Cargando…

Comparison of Osteoporosis Pharmacotherapy Fracture Rates: Analysis of a MarketScan(®) Claims Database Cohort

BACKGROUND: Several different classes of medications have been shown to be efficacious at preventing fractures in patients with osteoporosis. No study has compared real world efficacy at preventing fractures between all currently approved medications. OBJECTIVES: To directly compare the efficacy of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reynolds, Alan W, Liu, Guodong, Kocis, Paul T, Skowronski, Jenna N, Leslie, Douglas L, Fox, Edward J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6216103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464768
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ijem.12104
_version_ 1783368281844875264
author Reynolds, Alan W
Liu, Guodong
Kocis, Paul T
Skowronski, Jenna N
Leslie, Douglas L
Fox, Edward J
author_facet Reynolds, Alan W
Liu, Guodong
Kocis, Paul T
Skowronski, Jenna N
Leslie, Douglas L
Fox, Edward J
author_sort Reynolds, Alan W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several different classes of medications have been shown to be efficacious at preventing fractures in patients with osteoporosis. No study has compared real world efficacy at preventing fractures between all currently approved medications. OBJECTIVES: To directly compare the efficacy of all currently available osteoporosis medications by using a large population claims database. METHODS: The Truven Health Analytics MarketScan(®) database from 2008 - 2012 was used to identify all patients who started a new osteoporosis medication. Patients who experienced a fracture after at least 12 months of treatment were identified and risk factors for fracture for all patients were recorded. Logistic regression was used to account for and quantify the contribution of risk factors, and to make direct comparisons between different osteoporosis medications. RESULTS: A total of 51649 patients were included in the cohort, with an average age of 56 years. The overall incidence rate of fracture was 1.55 per 100 person - years of treatment. Orally administered medications had the lowest fracture rates, led by raloxifene and alendronate (1.24 and 1.54 respectively), while parenterally administered medications including teriparatide and zolerdonic acid had the highest rates (3.90 and 1.98 respectively). No statistically significant differences found between oral or parenterally administered bisphosphonate medications. CONCLUSIONS: While patients taking orally administered drugs including bisphosphonates had less frequent incident fracture no statistically significant differences were found between most drugs in head - to - head comparisons, even considering the route of administration of bisphosphonates. These findings support previous evidence that minimal differences in efficacy exist between different osteoporosis medications. This is the first study using a large database to compare all currently available osteoporosis treatments and will hopefully be augmented by further study to provide more evidence to make clinical decisions on osteoporosis medication use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6216103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62161032018-11-21 Comparison of Osteoporosis Pharmacotherapy Fracture Rates: Analysis of a MarketScan(®) Claims Database Cohort Reynolds, Alan W Liu, Guodong Kocis, Paul T Skowronski, Jenna N Leslie, Douglas L Fox, Edward J Int J Endocrinol Metab Research Article BACKGROUND: Several different classes of medications have been shown to be efficacious at preventing fractures in patients with osteoporosis. No study has compared real world efficacy at preventing fractures between all currently approved medications. OBJECTIVES: To directly compare the efficacy of all currently available osteoporosis medications by using a large population claims database. METHODS: The Truven Health Analytics MarketScan(®) database from 2008 - 2012 was used to identify all patients who started a new osteoporosis medication. Patients who experienced a fracture after at least 12 months of treatment were identified and risk factors for fracture for all patients were recorded. Logistic regression was used to account for and quantify the contribution of risk factors, and to make direct comparisons between different osteoporosis medications. RESULTS: A total of 51649 patients were included in the cohort, with an average age of 56 years. The overall incidence rate of fracture was 1.55 per 100 person - years of treatment. Orally administered medications had the lowest fracture rates, led by raloxifene and alendronate (1.24 and 1.54 respectively), while parenterally administered medications including teriparatide and zolerdonic acid had the highest rates (3.90 and 1.98 respectively). No statistically significant differences found between oral or parenterally administered bisphosphonate medications. CONCLUSIONS: While patients taking orally administered drugs including bisphosphonates had less frequent incident fracture no statistically significant differences were found between most drugs in head - to - head comparisons, even considering the route of administration of bisphosphonates. These findings support previous evidence that minimal differences in efficacy exist between different osteoporosis medications. This is the first study using a large database to compare all currently available osteoporosis treatments and will hopefully be augmented by further study to provide more evidence to make clinical decisions on osteoporosis medication use. Kowsar 2018-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6216103/ /pubmed/30464768 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ijem.12104 Text en Copyright © 2018, International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Research Article
Reynolds, Alan W
Liu, Guodong
Kocis, Paul T
Skowronski, Jenna N
Leslie, Douglas L
Fox, Edward J
Comparison of Osteoporosis Pharmacotherapy Fracture Rates: Analysis of a MarketScan(®) Claims Database Cohort
title Comparison of Osteoporosis Pharmacotherapy Fracture Rates: Analysis of a MarketScan(®) Claims Database Cohort
title_full Comparison of Osteoporosis Pharmacotherapy Fracture Rates: Analysis of a MarketScan(®) Claims Database Cohort
title_fullStr Comparison of Osteoporosis Pharmacotherapy Fracture Rates: Analysis of a MarketScan(®) Claims Database Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Osteoporosis Pharmacotherapy Fracture Rates: Analysis of a MarketScan(®) Claims Database Cohort
title_short Comparison of Osteoporosis Pharmacotherapy Fracture Rates: Analysis of a MarketScan(®) Claims Database Cohort
title_sort comparison of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy fracture rates: analysis of a marketscan(®) claims database cohort
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6216103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464768
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ijem.12104
work_keys_str_mv AT reynoldsalanw comparisonofosteoporosispharmacotherapyfractureratesanalysisofamarketscanclaimsdatabasecohort
AT liuguodong comparisonofosteoporosispharmacotherapyfractureratesanalysisofamarketscanclaimsdatabasecohort
AT kocispault comparisonofosteoporosispharmacotherapyfractureratesanalysisofamarketscanclaimsdatabasecohort
AT skowronskijennan comparisonofosteoporosispharmacotherapyfractureratesanalysisofamarketscanclaimsdatabasecohort
AT lesliedouglasl comparisonofosteoporosispharmacotherapyfractureratesanalysisofamarketscanclaimsdatabasecohort
AT foxedwardj comparisonofosteoporosispharmacotherapyfractureratesanalysisofamarketscanclaimsdatabasecohort