Cargando…

First Precambrian palaeomagnetic data from the Mawson Craton (East Antarctica) and tectonic implications

A pilot palaeomagnetic study was conducted on the recently dated with in situ SHRIMP U-Pb method at 1134 ± 9 Ma (U-Pb, zircon and baddeleyite) Bunger Hills dykes of the Mawson Craton (East Antarctica). Of the six dykes sampled, three revealed meaningful results providing the first well-dated Mesopro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yebo, Li, Zheng-Xiang, Pisarevsky, Sergei A., Kirscher, Uwe, Mitchell, Ross N., Stark, J. Camilla, Clark, Chris, Hand, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30401799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34748-2
_version_ 1783368679543537664
author Liu, Yebo
Li, Zheng-Xiang
Pisarevsky, Sergei A.
Kirscher, Uwe
Mitchell, Ross N.
Stark, J. Camilla
Clark, Chris
Hand, Martin
author_facet Liu, Yebo
Li, Zheng-Xiang
Pisarevsky, Sergei A.
Kirscher, Uwe
Mitchell, Ross N.
Stark, J. Camilla
Clark, Chris
Hand, Martin
author_sort Liu, Yebo
collection PubMed
description A pilot palaeomagnetic study was conducted on the recently dated with in situ SHRIMP U-Pb method at 1134 ± 9 Ma (U-Pb, zircon and baddeleyite) Bunger Hills dykes of the Mawson Craton (East Antarctica). Of the six dykes sampled, three revealed meaningful results providing the first well-dated Mesoproterozoic palaeopole at 40.5°S, 150.1°E (A(95) = 20°) for the Mawson Craton. Discordance between this new pole and two roughly coeval poles from Dronning Maud Land and Coats Land (East Antarctica) demonstrates that these two terranes were not rigidly connected to the Mawson Craton ca. 1134 Ma. Comparison between the new pole and that of the broadly coeval Lakeview dolerite from the North Australian Craton supports the putative ~40° late Neoproterozoic relative rotation between the North Australian Craton and the combined South and West Australian cratons. A mean ca. 1134 Ma pole for the Proto-Australia Craton is calculated by combining our new pole and that of the Lakeview dolerite after restoring the 40° intracontinental rotation. A comparison of this mean pole with the roughly coeval Abitibi dykes pole from Laurentia confirms that the SWEAT reconstruction of Australia and Laurentia was not viable for ca. 1134 Ma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6219563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62195632018-11-07 First Precambrian palaeomagnetic data from the Mawson Craton (East Antarctica) and tectonic implications Liu, Yebo Li, Zheng-Xiang Pisarevsky, Sergei A. Kirscher, Uwe Mitchell, Ross N. Stark, J. Camilla Clark, Chris Hand, Martin Sci Rep Article A pilot palaeomagnetic study was conducted on the recently dated with in situ SHRIMP U-Pb method at 1134 ± 9 Ma (U-Pb, zircon and baddeleyite) Bunger Hills dykes of the Mawson Craton (East Antarctica). Of the six dykes sampled, three revealed meaningful results providing the first well-dated Mesoproterozoic palaeopole at 40.5°S, 150.1°E (A(95) = 20°) for the Mawson Craton. Discordance between this new pole and two roughly coeval poles from Dronning Maud Land and Coats Land (East Antarctica) demonstrates that these two terranes were not rigidly connected to the Mawson Craton ca. 1134 Ma. Comparison between the new pole and that of the broadly coeval Lakeview dolerite from the North Australian Craton supports the putative ~40° late Neoproterozoic relative rotation between the North Australian Craton and the combined South and West Australian cratons. A mean ca. 1134 Ma pole for the Proto-Australia Craton is calculated by combining our new pole and that of the Lakeview dolerite after restoring the 40° intracontinental rotation. A comparison of this mean pole with the roughly coeval Abitibi dykes pole from Laurentia confirms that the SWEAT reconstruction of Australia and Laurentia was not viable for ca. 1134 Ma. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6219563/ /pubmed/30401799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34748-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Yebo
Li, Zheng-Xiang
Pisarevsky, Sergei A.
Kirscher, Uwe
Mitchell, Ross N.
Stark, J. Camilla
Clark, Chris
Hand, Martin
First Precambrian palaeomagnetic data from the Mawson Craton (East Antarctica) and tectonic implications
title First Precambrian palaeomagnetic data from the Mawson Craton (East Antarctica) and tectonic implications
title_full First Precambrian palaeomagnetic data from the Mawson Craton (East Antarctica) and tectonic implications
title_fullStr First Precambrian palaeomagnetic data from the Mawson Craton (East Antarctica) and tectonic implications
title_full_unstemmed First Precambrian palaeomagnetic data from the Mawson Craton (East Antarctica) and tectonic implications
title_short First Precambrian palaeomagnetic data from the Mawson Craton (East Antarctica) and tectonic implications
title_sort first precambrian palaeomagnetic data from the mawson craton (east antarctica) and tectonic implications
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30401799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34748-2
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyebo firstprecambrianpalaeomagneticdatafromthemawsoncratoneastantarcticaandtectonicimplications
AT lizhengxiang firstprecambrianpalaeomagneticdatafromthemawsoncratoneastantarcticaandtectonicimplications
AT pisarevskysergeia firstprecambrianpalaeomagneticdatafromthemawsoncratoneastantarcticaandtectonicimplications
AT kirscheruwe firstprecambrianpalaeomagneticdatafromthemawsoncratoneastantarcticaandtectonicimplications
AT mitchellrossn firstprecambrianpalaeomagneticdatafromthemawsoncratoneastantarcticaandtectonicimplications
AT starkjcamilla firstprecambrianpalaeomagneticdatafromthemawsoncratoneastantarcticaandtectonicimplications
AT clarkchris firstprecambrianpalaeomagneticdatafromthemawsoncratoneastantarcticaandtectonicimplications
AT handmartin firstprecambrianpalaeomagneticdatafromthemawsoncratoneastantarcticaandtectonicimplications