Cargando…
Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model
BACKGROUND: In this study, we investigated the subdermal and perforator delay phenomena as a method to improve flap survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, we used 24 rats in three groups. In the control group, the dorsal flaps were elevated and reinserted back to their place. I...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30505091 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_28_17 |
_version_ | 1783368644210720768 |
---|---|
author | Altinel, Dincer Biltekin, Burcu Serin, Merdan Sahin, Ugur Altindas, Muzaffer |
author_facet | Altinel, Dincer Biltekin, Burcu Serin, Merdan Sahin, Ugur Altindas, Muzaffer |
author_sort | Altinel, Dincer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In this study, we investigated the subdermal and perforator delay phenomena as a method to improve flap survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, we used 24 rats in three groups. In the control group, the dorsal flaps were elevated and reinserted back to their place. In the experimental groups, we practiced the delay phenomena with two different techniques. In the first experimental group, cranial and lateral side incisions were performed; however, the flaps were not cut-off from the underlying fascia. In the second experimental group, we placed a silicon sheet under the planned flap to cut-off the circulation from the perforator vessels. Four weeks after the delay procedure, the flaps were raised completely and reinserted back to their place. RESULTS: The average of necrotic area in the control group was 21.9% (±7.70). There was no necrosis in both experimental groups (P < 0.0001). Histological examination revealed that collagen density in both of the experimental groups was increased in comparison to the control group, it has only been found a significant first experimental group (P = 0.0315). We have not found any significant difference in lymphocyte density between the groups. Angiographic imaging has showed an increase in the vascular density in the flaps of the first experimental group. CONCLUSION: We believe that both of these delay techniques can be adapted to clinical applications and used safely to increase flap survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6219347 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62193472018-11-30 Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model Altinel, Dincer Biltekin, Burcu Serin, Merdan Sahin, Ugur Altindas, Muzaffer Indian J Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: In this study, we investigated the subdermal and perforator delay phenomena as a method to improve flap survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, we used 24 rats in three groups. In the control group, the dorsal flaps were elevated and reinserted back to their place. In the experimental groups, we practiced the delay phenomena with two different techniques. In the first experimental group, cranial and lateral side incisions were performed; however, the flaps were not cut-off from the underlying fascia. In the second experimental group, we placed a silicon sheet under the planned flap to cut-off the circulation from the perforator vessels. Four weeks after the delay procedure, the flaps were raised completely and reinserted back to their place. RESULTS: The average of necrotic area in the control group was 21.9% (±7.70). There was no necrosis in both experimental groups (P < 0.0001). Histological examination revealed that collagen density in both of the experimental groups was increased in comparison to the control group, it has only been found a significant first experimental group (P = 0.0315). We have not found any significant difference in lymphocyte density between the groups. Angiographic imaging has showed an increase in the vascular density in the flaps of the first experimental group. CONCLUSION: We believe that both of these delay techniques can be adapted to clinical applications and used safely to increase flap survival. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6219347/ /pubmed/30505091 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_28_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Altinel, Dincer Biltekin, Burcu Serin, Merdan Sahin, Ugur Altindas, Muzaffer Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model |
title | Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model |
title_full | Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model |
title_fullStr | Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model |
title_short | Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model |
title_sort | comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30505091 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_28_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT altineldincer comparisonofsubdermalandperforatordelaytechniquesonaratflapmodel AT biltekinburcu comparisonofsubdermalandperforatordelaytechniquesonaratflapmodel AT serinmerdan comparisonofsubdermalandperforatordelaytechniquesonaratflapmodel AT sahinugur comparisonofsubdermalandperforatordelaytechniquesonaratflapmodel AT altindasmuzaffer comparisonofsubdermalandperforatordelaytechniquesonaratflapmodel |