Cargando…

Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model

BACKGROUND: In this study, we investigated the subdermal and perforator delay phenomena as a method to improve flap survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, we used 24 rats in three groups. In the control group, the dorsal flaps were elevated and reinserted back to their place. I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altinel, Dincer, Biltekin, Burcu, Serin, Merdan, Sahin, Ugur, Altindas, Muzaffer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30505091
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_28_17
_version_ 1783368644210720768
author Altinel, Dincer
Biltekin, Burcu
Serin, Merdan
Sahin, Ugur
Altindas, Muzaffer
author_facet Altinel, Dincer
Biltekin, Burcu
Serin, Merdan
Sahin, Ugur
Altindas, Muzaffer
author_sort Altinel, Dincer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this study, we investigated the subdermal and perforator delay phenomena as a method to improve flap survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, we used 24 rats in three groups. In the control group, the dorsal flaps were elevated and reinserted back to their place. In the experimental groups, we practiced the delay phenomena with two different techniques. In the first experimental group, cranial and lateral side incisions were performed; however, the flaps were not cut-off from the underlying fascia. In the second experimental group, we placed a silicon sheet under the planned flap to cut-off the circulation from the perforator vessels. Four weeks after the delay procedure, the flaps were raised completely and reinserted back to their place. RESULTS: The average of necrotic area in the control group was 21.9% (±7.70). There was no necrosis in both experimental groups (P < 0.0001). Histological examination revealed that collagen density in both of the experimental groups was increased in comparison to the control group, it has only been found a significant first experimental group (P = 0.0315). We have not found any significant difference in lymphocyte density between the groups. Angiographic imaging has showed an increase in the vascular density in the flaps of the first experimental group. CONCLUSION: We believe that both of these delay techniques can be adapted to clinical applications and used safely to increase flap survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6219347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62193472018-11-30 Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model Altinel, Dincer Biltekin, Burcu Serin, Merdan Sahin, Ugur Altindas, Muzaffer Indian J Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: In this study, we investigated the subdermal and perforator delay phenomena as a method to improve flap survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, we used 24 rats in three groups. In the control group, the dorsal flaps were elevated and reinserted back to their place. In the experimental groups, we practiced the delay phenomena with two different techniques. In the first experimental group, cranial and lateral side incisions were performed; however, the flaps were not cut-off from the underlying fascia. In the second experimental group, we placed a silicon sheet under the planned flap to cut-off the circulation from the perforator vessels. Four weeks after the delay procedure, the flaps were raised completely and reinserted back to their place. RESULTS: The average of necrotic area in the control group was 21.9% (±7.70). There was no necrosis in both experimental groups (P < 0.0001). Histological examination revealed that collagen density in both of the experimental groups was increased in comparison to the control group, it has only been found a significant first experimental group (P = 0.0315). We have not found any significant difference in lymphocyte density between the groups. Angiographic imaging has showed an increase in the vascular density in the flaps of the first experimental group. CONCLUSION: We believe that both of these delay techniques can be adapted to clinical applications and used safely to increase flap survival. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6219347/ /pubmed/30505091 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_28_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Altinel, Dincer
Biltekin, Burcu
Serin, Merdan
Sahin, Ugur
Altindas, Muzaffer
Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model
title Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model
title_full Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model
title_fullStr Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model
title_short Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model
title_sort comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30505091
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_28_17
work_keys_str_mv AT altineldincer comparisonofsubdermalandperforatordelaytechniquesonaratflapmodel
AT biltekinburcu comparisonofsubdermalandperforatordelaytechniquesonaratflapmodel
AT serinmerdan comparisonofsubdermalandperforatordelaytechniquesonaratflapmodel
AT sahinugur comparisonofsubdermalandperforatordelaytechniquesonaratflapmodel
AT altindasmuzaffer comparisonofsubdermalandperforatordelaytechniquesonaratflapmodel