Cargando…
A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination
Until the mid-1950s, it was believed that genetic crossovers did not occur within genes. Crossovers occurred between genes, the “beads on a string” model. Then in 1956, Seymour Benzer published his classic paper describing crossing over within a gene, intragenic recombination. This result from a bac...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01560 |
_version_ | 1783368223007178752 |
---|---|
author | Okagaki, Ron J. Dukowic-Schulze, Stefanie Eggleston, William B. Muehlbauer, Gary J. |
author_facet | Okagaki, Ron J. Dukowic-Schulze, Stefanie Eggleston, William B. Muehlbauer, Gary J. |
author_sort | Okagaki, Ron J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Until the mid-1950s, it was believed that genetic crossovers did not occur within genes. Crossovers occurred between genes, the “beads on a string” model. Then in 1956, Seymour Benzer published his classic paper describing crossing over within a gene, intragenic recombination. This result from a bacteriophage gene prompted Oliver Nelson to study intragenic recombination in the maize Waxy locus. His studies along with subsequent work by others working with maize and other organisms described the outcomes of intragenic recombination and provided some of the earliest evidence that genes, not intergenic regions, were recombination hotspots. High-throughput genotyping approaches have since replaced single gene intragenic studies for characterizing the outcomes of recombination. These large-scale studies confirm that genes, or more generally genic regions, are the most active recombinogenic regions, and suggested a pattern of crossovers similar to the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In S. cerevisiae recombination is initiated by double-strand breaks (DSBs) near transcription start sites (TSSs) of genes producing a polarity gradient where crossovers preferentially resolve at the 5′ end of genes. Intragenic studies in maize yielded less evidence for either polarity or for DSBs near TSSs initiating recombination and in certain respects resembled Schizosaccharomyces pombe or mouse. These different perspectives highlight the need to draw upon the strengths of different approaches and caution against relying on a single model system or approach for understanding recombination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6215864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62158642018-11-12 A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination Okagaki, Ron J. Dukowic-Schulze, Stefanie Eggleston, William B. Muehlbauer, Gary J. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Until the mid-1950s, it was believed that genetic crossovers did not occur within genes. Crossovers occurred between genes, the “beads on a string” model. Then in 1956, Seymour Benzer published his classic paper describing crossing over within a gene, intragenic recombination. This result from a bacteriophage gene prompted Oliver Nelson to study intragenic recombination in the maize Waxy locus. His studies along with subsequent work by others working with maize and other organisms described the outcomes of intragenic recombination and provided some of the earliest evidence that genes, not intergenic regions, were recombination hotspots. High-throughput genotyping approaches have since replaced single gene intragenic studies for characterizing the outcomes of recombination. These large-scale studies confirm that genes, or more generally genic regions, are the most active recombinogenic regions, and suggested a pattern of crossovers similar to the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In S. cerevisiae recombination is initiated by double-strand breaks (DSBs) near transcription start sites (TSSs) of genes producing a polarity gradient where crossovers preferentially resolve at the 5′ end of genes. Intragenic studies in maize yielded less evidence for either polarity or for DSBs near TSSs initiating recombination and in certain respects resembled Schizosaccharomyces pombe or mouse. These different perspectives highlight the need to draw upon the strengths of different approaches and caution against relying on a single model system or approach for understanding recombination. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6215864/ /pubmed/30420864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01560 Text en Copyright © 2018 Okagaki, Dukowic-Schulze, Eggleston and Muehlbauer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Okagaki, Ron J. Dukowic-Schulze, Stefanie Eggleston, William B. Muehlbauer, Gary J. A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination |
title | A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination |
title_full | A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination |
title_fullStr | A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination |
title_full_unstemmed | A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination |
title_short | A Critical Assessment of 60 Years of Maize Intragenic Recombination |
title_sort | critical assessment of 60 years of maize intragenic recombination |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420864 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01560 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okagakironj acriticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination AT dukowicschulzestefanie acriticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination AT egglestonwilliamb acriticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination AT muehlbauergaryj acriticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination AT okagakironj criticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination AT dukowicschulzestefanie criticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination AT egglestonwilliamb criticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination AT muehlbauergaryj criticalassessmentof60yearsofmaizeintragenicrecombination |