Cargando…

A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination

Until the mid-1950s, it was believed that genetic crossovers did not occur within genes. Crossovers occurred between genes, the “beads on a string” model. Then in 1956, Seymour Benzer published his classic paper describing crossing over within a gene, intragenic recombination. This result from a bac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okagaki, Ron J., Dukowic-Schulze, Stefanie, Eggleston, William B., Muehlbauer, Gary J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01560
_version_ 1783368223007178752
author Okagaki, Ron J.
Dukowic-Schulze, Stefanie
Eggleston, William B.
Muehlbauer, Gary J.
author_facet Okagaki, Ron J.
Dukowic-Schulze, Stefanie
Eggleston, William B.
Muehlbauer, Gary J.
author_sort Okagaki, Ron J.
collection PubMed
description Until the mid-1950s, it was believed that genetic crossovers did not occur within genes. Crossovers occurred between genes, the “beads on a string” model. Then in 1956, Seymour Benzer published his classic paper describing crossing over within a gene, intragenic recombination. This result from a bacteriophage gene prompted Oliver Nelson to study intragenic recombination in the maize Waxy locus. His studies along with subsequent work by others working with maize and other organisms described the outcomes of intragenic recombination and provided some of the earliest evidence that genes, not intergenic regions, were recombination hotspots. High-throughput genotyping approaches have since replaced single gene intragenic studies for characterizing the outcomes of recombination. These large-scale studies confirm that genes, or more generally genic regions, are the most active recombinogenic regions, and suggested a pattern of crossovers similar to the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In S. cerevisiae recombination is initiated by double-strand breaks (DSBs) near transcription start sites (TSSs) of genes producing a polarity gradient where crossovers preferentially resolve at the 5′ end of genes. Intragenic studies in maize yielded less evidence for either polarity or for DSBs near TSSs initiating recombination and in certain respects resembled Schizosaccharomyces pombe or mouse. These different perspectives highlight the need to draw upon the strengths of different approaches and caution against relying on a single model system or approach for understanding recombination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6215864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62158642018-11-12 A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination Okagaki, Ron J. Dukowic-Schulze, Stefanie Eggleston, William B. Muehlbauer, Gary J. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Until the mid-1950s, it was believed that genetic crossovers did not occur within genes. Crossovers occurred between genes, the “beads on a string” model. Then in 1956, Seymour Benzer published his classic paper describing crossing over within a gene, intragenic recombination. This result from a bacteriophage gene prompted Oliver Nelson to study intragenic recombination in the maize Waxy locus. His studies along with subsequent work by others working with maize and other organisms described the outcomes of intragenic recombination and provided some of the earliest evidence that genes, not intergenic regions, were recombination hotspots. High-throughput genotyping approaches have since replaced single gene intragenic studies for characterizing the outcomes of recombination. These large-scale studies confirm that genes, or more generally genic regions, are the most active recombinogenic regions, and suggested a pattern of crossovers similar to the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In S. cerevisiae recombination is initiated by double-strand breaks (DSBs) near transcription start sites (TSSs) of genes producing a polarity gradient where crossovers preferentially resolve at the 5′ end of genes. Intragenic studies in maize yielded less evidence for either polarity or for DSBs near TSSs initiating recombination and in certain respects resembled Schizosaccharomyces pombe or mouse. These different perspectives highlight the need to draw upon the strengths of different approaches and caution against relying on a single model system or approach for understanding recombination. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6215864/ /pubmed/30420864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01560 Text en Copyright © 2018 Okagaki, Dukowic-Schulze, Eggleston and Muehlbauer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Okagaki, Ron J.
Dukowic-Schulze, Stefanie
Eggleston, William B.
Muehlbauer, Gary J.
A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination
title A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination
title_full A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination
title_fullStr A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination
title_full_unstemmed A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination
title_short A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination
title_sort critical assessment of 60 years of maize intragenic recombination
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420864
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01560
work_keys_str_mv AT okagakironj acriticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination
AT dukowicschulzestefanie acriticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination
AT egglestonwilliamb acriticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination
AT muehlbauergaryj acriticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination
AT okagakironj criticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination
AT dukowicschulzestefanie criticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination
AT egglestonwilliamb criticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination
AT muehlbauergaryj criticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination