Cargando…

Treatment before macular grid in patients of diabetic macular edema

AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab and posterior subtenons triamcinolone acetate in the management of diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME) and to evaluate their efficacy as an adjunct to modified grid laser in management of DME. DESIGN: This was a prosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srilatha, P. S., Wadhwani, Meenakshi, Vohra, Rajpal, Gogia, Varun, Garg, Satpal, Pandey, Veena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30505117
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_148_2016
_version_ 1783368637480960000
author Srilatha, P. S.
Wadhwani, Meenakshi
Vohra, Rajpal
Gogia, Varun
Garg, Satpal
Pandey, Veena
author_facet Srilatha, P. S.
Wadhwani, Meenakshi
Vohra, Rajpal
Gogia, Varun
Garg, Satpal
Pandey, Veena
author_sort Srilatha, P. S.
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab and posterior subtenons triamcinolone acetate in the management of diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME) and to evaluate their efficacy as an adjunct to modified grid laser in management of DME. DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial of 30 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 patients attending the medical ophthalmology clinic at a tertiary care hospital were included in the study. These 30 patients were divided into two groups. Group I (15 eyes) received intravitreal bevacizumab followed by modified grid photocoagulation 2 weeks after injection. Group II (15 eyes) received posterior subtenons triamcinolone followed by modified grid photocoagulation 2 weeks after injection. Each patient in our study was followed up at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months after the initial injection to record the central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). RESULTS: Both the combination therapies have efficacy to reduce the CMT (P = 0.001). The percentage fall in CMT was greater in bevacizumab + laser group, and there was a significant difference in the CMT values at the end of the study in the bevacizumab group (P = 0.013). The mean BCVA improved in both the groups and this difference was statistically significant compared to the baseline (P = 0.005). However, there was no statistically significant difference in BCVA between the two groups at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Both intravitreal bevacizumab and posterior subtenons triamcinolone given as an adjuvant therapy along with modified grid laser are equally efficacious in the reduction of the CMT; however, the percentage fall in the CMT was greater in bevacizumab + laser group, and there was a significant difference in the fall in CMT at all the visits as compared to a plateau in the fall of CMT in posterior subtenons triamcinolone group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6219319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62193192018-11-30 Treatment before macular grid in patients of diabetic macular edema Srilatha, P. S. Wadhwani, Meenakshi Vohra, Rajpal Gogia, Varun Garg, Satpal Pandey, Veena Oman J Ophthalmol Original Article AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab and posterior subtenons triamcinolone acetate in the management of diffuse diabetic macular edema (DME) and to evaluate their efficacy as an adjunct to modified grid laser in management of DME. DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial of 30 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 patients attending the medical ophthalmology clinic at a tertiary care hospital were included in the study. These 30 patients were divided into two groups. Group I (15 eyes) received intravitreal bevacizumab followed by modified grid photocoagulation 2 weeks after injection. Group II (15 eyes) received posterior subtenons triamcinolone followed by modified grid photocoagulation 2 weeks after injection. Each patient in our study was followed up at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months after the initial injection to record the central macular thickness (CMT) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). RESULTS: Both the combination therapies have efficacy to reduce the CMT (P = 0.001). The percentage fall in CMT was greater in bevacizumab + laser group, and there was a significant difference in the CMT values at the end of the study in the bevacizumab group (P = 0.013). The mean BCVA improved in both the groups and this difference was statistically significant compared to the baseline (P = 0.005). However, there was no statistically significant difference in BCVA between the two groups at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Both intravitreal bevacizumab and posterior subtenons triamcinolone given as an adjuvant therapy along with modified grid laser are equally efficacious in the reduction of the CMT; however, the percentage fall in the CMT was greater in bevacizumab + laser group, and there was a significant difference in the fall in CMT at all the visits as compared to a plateau in the fall of CMT in posterior subtenons triamcinolone group. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6219319/ /pubmed/30505117 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_148_2016 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Oman Ophthalmic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Srilatha, P. S.
Wadhwani, Meenakshi
Vohra, Rajpal
Gogia, Varun
Garg, Satpal
Pandey, Veena
Treatment before macular grid in patients of diabetic macular edema
title Treatment before macular grid in patients of diabetic macular edema
title_full Treatment before macular grid in patients of diabetic macular edema
title_fullStr Treatment before macular grid in patients of diabetic macular edema
title_full_unstemmed Treatment before macular grid in patients of diabetic macular edema
title_short Treatment before macular grid in patients of diabetic macular edema
title_sort treatment before macular grid in patients of diabetic macular edema
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30505117
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_148_2016
work_keys_str_mv AT srilathaps treatmentbeforemaculargridinpatientsofdiabeticmacularedema
AT wadhwanimeenakshi treatmentbeforemaculargridinpatientsofdiabeticmacularedema
AT vohrarajpal treatmentbeforemaculargridinpatientsofdiabeticmacularedema
AT gogiavarun treatmentbeforemaculargridinpatientsofdiabeticmacularedema
AT gargsatpal treatmentbeforemaculargridinpatientsofdiabeticmacularedema
AT pandeyveena treatmentbeforemaculargridinpatientsofdiabeticmacularedema