Cargando…

30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator?

Systemic treatment is the standard treatment for unresectable stage III and IV lung cancer. Nevertheless, a 5–10% death rate has been described within 30 days after the last systemic treatment, suggesting that these patient did not benefit. We analysed the 30-day mortality after start of systemic th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burgers, Jacobus Adrianus, Damhuis, Ronald Alphons
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00030-2018
_version_ 1783368233641836544
author Burgers, Jacobus Adrianus
Damhuis, Ronald Alphons
author_facet Burgers, Jacobus Adrianus
Damhuis, Ronald Alphons
author_sort Burgers, Jacobus Adrianus
collection PubMed
description Systemic treatment is the standard treatment for unresectable stage III and IV lung cancer. Nevertheless, a 5–10% death rate has been described within 30 days after the last systemic treatment, suggesting that these patient did not benefit. We analysed the 30-day mortality after start of systemic therapy. Data were retrieved from the Netherlands National Cancer Registry. From 2010 to 2015, 26 277 patients were included. 56% were men. The median age was 65 years and 31% of patients were aged ≥70 years. 27% involved small cell lung cancer and 73% nonsmall cell lung cancer. Overall mortality within 30 days after the start of systemic treatment was 6.2%. Multivariable analysis established the prognostic influence of age, histology, number of metastatic sites and type of systemic treatment. Chemotherapy was administered in 77 hospitals, treating each 15–161 lung cancer patients with systemic therapy annually. None of the hospitals had a significantly higher 30-day mortality according to hierarchical multivariable analysis, controlling for case-mix. In the Netherlands, the 30-day mortality rate after start of systemic therapy for lung cancer patients was comparable with earlier reports. Hospital volume did not influence the 30-day mortality rate. 30-day mortality rate is not a meaningful indicator to monitor quality of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6215912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62159122018-11-07 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator? Burgers, Jacobus Adrianus Damhuis, Ronald Alphons ERJ Open Res Original Articles Systemic treatment is the standard treatment for unresectable stage III and IV lung cancer. Nevertheless, a 5–10% death rate has been described within 30 days after the last systemic treatment, suggesting that these patient did not benefit. We analysed the 30-day mortality after start of systemic therapy. Data were retrieved from the Netherlands National Cancer Registry. From 2010 to 2015, 26 277 patients were included. 56% were men. The median age was 65 years and 31% of patients were aged ≥70 years. 27% involved small cell lung cancer and 73% nonsmall cell lung cancer. Overall mortality within 30 days after the start of systemic treatment was 6.2%. Multivariable analysis established the prognostic influence of age, histology, number of metastatic sites and type of systemic treatment. Chemotherapy was administered in 77 hospitals, treating each 15–161 lung cancer patients with systemic therapy annually. None of the hospitals had a significantly higher 30-day mortality according to hierarchical multivariable analysis, controlling for case-mix. In the Netherlands, the 30-day mortality rate after start of systemic therapy for lung cancer patients was comparable with earlier reports. Hospital volume did not influence the 30-day mortality rate. 30-day mortality rate is not a meaningful indicator to monitor quality of care. European Respiratory Society 2018-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6215912/ /pubmed/30406123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00030-2018 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Burgers, Jacobus Adrianus
Damhuis, Ronald Alphons
30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator?
title 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator?
title_full 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator?
title_fullStr 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator?
title_full_unstemmed 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator?
title_short 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator?
title_sort 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00030-2018
work_keys_str_mv AT burgersjacobusadrianus 30daymortalityafterthestartofsystemicanticancertherapyforlungcancerisitreallyausefulperformanceindicator
AT damhuisronaldalphons 30daymortalityafterthestartofsystemicanticancertherapyforlungcancerisitreallyausefulperformanceindicator