Effect of Proxy Responses on Tobacco Use Surveys in Thailand, 2011

Proxy responses are often allowed in household tobacco surveys when all household members are included in a sample. To assess the effect of proxy responses on prevalence estimates, we compared 2 surveys in 2011 that gauged tobacco use in Thailand: the Cigarette Smoking and Alcohol Drinking Survey (S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsia, Jason, Puckcharern, Hataichanok, Town, Machell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2018
Materias:
Brief
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219849/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30367719
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.180158
Descripción
Sumario:Proxy responses are often allowed in household tobacco surveys when all household members are included in a sample. To assess the effect of proxy responses on prevalence estimates, we compared 2 surveys in 2011 that gauged tobacco use in Thailand: the Cigarette Smoking and Alcohol Drinking Survey (SADS) and the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS). Both surveys had similar nonsampling errors and design, but SADS allowed proxy responses and GATS did not. When proxy responses were included in SADS, the prevalence estimate was 10% lower in GATS for men (41.69% in GATS vs 46.55% in SADS) and 18% lower in GATS for women (2.14% in GATS vs 2.61% in SADS). Eliminating proxy responses is recommended to increase accuracy of tobacco-use surveillance.

Ejemplares similares