Cargando…

DELTA(2) guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: A key step in the design of a RCT is the estimation of the number of participants needed in the study. The most common approach is to specify a target difference between the treatments for the primary outcome and then calculate the required sample size. The sample size is chosen to ensur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cook, Jonathan A., Julious, Steven A., Sones, William, Hampson, Lisa V., Hewitt, Catherine, Berlin, Jesse A., Ashby, Deborah, Emsley, Richard, Fergusson, Dean A., Walters, Stephen J., Wilson, Edward C. F., Maclennan, Graeme, Stallard, Nigel, Rothwell, Joanne C., Bland, Martin, Brown, Louise, Ramsay, Craig R., Cook, Andrew, Armstrong, David, Altman, Doug, Vale, Luke D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6218987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2884-0
_version_ 1783368558998192128
author Cook, Jonathan A.
Julious, Steven A.
Sones, William
Hampson, Lisa V.
Hewitt, Catherine
Berlin, Jesse A.
Ashby, Deborah
Emsley, Richard
Fergusson, Dean A.
Walters, Stephen J.
Wilson, Edward C. F.
Maclennan, Graeme
Stallard, Nigel
Rothwell, Joanne C.
Bland, Martin
Brown, Louise
Ramsay, Craig R.
Cook, Andrew
Armstrong, David
Altman, Doug
Vale, Luke D.
author_facet Cook, Jonathan A.
Julious, Steven A.
Sones, William
Hampson, Lisa V.
Hewitt, Catherine
Berlin, Jesse A.
Ashby, Deborah
Emsley, Richard
Fergusson, Dean A.
Walters, Stephen J.
Wilson, Edward C. F.
Maclennan, Graeme
Stallard, Nigel
Rothwell, Joanne C.
Bland, Martin
Brown, Louise
Ramsay, Craig R.
Cook, Andrew
Armstrong, David
Altman, Doug
Vale, Luke D.
author_sort Cook, Jonathan A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A key step in the design of a RCT is the estimation of the number of participants needed in the study. The most common approach is to specify a target difference between the treatments for the primary outcome and then calculate the required sample size. The sample size is chosen to ensure that the trial will have a high probability (adequate statistical power) of detecting a target difference between the treatments should one exist. The sample size has many implications for the conduct and interpretation of the study. Despite the critical role that the target difference has in the design of a RCT, the way in which it is determined has received little attention. In this article, we summarise the key considerations and messages from new guidance for researchers and funders on specifying the target difference, and undertaking and reporting a RCT sample size calculation. This article on choosing the target difference for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation has been dual published in the BMJ and BMC Trials journals METHODS: The DELTA(2) (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) project comprised five major components: systematic literature reviews of recent methodological developments (stage 1) and existing funder guidance (stage 2); a Delphi study (stage 3); a two-day consensus meeting bringing together researchers, funders and patient representatives (stage 4); and the preparation and dissemination of a guidance document (stage 5). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The key messages from the DELTA(2) guidance on determining the target difference and sample size calculation for a randomised caontrolled trial are presented. Recommendations for the subsequent reporting of the sample size calculation are also provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6218987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62189872018-11-08 DELTA(2) guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial Cook, Jonathan A. Julious, Steven A. Sones, William Hampson, Lisa V. Hewitt, Catherine Berlin, Jesse A. Ashby, Deborah Emsley, Richard Fergusson, Dean A. Walters, Stephen J. Wilson, Edward C. F. Maclennan, Graeme Stallard, Nigel Rothwell, Joanne C. Bland, Martin Brown, Louise Ramsay, Craig R. Cook, Andrew Armstrong, David Altman, Doug Vale, Luke D. Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: A key step in the design of a RCT is the estimation of the number of participants needed in the study. The most common approach is to specify a target difference between the treatments for the primary outcome and then calculate the required sample size. The sample size is chosen to ensure that the trial will have a high probability (adequate statistical power) of detecting a target difference between the treatments should one exist. The sample size has many implications for the conduct and interpretation of the study. Despite the critical role that the target difference has in the design of a RCT, the way in which it is determined has received little attention. In this article, we summarise the key considerations and messages from new guidance for researchers and funders on specifying the target difference, and undertaking and reporting a RCT sample size calculation. This article on choosing the target difference for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation has been dual published in the BMJ and BMC Trials journals METHODS: The DELTA(2) (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) project comprised five major components: systematic literature reviews of recent methodological developments (stage 1) and existing funder guidance (stage 2); a Delphi study (stage 3); a two-day consensus meeting bringing together researchers, funders and patient representatives (stage 4); and the preparation and dissemination of a guidance document (stage 5). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The key messages from the DELTA(2) guidance on determining the target difference and sample size calculation for a randomised caontrolled trial are presented. Recommendations for the subsequent reporting of the sample size calculation are also provided. BioMed Central 2018-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6218987/ /pubmed/30400926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2884-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Cook, Jonathan A.
Julious, Steven A.
Sones, William
Hampson, Lisa V.
Hewitt, Catherine
Berlin, Jesse A.
Ashby, Deborah
Emsley, Richard
Fergusson, Dean A.
Walters, Stephen J.
Wilson, Edward C. F.
Maclennan, Graeme
Stallard, Nigel
Rothwell, Joanne C.
Bland, Martin
Brown, Louise
Ramsay, Craig R.
Cook, Andrew
Armstrong, David
Altman, Doug
Vale, Luke D.
DELTA(2) guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial
title DELTA(2) guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial
title_full DELTA(2) guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr DELTA(2) guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed DELTA(2) guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial
title_short DELTA(2) guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort delta(2) guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6218987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2884-0
work_keys_str_mv AT cookjonathana delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT juliousstevena delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT soneswilliam delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hampsonlisav delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hewittcatherine delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT berlinjessea delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ashbydeborah delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT emsleyrichard delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fergussondeana delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT waltersstephenj delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wilsonedwardcf delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT maclennangraeme delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stallardnigel delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rothwelljoannec delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT blandmartin delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brownlouise delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ramsaycraigr delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cookandrew delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT armstrongdavid delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT altmandoug delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT valeluked delta2guidanceonchoosingthetargetdifferenceandundertakingandreportingthesamplesizecalculationforarandomisedcontrolledtrial