Cargando…

No Modulatory Effects when Stimulating the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus with Continuous 6 Hz tACS and tRNS on Response Inhibition: A Behavioral Study

Response inhibition is the cognitive process required to cancel an intended action. During that process, a “go” reaction is intercepted particularly by the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) and presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA). After the commission of inhibition errors, theta activity (4–8 Hz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brauer, Hannah, Kadish, Navah Ester, Pedersen, Anya, Siniatchkin, Michael, Moliadze, Vera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6218719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30425735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3156796
_version_ 1783368513531936768
author Brauer, Hannah
Kadish, Navah Ester
Pedersen, Anya
Siniatchkin, Michael
Moliadze, Vera
author_facet Brauer, Hannah
Kadish, Navah Ester
Pedersen, Anya
Siniatchkin, Michael
Moliadze, Vera
author_sort Brauer, Hannah
collection PubMed
description Response inhibition is the cognitive process required to cancel an intended action. During that process, a “go” reaction is intercepted particularly by the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) and presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA). After the commission of inhibition errors, theta activity (4–8 Hz) is related to the adaption processes. In this study, we intend to examine whether the boosting of theta activity by electrical stimulation over rIFG reduces the number of errors and the reaction times in a response inhibition task (Go/NoGo paradigm) during and after stimulation. 23 healthy right-handed adults participated in the study. In three separate sessions, theta tACS at 6 Hz, transcranial random noise (tRNS) as a second stimulation condition, and sham stimulation were applied for 20 minutes. Based on behavioral data, this study could not show any effects of 6 Hz tACS as well as full spectrum tRNS on response inhibition in any of the conditions. Since many findings support the relevance of the rIFG for response inhibition, this could mean that 6 Hz activity is not important for response inhibition in that structure. Reasons for our null findings could also lie in the stimulation parameters, such as the electrode montage or the stimulation frequency, which are discussed in this article in more detail. Sharing negative findings will have (1) positive impact on future research questions and study design and will improve (2) knowledge acquisition of noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6218719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62187192018-11-13 No Modulatory Effects when Stimulating the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus with Continuous 6 Hz tACS and tRNS on Response Inhibition: A Behavioral Study Brauer, Hannah Kadish, Navah Ester Pedersen, Anya Siniatchkin, Michael Moliadze, Vera Neural Plast Research Article Response inhibition is the cognitive process required to cancel an intended action. During that process, a “go” reaction is intercepted particularly by the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) and presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA). After the commission of inhibition errors, theta activity (4–8 Hz) is related to the adaption processes. In this study, we intend to examine whether the boosting of theta activity by electrical stimulation over rIFG reduces the number of errors and the reaction times in a response inhibition task (Go/NoGo paradigm) during and after stimulation. 23 healthy right-handed adults participated in the study. In three separate sessions, theta tACS at 6 Hz, transcranial random noise (tRNS) as a second stimulation condition, and sham stimulation were applied for 20 minutes. Based on behavioral data, this study could not show any effects of 6 Hz tACS as well as full spectrum tRNS on response inhibition in any of the conditions. Since many findings support the relevance of the rIFG for response inhibition, this could mean that 6 Hz activity is not important for response inhibition in that structure. Reasons for our null findings could also lie in the stimulation parameters, such as the electrode montage or the stimulation frequency, which are discussed in this article in more detail. Sharing negative findings will have (1) positive impact on future research questions and study design and will improve (2) knowledge acquisition of noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation techniques. Hindawi 2018-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6218719/ /pubmed/30425735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3156796 Text en Copyright © 2018 Hannah Brauer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brauer, Hannah
Kadish, Navah Ester
Pedersen, Anya
Siniatchkin, Michael
Moliadze, Vera
No Modulatory Effects when Stimulating the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus with Continuous 6 Hz tACS and tRNS on Response Inhibition: A Behavioral Study
title No Modulatory Effects when Stimulating the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus with Continuous 6 Hz tACS and tRNS on Response Inhibition: A Behavioral Study
title_full No Modulatory Effects when Stimulating the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus with Continuous 6 Hz tACS and tRNS on Response Inhibition: A Behavioral Study
title_fullStr No Modulatory Effects when Stimulating the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus with Continuous 6 Hz tACS and tRNS on Response Inhibition: A Behavioral Study
title_full_unstemmed No Modulatory Effects when Stimulating the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus with Continuous 6 Hz tACS and tRNS on Response Inhibition: A Behavioral Study
title_short No Modulatory Effects when Stimulating the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus with Continuous 6 Hz tACS and tRNS on Response Inhibition: A Behavioral Study
title_sort no modulatory effects when stimulating the right inferior frontal gyrus with continuous 6 hz tacs and trns on response inhibition: a behavioral study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6218719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30425735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3156796
work_keys_str_mv AT brauerhannah nomodulatoryeffectswhenstimulatingtherightinferiorfrontalgyruswithcontinuous6hztacsandtrnsonresponseinhibitionabehavioralstudy
AT kadishnavahester nomodulatoryeffectswhenstimulatingtherightinferiorfrontalgyruswithcontinuous6hztacsandtrnsonresponseinhibitionabehavioralstudy
AT pedersenanya nomodulatoryeffectswhenstimulatingtherightinferiorfrontalgyruswithcontinuous6hztacsandtrnsonresponseinhibitionabehavioralstudy
AT siniatchkinmichael nomodulatoryeffectswhenstimulatingtherightinferiorfrontalgyruswithcontinuous6hztacsandtrnsonresponseinhibitionabehavioralstudy
AT moliadzevera nomodulatoryeffectswhenstimulatingtherightinferiorfrontalgyruswithcontinuous6hztacsandtrnsonresponseinhibitionabehavioralstudy