemy comparativecosteffectivenessofsurgeryangioplastyormedicaltherapyinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseasemassiitrial
AT huebwhady comparativecosteffectivenessofsurgeryangioplastyormedicaltherapyinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseasemassiitrial
AT bocchiedimaralcides comparativecosteffectivenessofsurgeryangioplastyormedicaltherapyinpatientswithmultivesselcoronaryarterydiseasemassiitrial