Cargando…
Development and reliability assessment of a new quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies using biomarker data (BIOCROSS)
BACKGROUND: Biomarker-based analyses are commonly reported in observational epidemiological studies; however currently there are no specific study quality assessment tools to assist evaluation of conducted research. Accounting for study design and biomarker measurement would be important for derivin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0583-x |
_version_ | 1783368585382461440 |
---|---|
author | Wirsching, Jan Graßmann, Sophie Eichelmann, Fabian Harms, Laura Malin Schenk, Matthew Barth, Eva Berndzen, Alide Olalekan, Moses Sarmini, Leen Zuberer, Hedwig Aleksandrova, Krasimira |
author_facet | Wirsching, Jan Graßmann, Sophie Eichelmann, Fabian Harms, Laura Malin Schenk, Matthew Barth, Eva Berndzen, Alide Olalekan, Moses Sarmini, Leen Zuberer, Hedwig Aleksandrova, Krasimira |
author_sort | Wirsching, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Biomarker-based analyses are commonly reported in observational epidemiological studies; however currently there are no specific study quality assessment tools to assist evaluation of conducted research. Accounting for study design and biomarker measurement would be important for deriving valid conclusions when conducting systematic data evaluation. METHODS: We developed a study quality assessment tool designed specifically to assess biomarker-based cross-sectional studies (BIOCROSS) and evaluated its inter-rater reliability. The tool includes 10-items covering 5 domains: ‘Study rational’, ‘Design/Methods’, ‘Data analysis’, ‘Data interpretation’ and ‘Biomarker measurement’, aiming to assess different quality features of biomarker cross-sectional studies. To evaluate the inter-rater reliability, 30 studies were distributed among 5 raters and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC-s) were derived from respective ratings. RESULTS: The estimated overall ICC between the 5 raters was 0.57 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.38–0.74) indicating a good inter-rater reliability. The ICC-s ranged from 0.11 (95% CI: 0.01–0.27) for the domain ‘Study rational’ to 0.56 (95% CI: 0.40–0.72) for the domain ‘Data interpretation’. CONCLUSION: BIOCROSS is a new study quality assessment tool suitable for evaluation of reporting quality from cross-sectional epidemiological studies employing biomarker data. The tool proved to be reliable for use by biomedical scientists with diverse backgrounds and could facilitate comprehensive review of biomarker studies in human research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0583-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6219097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62190972018-11-16 Development and reliability assessment of a new quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies using biomarker data (BIOCROSS) Wirsching, Jan Graßmann, Sophie Eichelmann, Fabian Harms, Laura Malin Schenk, Matthew Barth, Eva Berndzen, Alide Olalekan, Moses Sarmini, Leen Zuberer, Hedwig Aleksandrova, Krasimira BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Biomarker-based analyses are commonly reported in observational epidemiological studies; however currently there are no specific study quality assessment tools to assist evaluation of conducted research. Accounting for study design and biomarker measurement would be important for deriving valid conclusions when conducting systematic data evaluation. METHODS: We developed a study quality assessment tool designed specifically to assess biomarker-based cross-sectional studies (BIOCROSS) and evaluated its inter-rater reliability. The tool includes 10-items covering 5 domains: ‘Study rational’, ‘Design/Methods’, ‘Data analysis’, ‘Data interpretation’ and ‘Biomarker measurement’, aiming to assess different quality features of biomarker cross-sectional studies. To evaluate the inter-rater reliability, 30 studies were distributed among 5 raters and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC-s) were derived from respective ratings. RESULTS: The estimated overall ICC between the 5 raters was 0.57 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.38–0.74) indicating a good inter-rater reliability. The ICC-s ranged from 0.11 (95% CI: 0.01–0.27) for the domain ‘Study rational’ to 0.56 (95% CI: 0.40–0.72) for the domain ‘Data interpretation’. CONCLUSION: BIOCROSS is a new study quality assessment tool suitable for evaluation of reporting quality from cross-sectional epidemiological studies employing biomarker data. The tool proved to be reliable for use by biomedical scientists with diverse backgrounds and could facilitate comprehensive review of biomarker studies in human research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0583-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6219097/ /pubmed/30400827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0583-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wirsching, Jan Graßmann, Sophie Eichelmann, Fabian Harms, Laura Malin Schenk, Matthew Barth, Eva Berndzen, Alide Olalekan, Moses Sarmini, Leen Zuberer, Hedwig Aleksandrova, Krasimira Development and reliability assessment of a new quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies using biomarker data (BIOCROSS) |
title | Development and reliability assessment of a new quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies using biomarker data (BIOCROSS) |
title_full | Development and reliability assessment of a new quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies using biomarker data (BIOCROSS) |
title_fullStr | Development and reliability assessment of a new quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies using biomarker data (BIOCROSS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and reliability assessment of a new quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies using biomarker data (BIOCROSS) |
title_short | Development and reliability assessment of a new quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies using biomarker data (BIOCROSS) |
title_sort | development and reliability assessment of a new quality appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies using biomarker data (biocross) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0583-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wirschingjan developmentandreliabilityassessmentofanewqualityappraisaltoolforcrosssectionalstudiesusingbiomarkerdatabiocross AT graßmannsophie developmentandreliabilityassessmentofanewqualityappraisaltoolforcrosssectionalstudiesusingbiomarkerdatabiocross AT eichelmannfabian developmentandreliabilityassessmentofanewqualityappraisaltoolforcrosssectionalstudiesusingbiomarkerdatabiocross AT harmslauramalin developmentandreliabilityassessmentofanewqualityappraisaltoolforcrosssectionalstudiesusingbiomarkerdatabiocross AT schenkmatthew developmentandreliabilityassessmentofanewqualityappraisaltoolforcrosssectionalstudiesusingbiomarkerdatabiocross AT bartheva developmentandreliabilityassessmentofanewqualityappraisaltoolforcrosssectionalstudiesusingbiomarkerdatabiocross AT berndzenalide developmentandreliabilityassessmentofanewqualityappraisaltoolforcrosssectionalstudiesusingbiomarkerdatabiocross AT olalekanmoses developmentandreliabilityassessmentofanewqualityappraisaltoolforcrosssectionalstudiesusingbiomarkerdatabiocross AT sarminileen developmentandreliabilityassessmentofanewqualityappraisaltoolforcrosssectionalstudiesusingbiomarkerdatabiocross AT zubererhedwig developmentandreliabilityassessmentofanewqualityappraisaltoolforcrosssectionalstudiesusingbiomarkerdatabiocross AT aleksandrovakrasimira developmentandreliabilityassessmentofanewqualityappraisaltoolforcrosssectionalstudiesusingbiomarkerdatabiocross |