Cargando…

Two Populations of Mites (Tyrophagus putrescentiae) Differ in Response to Feeding on Feces-Containing Diets

Background: Tyrophagus putrescentiae is a ubiquitous mite species in soil, stored products and house dust and infests food and causes allergies in people. T. putrescentiae populations harbor different bacterial communities, including intracellular symbionts and gut bacteria. The spread of microorgan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hubert, Jan, Nesvorna, Marta, Sopko, Bruno, Smrz, Jaroslav, Klimov, Pavel, Erban, Tomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6218854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30425700
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02590
_version_ 1783368537391235072
author Hubert, Jan
Nesvorna, Marta
Sopko, Bruno
Smrz, Jaroslav
Klimov, Pavel
Erban, Tomas
author_facet Hubert, Jan
Nesvorna, Marta
Sopko, Bruno
Smrz, Jaroslav
Klimov, Pavel
Erban, Tomas
author_sort Hubert, Jan
collection PubMed
description Background: Tyrophagus putrescentiae is a ubiquitous mite species in soil, stored products and house dust and infests food and causes allergies in people. T. putrescentiae populations harbor different bacterial communities, including intracellular symbionts and gut bacteria. The spread of microorganisms via the fecal pellets of T. putrescentiae is a possibility that has not been studied in detail but may be an important means by which gut bacteria colonize subsequent generations of mites. Feces in soil may be a vector for the spread of microorganisms. Methods: Extracts from used mite culture medium (i.e., residual food, mite feces, and dead mite bodies) were used as a source of feces-inhabiting microorganisms as food for the mites. Two T. putrescentiae populations (L and P) were used for experiments, and they hosted the intracellular bacteria Cardinium and Wolbachia, respectively. The effects of the fecal fraction on respiration in a mite microcosm, mite nutrient contents, population growth and microbiome composition were evaluated. Results: Feces from the P population comprised more than 90% Bartonella-like sequences. Feces from the L population feces hosted Staphylococcus, Virgibacillus, Brevibacterium, Enterobacteriaceae, and Bacillus. The mites from the P population, but not the L population, exhibited increased bacterial respiration in the microcosms in comparison to no-mite controls. Both L- and P-feces extracts had an inhibitory effect on the respiration of the microcosms, indicating antagonistic interactions within feces-associated bacteria. The mite microbiomes were resistant to the acquisition of new bacterial species from the feces, but their bacterial profiles were affected. Feeding of P mites on P-feces-enriched diets resulted in an increase in Bartonella abundance from 6 to 20% of the total bacterial sequences and a decrease in Bacillus abundance. The population growth was fivefold accelerated on P-feces extracts in comparison to the control. Conclusion: The mite microbiome, to a certain extent, resists the acquisition of new bacteria when mites are fed on feces of the same species. However, a Bartonella-like bacteria-feces-enriched diet seems to be beneficial for mite populations with symbiotic Bartonella-like bacteria. Coprophagy on the feces of its own population may be a mechanism of bacterial acquisition in T. putrescentiae.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6218854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62188542018-11-13 Two Populations of Mites (Tyrophagus putrescentiae) Differ in Response to Feeding on Feces-Containing Diets Hubert, Jan Nesvorna, Marta Sopko, Bruno Smrz, Jaroslav Klimov, Pavel Erban, Tomas Front Microbiol Microbiology Background: Tyrophagus putrescentiae is a ubiquitous mite species in soil, stored products and house dust and infests food and causes allergies in people. T. putrescentiae populations harbor different bacterial communities, including intracellular symbionts and gut bacteria. The spread of microorganisms via the fecal pellets of T. putrescentiae is a possibility that has not been studied in detail but may be an important means by which gut bacteria colonize subsequent generations of mites. Feces in soil may be a vector for the spread of microorganisms. Methods: Extracts from used mite culture medium (i.e., residual food, mite feces, and dead mite bodies) were used as a source of feces-inhabiting microorganisms as food for the mites. Two T. putrescentiae populations (L and P) were used for experiments, and they hosted the intracellular bacteria Cardinium and Wolbachia, respectively. The effects of the fecal fraction on respiration in a mite microcosm, mite nutrient contents, population growth and microbiome composition were evaluated. Results: Feces from the P population comprised more than 90% Bartonella-like sequences. Feces from the L population feces hosted Staphylococcus, Virgibacillus, Brevibacterium, Enterobacteriaceae, and Bacillus. The mites from the P population, but not the L population, exhibited increased bacterial respiration in the microcosms in comparison to no-mite controls. Both L- and P-feces extracts had an inhibitory effect on the respiration of the microcosms, indicating antagonistic interactions within feces-associated bacteria. The mite microbiomes were resistant to the acquisition of new bacterial species from the feces, but their bacterial profiles were affected. Feeding of P mites on P-feces-enriched diets resulted in an increase in Bartonella abundance from 6 to 20% of the total bacterial sequences and a decrease in Bacillus abundance. The population growth was fivefold accelerated on P-feces extracts in comparison to the control. Conclusion: The mite microbiome, to a certain extent, resists the acquisition of new bacteria when mites are fed on feces of the same species. However, a Bartonella-like bacteria-feces-enriched diet seems to be beneficial for mite populations with symbiotic Bartonella-like bacteria. Coprophagy on the feces of its own population may be a mechanism of bacterial acquisition in T. putrescentiae. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6218854/ /pubmed/30425700 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02590 Text en Copyright © 2018 Hubert, Nesvorna, Sopko, Smrz, Klimov and Erban. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Hubert, Jan
Nesvorna, Marta
Sopko, Bruno
Smrz, Jaroslav
Klimov, Pavel
Erban, Tomas
Two Populations of Mites (Tyrophagus putrescentiae) Differ in Response to Feeding on Feces-Containing Diets
title Two Populations of Mites (Tyrophagus putrescentiae) Differ in Response to Feeding on Feces-Containing Diets
title_full Two Populations of Mites (Tyrophagus putrescentiae) Differ in Response to Feeding on Feces-Containing Diets
title_fullStr Two Populations of Mites (Tyrophagus putrescentiae) Differ in Response to Feeding on Feces-Containing Diets
title_full_unstemmed Two Populations of Mites (Tyrophagus putrescentiae) Differ in Response to Feeding on Feces-Containing Diets
title_short Two Populations of Mites (Tyrophagus putrescentiae) Differ in Response to Feeding on Feces-Containing Diets
title_sort two populations of mites (tyrophagus putrescentiae) differ in response to feeding on feces-containing diets
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6218854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30425700
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02590
work_keys_str_mv AT hubertjan twopopulationsofmitestyrophagusputrescentiaedifferinresponsetofeedingonfecescontainingdiets
AT nesvornamarta twopopulationsofmitestyrophagusputrescentiaedifferinresponsetofeedingonfecescontainingdiets
AT sopkobruno twopopulationsofmitestyrophagusputrescentiaedifferinresponsetofeedingonfecescontainingdiets
AT smrzjaroslav twopopulationsofmitestyrophagusputrescentiaedifferinresponsetofeedingonfecescontainingdiets
AT klimovpavel twopopulationsofmitestyrophagusputrescentiaedifferinresponsetofeedingonfecescontainingdiets
AT erbantomas twopopulationsofmitestyrophagusputrescentiaedifferinresponsetofeedingonfecescontainingdiets