Cargando…

Catheter-induced Errors in Pressure Measurements in Vessels: an In-vitro and Numerical Study

Accurate measurement of blood pressure is important because it is a biomarker for cardiovascular disease. Diagnostic catheterization is routinely used for pressure acquisition in vessels despite being subject to significant measurement errors. To investigate these errors, this study compares pressur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Vecchi, Adelaide, Clough, Rachel E., Gaddum, Nicholas R., Rutten, Marcel C.M., Lamata, Pablo, Schaeffter, Tobias, Nordsletten, David A., Smith, Nicolas P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6217912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24845294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2014.2308594
_version_ 1783368374783311872
author de Vecchi, Adelaide
Clough, Rachel E.
Gaddum, Nicholas R.
Rutten, Marcel C.M.
Lamata, Pablo
Schaeffter, Tobias
Nordsletten, David A.
Smith, Nicolas P.
author_facet de Vecchi, Adelaide
Clough, Rachel E.
Gaddum, Nicholas R.
Rutten, Marcel C.M.
Lamata, Pablo
Schaeffter, Tobias
Nordsletten, David A.
Smith, Nicolas P.
author_sort de Vecchi, Adelaide
collection PubMed
description Accurate measurement of blood pressure is important because it is a biomarker for cardiovascular disease. Diagnostic catheterization is routinely used for pressure acquisition in vessels despite being subject to significant measurement errors. To investigate these errors, this study compares pressure measurement using two different techniques in vitro and numerical simulations. Pressure was acquired in a pulsatile flow phantom using a 6F fluid-filled catheter and a 0.014” pressure wire, which is considered the current gold standard. Numerical simulations of the experimental set-up with and without a catheter were also performed. Despite the low catheter-to-vessel radius ratio, the catheter traces showed a 24% peak systolic pressure overestimation compared to the wire. The numerical models replicated this difference and indicated the cause for overestimation was the increased flow resistance due to the presence of the catheter. Further, the higher frequency pressure oscillations observed in the wire and numerical data were absent in the catheter, resulting in an overestimation of the pulse wave velocity with the latter modality. These results show that catheter geometry produces significant measurement bias in both the peak pressure and the waveform shape even with radius ratios considered acceptable in clinical practice. The wire allows for more accurate pressure quantification, in agreement with the numerical model without a catheter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6217912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62179122018-11-05 Catheter-induced Errors in Pressure Measurements in Vessels: an In-vitro and Numerical Study de Vecchi, Adelaide Clough, Rachel E. Gaddum, Nicholas R. Rutten, Marcel C.M. Lamata, Pablo Schaeffter, Tobias Nordsletten, David A. Smith, Nicolas P. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Article Accurate measurement of blood pressure is important because it is a biomarker for cardiovascular disease. Diagnostic catheterization is routinely used for pressure acquisition in vessels despite being subject to significant measurement errors. To investigate these errors, this study compares pressure measurement using two different techniques in vitro and numerical simulations. Pressure was acquired in a pulsatile flow phantom using a 6F fluid-filled catheter and a 0.014” pressure wire, which is considered the current gold standard. Numerical simulations of the experimental set-up with and without a catheter were also performed. Despite the low catheter-to-vessel radius ratio, the catheter traces showed a 24% peak systolic pressure overestimation compared to the wire. The numerical models replicated this difference and indicated the cause for overestimation was the increased flow resistance due to the presence of the catheter. Further, the higher frequency pressure oscillations observed in the wire and numerical data were absent in the catheter, resulting in an overestimation of the pulse wave velocity with the latter modality. These results show that catheter geometry produces significant measurement bias in both the peak pressure and the waveform shape even with radius ratios considered acceptable in clinical practice. The wire allows for more accurate pressure quantification, in agreement with the numerical model without a catheter. 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6217912/ /pubmed/24845294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2014.2308594 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. For more information, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.
spellingShingle Article
de Vecchi, Adelaide
Clough, Rachel E.
Gaddum, Nicholas R.
Rutten, Marcel C.M.
Lamata, Pablo
Schaeffter, Tobias
Nordsletten, David A.
Smith, Nicolas P.
Catheter-induced Errors in Pressure Measurements in Vessels: an In-vitro and Numerical Study
title Catheter-induced Errors in Pressure Measurements in Vessels: an In-vitro and Numerical Study
title_full Catheter-induced Errors in Pressure Measurements in Vessels: an In-vitro and Numerical Study
title_fullStr Catheter-induced Errors in Pressure Measurements in Vessels: an In-vitro and Numerical Study
title_full_unstemmed Catheter-induced Errors in Pressure Measurements in Vessels: an In-vitro and Numerical Study
title_short Catheter-induced Errors in Pressure Measurements in Vessels: an In-vitro and Numerical Study
title_sort catheter-induced errors in pressure measurements in vessels: an in-vitro and numerical study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6217912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24845294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2014.2308594
work_keys_str_mv AT devecchiadelaide catheterinducederrorsinpressuremeasurementsinvesselsaninvitroandnumericalstudy
AT cloughrachele catheterinducederrorsinpressuremeasurementsinvesselsaninvitroandnumericalstudy
AT gaddumnicholasr catheterinducederrorsinpressuremeasurementsinvesselsaninvitroandnumericalstudy
AT ruttenmarcelcm catheterinducederrorsinpressuremeasurementsinvesselsaninvitroandnumericalstudy
AT lamatapablo catheterinducederrorsinpressuremeasurementsinvesselsaninvitroandnumericalstudy
AT schaefftertobias catheterinducederrorsinpressuremeasurementsinvesselsaninvitroandnumericalstudy
AT nordslettendavida catheterinducederrorsinpressuremeasurementsinvesselsaninvitroandnumericalstudy
AT smithnicolasp catheterinducederrorsinpressuremeasurementsinvesselsaninvitroandnumericalstudy