Cargando…

Intracranial pressure responsiveness to positive end-expiratory pressure in different respiratory mechanics: a preliminary experimental study in pigs

BACKGROUND: Respiratory mechanics affects the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intracranial pressure (ICP). Respiratory mechanics of the lung and the chest wall was not differentiated in previous studies. In the present study, we investigated the influence of the following possib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Han, Zhou, Jing, Lin, Yi-Qin, Zhou, Jian-Xin, Yu, Rong-Guo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6217765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30396336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1191-4
_version_ 1783368355292381184
author Chen, Han
Zhou, Jing
Lin, Yi-Qin
Zhou, Jian-Xin
Yu, Rong-Guo
author_facet Chen, Han
Zhou, Jing
Lin, Yi-Qin
Zhou, Jian-Xin
Yu, Rong-Guo
author_sort Chen, Han
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Respiratory mechanics affects the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intracranial pressure (ICP). Respiratory mechanics of the lung and the chest wall was not differentiated in previous studies. In the present study, we investigated the influence of the following possible determinants of ICP responsiveness to PEEP: chest wall elastance (E(CW)), lung elastance (E(L)), and baseline ICP. METHODS: Eight healthy Bama miniature pigs were studied. The increase of E(L) was induced by instillation of hydrochloride, and the increase of E(CW) was induced by strapping the animals’ chest wall and abdomen. A balloon-tipped catheter was placed intracranially for inducing intracranial hypertension. Six experimental conditions were investigated in sequence: 1) Normal; 2) Stiff Chest Wall; 3) Lung Injury; 4) Lung Injury + Stiff Chest Wall; 5) Lung Injury + Stiff Chest Wall + Intracranial Hypertension and 6) Lung Injury + Intracranial Hypertension. PEEP was gradually increased in a 5 cm H(2)O interval from 5 to 25 cm H(2)O in each condition. Blood pressure, central venous pressure, ICP, airway pressure and esophageal pressure were measured. RESULTS: Hydrochloride instillation significantly increased E(L) in conditions with lung injury. E(CW) significantly increased in the conditions with chest wall and abdomen strapping (all p <  0.05). ICP significantly increased with increments of PEEP in all non-intracranial hypertension conditions (p <  0.001). The greatest cumulative increase in ICP was observed in the Stiff Chest Wall condition (6 [5.3, 6.8] mm Hg), while the lowest cumulative increase in ICP was observed in the Lung Injury condition (2 [1.3, 3.8] mm Hg). ICP significantly decreased when PEEP was increased in the intracranial hypertension conditions (p <  0.001). There was no significant difference in cumulative ICP change between the two intracranial hypertension conditions (p = 0.924). CONCLUSIONS: Different respiratory mechanics models can be established via hydrochloride induced lung injury and chest wall and abdominal strapping. The effect of PEEP on ICP is determined by respiratory mechanics in pigs with normal ICP. However, the responsiveness of ICP to PEEP is independent of respiratory mechanics when there is intracranial hypertension.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6217765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62177652018-11-08 Intracranial pressure responsiveness to positive end-expiratory pressure in different respiratory mechanics: a preliminary experimental study in pigs Chen, Han Zhou, Jing Lin, Yi-Qin Zhou, Jian-Xin Yu, Rong-Guo BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Respiratory mechanics affects the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intracranial pressure (ICP). Respiratory mechanics of the lung and the chest wall was not differentiated in previous studies. In the present study, we investigated the influence of the following possible determinants of ICP responsiveness to PEEP: chest wall elastance (E(CW)), lung elastance (E(L)), and baseline ICP. METHODS: Eight healthy Bama miniature pigs were studied. The increase of E(L) was induced by instillation of hydrochloride, and the increase of E(CW) was induced by strapping the animals’ chest wall and abdomen. A balloon-tipped catheter was placed intracranially for inducing intracranial hypertension. Six experimental conditions were investigated in sequence: 1) Normal; 2) Stiff Chest Wall; 3) Lung Injury; 4) Lung Injury + Stiff Chest Wall; 5) Lung Injury + Stiff Chest Wall + Intracranial Hypertension and 6) Lung Injury + Intracranial Hypertension. PEEP was gradually increased in a 5 cm H(2)O interval from 5 to 25 cm H(2)O in each condition. Blood pressure, central venous pressure, ICP, airway pressure and esophageal pressure were measured. RESULTS: Hydrochloride instillation significantly increased E(L) in conditions with lung injury. E(CW) significantly increased in the conditions with chest wall and abdomen strapping (all p <  0.05). ICP significantly increased with increments of PEEP in all non-intracranial hypertension conditions (p <  0.001). The greatest cumulative increase in ICP was observed in the Stiff Chest Wall condition (6 [5.3, 6.8] mm Hg), while the lowest cumulative increase in ICP was observed in the Lung Injury condition (2 [1.3, 3.8] mm Hg). ICP significantly decreased when PEEP was increased in the intracranial hypertension conditions (p <  0.001). There was no significant difference in cumulative ICP change between the two intracranial hypertension conditions (p = 0.924). CONCLUSIONS: Different respiratory mechanics models can be established via hydrochloride induced lung injury and chest wall and abdominal strapping. The effect of PEEP on ICP is determined by respiratory mechanics in pigs with normal ICP. However, the responsiveness of ICP to PEEP is independent of respiratory mechanics when there is intracranial hypertension. BioMed Central 2018-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6217765/ /pubmed/30396336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1191-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Han
Zhou, Jing
Lin, Yi-Qin
Zhou, Jian-Xin
Yu, Rong-Guo
Intracranial pressure responsiveness to positive end-expiratory pressure in different respiratory mechanics: a preliminary experimental study in pigs
title Intracranial pressure responsiveness to positive end-expiratory pressure in different respiratory mechanics: a preliminary experimental study in pigs
title_full Intracranial pressure responsiveness to positive end-expiratory pressure in different respiratory mechanics: a preliminary experimental study in pigs
title_fullStr Intracranial pressure responsiveness to positive end-expiratory pressure in different respiratory mechanics: a preliminary experimental study in pigs
title_full_unstemmed Intracranial pressure responsiveness to positive end-expiratory pressure in different respiratory mechanics: a preliminary experimental study in pigs
title_short Intracranial pressure responsiveness to positive end-expiratory pressure in different respiratory mechanics: a preliminary experimental study in pigs
title_sort intracranial pressure responsiveness to positive end-expiratory pressure in different respiratory mechanics: a preliminary experimental study in pigs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6217765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30396336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1191-4
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhan intracranialpressureresponsivenesstopositiveendexpiratorypressureindifferentrespiratorymechanicsapreliminaryexperimentalstudyinpigs
AT zhoujing intracranialpressureresponsivenesstopositiveendexpiratorypressureindifferentrespiratorymechanicsapreliminaryexperimentalstudyinpigs
AT linyiqin intracranialpressureresponsivenesstopositiveendexpiratorypressureindifferentrespiratorymechanicsapreliminaryexperimentalstudyinpigs
AT zhoujianxin intracranialpressureresponsivenesstopositiveendexpiratorypressureindifferentrespiratorymechanicsapreliminaryexperimentalstudyinpigs
AT yurongguo intracranialpressureresponsivenesstopositiveendexpiratorypressureindifferentrespiratorymechanicsapreliminaryexperimentalstudyinpigs