Cargando…
30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator?
Systemic treatment is the standard treatment for unresectable stage III and IV lung cancer. Nevertheless, a 5–10% death rate has been described within 30 days after the last systemic treatment, suggesting that these patient did not benefit. We analysed the 30-day mortality after start of systemic th...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00030-2018 |
_version_ | 1783368233641836544 |
---|---|
author | Burgers, Jacobus Adrianus Damhuis, Ronald Alphons |
author_facet | Burgers, Jacobus Adrianus Damhuis, Ronald Alphons |
author_sort | Burgers, Jacobus Adrianus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Systemic treatment is the standard treatment for unresectable stage III and IV lung cancer. Nevertheless, a 5–10% death rate has been described within 30 days after the last systemic treatment, suggesting that these patient did not benefit. We analysed the 30-day mortality after start of systemic therapy. Data were retrieved from the Netherlands National Cancer Registry. From 2010 to 2015, 26 277 patients were included. 56% were men. The median age was 65 years and 31% of patients were aged ≥70 years. 27% involved small cell lung cancer and 73% nonsmall cell lung cancer. Overall mortality within 30 days after the start of systemic treatment was 6.2%. Multivariable analysis established the prognostic influence of age, histology, number of metastatic sites and type of systemic treatment. Chemotherapy was administered in 77 hospitals, treating each 15–161 lung cancer patients with systemic therapy annually. None of the hospitals had a significantly higher 30-day mortality according to hierarchical multivariable analysis, controlling for case-mix. In the Netherlands, the 30-day mortality rate after start of systemic therapy for lung cancer patients was comparable with earlier reports. Hospital volume did not influence the 30-day mortality rate. 30-day mortality rate is not a meaningful indicator to monitor quality of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6215912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62159122018-11-07 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator? Burgers, Jacobus Adrianus Damhuis, Ronald Alphons ERJ Open Res Original Articles Systemic treatment is the standard treatment for unresectable stage III and IV lung cancer. Nevertheless, a 5–10% death rate has been described within 30 days after the last systemic treatment, suggesting that these patient did not benefit. We analysed the 30-day mortality after start of systemic therapy. Data were retrieved from the Netherlands National Cancer Registry. From 2010 to 2015, 26 277 patients were included. 56% were men. The median age was 65 years and 31% of patients were aged ≥70 years. 27% involved small cell lung cancer and 73% nonsmall cell lung cancer. Overall mortality within 30 days after the start of systemic treatment was 6.2%. Multivariable analysis established the prognostic influence of age, histology, number of metastatic sites and type of systemic treatment. Chemotherapy was administered in 77 hospitals, treating each 15–161 lung cancer patients with systemic therapy annually. None of the hospitals had a significantly higher 30-day mortality according to hierarchical multivariable analysis, controlling for case-mix. In the Netherlands, the 30-day mortality rate after start of systemic therapy for lung cancer patients was comparable with earlier reports. Hospital volume did not influence the 30-day mortality rate. 30-day mortality rate is not a meaningful indicator to monitor quality of care. European Respiratory Society 2018-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6215912/ /pubmed/30406123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00030-2018 Text en Copyright ©ERS 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Burgers, Jacobus Adrianus Damhuis, Ronald Alphons 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator? |
title | 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator? |
title_full | 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator? |
title_fullStr | 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator? |
title_full_unstemmed | 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator? |
title_short | 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator? |
title_sort | 30-day mortality after the start of systemic anticancer therapy for lung cancer: is it really a useful performance indicator? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30406123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00030-2018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burgersjacobusadrianus 30daymortalityafterthestartofsystemicanticancertherapyforlungcancerisitreallyausefulperformanceindicator AT damhuisronaldalphons 30daymortalityafterthestartofsystemicanticancertherapyforlungcancerisitreallyausefulperformanceindicator |