Cargando…

Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients

BACKGROUND: Insecure attachment patterns are related to the onset and development of chronic pain. However, it is less documented on how short- and long-term effects of pain therapy might differ with the attachment style in interaction with specific pain conditions. We therefore examined how two dif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfeifer, Ann-Christin, Penedo, Juan Martin Gómez, Ehrenthal, Johannes C, Neubauer, Eva, Amelung, Dorothee, Schroeter, Corinna, Schiltenwolf, Marcus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464583
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S165487
_version_ 1783368657304289280
author Pfeifer, Ann-Christin
Penedo, Juan Martin Gómez
Ehrenthal, Johannes C
Neubauer, Eva
Amelung, Dorothee
Schroeter, Corinna
Schiltenwolf, Marcus
author_facet Pfeifer, Ann-Christin
Penedo, Juan Martin Gómez
Ehrenthal, Johannes C
Neubauer, Eva
Amelung, Dorothee
Schroeter, Corinna
Schiltenwolf, Marcus
author_sort Pfeifer, Ann-Christin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Insecure attachment patterns are related to the onset and development of chronic pain. However, it is less documented on how short- and long-term effects of pain therapy might differ with the attachment style in interaction with specific pain conditions. We therefore examined how two different groups of chronic pain patients differ in their treatment trajectories and in regard to attachment. METHOD: N=85/76/67 (T1/T2/T3) patients with medically unexplained musculoskeletal pain (UMP group) were compared to n=89/76/56 patients with joint pain from osteoarthritis (OA group), using multilevel modeling. UMP patients received a multimodal pain program, and OA patients received surgery. Pain intensity before (T1) and after (T2) treatment and at a 6 months follow-up (T3) was assessed by using a visual analog scale of pain. RESULTS: Pain patients report a significant reduction in pain intensity upon the completion of the treatment compared to T1. Over the next 6 months, the pain intensity has further declined for patients with low attachment anxiety. In contrast, patients with highly anxious attachment report an increase in pain intensity. This main effect of anxious attachment on pain is significant when predicting changes both in acute treatment and during follow-up while controlling for group effect. In addition, there is also an interactive effect of group by avoidant attachment. In the UMP group, high scores in avoidant attachment were associated with the lower reduction in pain severity, while in the OA group, high scores in attachment avoidance were associated with a steeper reduction in pain severity. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that insecurely attached patients with pain symptoms only benefit from a multimodal pain therapy in limited ways in regard to posttreatment trajectories. Maintaining positive results over a period of 6 months is a challenge, compared with securely attached patients. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study suggest the importance of direct and indirect mechanisms of attachment and its relevance for the management of pain experiences. Therefore, to include the individual attachment patterns in the treatment may be a promising way to enhance the treatment prospects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6219424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62194242018-11-21 Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients Pfeifer, Ann-Christin Penedo, Juan Martin Gómez Ehrenthal, Johannes C Neubauer, Eva Amelung, Dorothee Schroeter, Corinna Schiltenwolf, Marcus J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Insecure attachment patterns are related to the onset and development of chronic pain. However, it is less documented on how short- and long-term effects of pain therapy might differ with the attachment style in interaction with specific pain conditions. We therefore examined how two different groups of chronic pain patients differ in their treatment trajectories and in regard to attachment. METHOD: N=85/76/67 (T1/T2/T3) patients with medically unexplained musculoskeletal pain (UMP group) were compared to n=89/76/56 patients with joint pain from osteoarthritis (OA group), using multilevel modeling. UMP patients received a multimodal pain program, and OA patients received surgery. Pain intensity before (T1) and after (T2) treatment and at a 6 months follow-up (T3) was assessed by using a visual analog scale of pain. RESULTS: Pain patients report a significant reduction in pain intensity upon the completion of the treatment compared to T1. Over the next 6 months, the pain intensity has further declined for patients with low attachment anxiety. In contrast, patients with highly anxious attachment report an increase in pain intensity. This main effect of anxious attachment on pain is significant when predicting changes both in acute treatment and during follow-up while controlling for group effect. In addition, there is also an interactive effect of group by avoidant attachment. In the UMP group, high scores in avoidant attachment were associated with the lower reduction in pain severity, while in the OA group, high scores in attachment avoidance were associated with a steeper reduction in pain severity. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that insecurely attached patients with pain symptoms only benefit from a multimodal pain therapy in limited ways in regard to posttreatment trajectories. Maintaining positive results over a period of 6 months is a challenge, compared with securely attached patients. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study suggest the importance of direct and indirect mechanisms of attachment and its relevance for the management of pain experiences. Therefore, to include the individual attachment patterns in the treatment may be a promising way to enhance the treatment prospects. Dove Medical Press 2018-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6219424/ /pubmed/30464583 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S165487 Text en © 2018 Pfeifer et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pfeifer, Ann-Christin
Penedo, Juan Martin Gómez
Ehrenthal, Johannes C
Neubauer, Eva
Amelung, Dorothee
Schroeter, Corinna
Schiltenwolf, Marcus
Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
title Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
title_full Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
title_fullStr Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
title_full_unstemmed Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
title_short Impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
title_sort impact of attachment behavior on the treatment process of chronic pain patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464583
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S165487
work_keys_str_mv AT pfeiferannchristin impactofattachmentbehavioronthetreatmentprocessofchronicpainpatients
AT penedojuanmartingomez impactofattachmentbehavioronthetreatmentprocessofchronicpainpatients
AT ehrenthaljohannesc impactofattachmentbehavioronthetreatmentprocessofchronicpainpatients
AT neubauereva impactofattachmentbehavioronthetreatmentprocessofchronicpainpatients
AT amelungdorothee impactofattachmentbehavioronthetreatmentprocessofchronicpainpatients
AT schroetercorinna impactofattachmentbehavioronthetreatmentprocessofchronicpainpatients
AT schiltenwolfmarcus impactofattachmentbehavioronthetreatmentprocessofchronicpainpatients