Cargando…

Validity of DXA body volume equations in a four-compartment model for adults with varying body mass index and waist circumference classifications

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the validity of 4-compartment (4C) model body fat percent (BF%) estimates when using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) derived body volume (BV) equations (4C-DXA1 and 4C-DXA2) in adults with varying body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLester, Cherilyn N., Nickerson, Brett S., Kliszczewicz, Brian M., Hicks, Courtenay S., Williamson, Cassie M., Bechke, Emily E., McLester, John R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6218073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30395588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206866
_version_ 1783368395111006208
author McLester, Cherilyn N.
Nickerson, Brett S.
Kliszczewicz, Brian M.
Hicks, Courtenay S.
Williamson, Cassie M.
Bechke, Emily E.
McLester, John R.
author_facet McLester, Cherilyn N.
Nickerson, Brett S.
Kliszczewicz, Brian M.
Hicks, Courtenay S.
Williamson, Cassie M.
Bechke, Emily E.
McLester, John R.
author_sort McLester, Cherilyn N.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this investigation was to determine the validity of 4-compartment (4C) model body fat percent (BF%) estimates when using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) derived body volume (BV) equations (4C-DXA1 and 4C-DXA2) in adults with varying body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) classifications. Each model was compared to a criterion 4C model with air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) generated BV (4C-ADP). Participants were categorized as normal weight (n = 40; NW = BMI<25.0kg/m(2)); overweight (n = 40; OW(BMI) = BMI≥25.0 kg/m(2)); and overweight with at-risk WC (n = 35; OW(BMI+WC) = BMI≥25.0 kg/m(2) and WC≥88.0cm for women and 102.0cm for men). 4C-DXA1 produced lower BF% than that derived using the 4C-ADP in NW (CE = -3.0%; p<0.001) while 4C-DXA2 was significantly higher (CE = 4.8%; p<0.001). The SEE and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were lower for 4C-DXA2 (1.24% and ±2.5%, respectively) than 4C-DXA1 (2.59% and ±5.0%, respectively) and proportional bias was present for both (p<0.05). 4C-DXA1 BF% was not significant in OW(BMI) (CE = -0.5%; p = 0.112) whereas 4C-DXA2 was higher (CE = 4.5%; p<0.001). The SEE and 95% LOA were lower for 4C-DXA2 (1.20% and ±2.9%, respectively) than 4C-DXA1 (1.92% and ±3.9%, respectively) in OW(BMI). Proportional bias was present for 4C-DXA1 (p = 0.007), but not 4C-DXA2 (p = 0.832). 4C-DXA1 and 4C-DXA2 produced significantly higher BF% in OW(BMI+WC) (CE = 2.2 and 2.3%, respectively; both p<0.001). The SEE and 95% LOA remained lower for 4C-DXA2 (1.15% and ±2.5%, respectively) than 4C-DXA1 (1.84% and ±3.8%, respectively). There was proportional bias for 4C-DXA2 (p = 0.020), but not 4C-DXA1 (p = 0.183) in OW(BMI+WC). Only one prediction model (i.e., 4C-DXA1 in OW(BMI+WC)) revealed valid estimates of BF%. Practitioners are encouraged to use criteria for both BMI and WC when utilizing DXA-derived BV in 4C-models for normal and overweight populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6218073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62180732018-11-19 Validity of DXA body volume equations in a four-compartment model for adults with varying body mass index and waist circumference classifications McLester, Cherilyn N. Nickerson, Brett S. Kliszczewicz, Brian M. Hicks, Courtenay S. Williamson, Cassie M. Bechke, Emily E. McLester, John R. PLoS One Research Article The purpose of this investigation was to determine the validity of 4-compartment (4C) model body fat percent (BF%) estimates when using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) derived body volume (BV) equations (4C-DXA1 and 4C-DXA2) in adults with varying body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) classifications. Each model was compared to a criterion 4C model with air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) generated BV (4C-ADP). Participants were categorized as normal weight (n = 40; NW = BMI<25.0kg/m(2)); overweight (n = 40; OW(BMI) = BMI≥25.0 kg/m(2)); and overweight with at-risk WC (n = 35; OW(BMI+WC) = BMI≥25.0 kg/m(2) and WC≥88.0cm for women and 102.0cm for men). 4C-DXA1 produced lower BF% than that derived using the 4C-ADP in NW (CE = -3.0%; p<0.001) while 4C-DXA2 was significantly higher (CE = 4.8%; p<0.001). The SEE and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were lower for 4C-DXA2 (1.24% and ±2.5%, respectively) than 4C-DXA1 (2.59% and ±5.0%, respectively) and proportional bias was present for both (p<0.05). 4C-DXA1 BF% was not significant in OW(BMI) (CE = -0.5%; p = 0.112) whereas 4C-DXA2 was higher (CE = 4.5%; p<0.001). The SEE and 95% LOA were lower for 4C-DXA2 (1.20% and ±2.9%, respectively) than 4C-DXA1 (1.92% and ±3.9%, respectively) in OW(BMI). Proportional bias was present for 4C-DXA1 (p = 0.007), but not 4C-DXA2 (p = 0.832). 4C-DXA1 and 4C-DXA2 produced significantly higher BF% in OW(BMI+WC) (CE = 2.2 and 2.3%, respectively; both p<0.001). The SEE and 95% LOA remained lower for 4C-DXA2 (1.15% and ±2.5%, respectively) than 4C-DXA1 (1.84% and ±3.8%, respectively). There was proportional bias for 4C-DXA2 (p = 0.020), but not 4C-DXA1 (p = 0.183) in OW(BMI+WC). Only one prediction model (i.e., 4C-DXA1 in OW(BMI+WC)) revealed valid estimates of BF%. Practitioners are encouraged to use criteria for both BMI and WC when utilizing DXA-derived BV in 4C-models for normal and overweight populations. Public Library of Science 2018-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6218073/ /pubmed/30395588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206866 Text en © 2018 McLester et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McLester, Cherilyn N.
Nickerson, Brett S.
Kliszczewicz, Brian M.
Hicks, Courtenay S.
Williamson, Cassie M.
Bechke, Emily E.
McLester, John R.
Validity of DXA body volume equations in a four-compartment model for adults with varying body mass index and waist circumference classifications
title Validity of DXA body volume equations in a four-compartment model for adults with varying body mass index and waist circumference classifications
title_full Validity of DXA body volume equations in a four-compartment model for adults with varying body mass index and waist circumference classifications
title_fullStr Validity of DXA body volume equations in a four-compartment model for adults with varying body mass index and waist circumference classifications
title_full_unstemmed Validity of DXA body volume equations in a four-compartment model for adults with varying body mass index and waist circumference classifications
title_short Validity of DXA body volume equations in a four-compartment model for adults with varying body mass index and waist circumference classifications
title_sort validity of dxa body volume equations in a four-compartment model for adults with varying body mass index and waist circumference classifications
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6218073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30395588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206866
work_keys_str_mv AT mclestercherilynn validityofdxabodyvolumeequationsinafourcompartmentmodelforadultswithvaryingbodymassindexandwaistcircumferenceclassifications
AT nickersonbretts validityofdxabodyvolumeequationsinafourcompartmentmodelforadultswithvaryingbodymassindexandwaistcircumferenceclassifications
AT kliszczewiczbrianm validityofdxabodyvolumeequationsinafourcompartmentmodelforadultswithvaryingbodymassindexandwaistcircumferenceclassifications
AT hickscourtenays validityofdxabodyvolumeequationsinafourcompartmentmodelforadultswithvaryingbodymassindexandwaistcircumferenceclassifications
AT williamsoncassiem validityofdxabodyvolumeequationsinafourcompartmentmodelforadultswithvaryingbodymassindexandwaistcircumferenceclassifications
AT bechkeemilye validityofdxabodyvolumeequationsinafourcompartmentmodelforadultswithvaryingbodymassindexandwaistcircumferenceclassifications
AT mclesterjohnr validityofdxabodyvolumeequationsinafourcompartmentmodelforadultswithvaryingbodymassindexandwaistcircumferenceclassifications