Cargando…
The mitigating effect of repeated memory reactivations on forgetting
Memory reactivation is a process whereby cueing or recalling a long-term memory makes it enter a new active and labile state. Substantial evidence suggests that during this state the memory can be updated (e.g., adding information) and can become more vulnerable to disruption (e.g., brain insult). M...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30631470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0025-x |
_version_ | 1783368807549501440 |
---|---|
author | MacLeod, Sydney Reynolds, Michael G. Lehmann, Hugo |
author_facet | MacLeod, Sydney Reynolds, Michael G. Lehmann, Hugo |
author_sort | MacLeod, Sydney |
collection | PubMed |
description | Memory reactivation is a process whereby cueing or recalling a long-term memory makes it enter a new active and labile state. Substantial evidence suggests that during this state the memory can be updated (e.g., adding information) and can become more vulnerable to disruption (e.g., brain insult). Memory reactivations can also prevent memory decay or forgetting. However, it is unclear whether cueing recall of a feature or component of the memory can benefit retention similarly to promoting recall of the entire memory. We examined this possibility by having participants view a series of neutral images and then randomly assigning them to one of four reactivation groups: control (no reactivation), distractor (reactivation of experimental procedures), component (image category reactivation), and descriptive (effortful description of the images). The experiment also included three retention intervals: 1 h, 9 days, and 28 days. Importantly, the participants received three reactivations equally spaced within their respective retention interval. At the end of the interval, all the participants were given an in-lab free-recall test in which they were asked to write down each image they remembered with as many details as possible. The data revealed that both the participants in the descriptive reactivation and component reactivation groups remembered significantly more than the participants in the control groups, with the effect being most pronounced in the 28-day retention interval condition. These findings suggest that memory reactivation, even component reactivation of a memory, makes memories more resistant to decay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6220336 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62203362019-01-10 The mitigating effect of repeated memory reactivations on forgetting MacLeod, Sydney Reynolds, Michael G. Lehmann, Hugo NPJ Sci Learn Article Memory reactivation is a process whereby cueing or recalling a long-term memory makes it enter a new active and labile state. Substantial evidence suggests that during this state the memory can be updated (e.g., adding information) and can become more vulnerable to disruption (e.g., brain insult). Memory reactivations can also prevent memory decay or forgetting. However, it is unclear whether cueing recall of a feature or component of the memory can benefit retention similarly to promoting recall of the entire memory. We examined this possibility by having participants view a series of neutral images and then randomly assigning them to one of four reactivation groups: control (no reactivation), distractor (reactivation of experimental procedures), component (image category reactivation), and descriptive (effortful description of the images). The experiment also included three retention intervals: 1 h, 9 days, and 28 days. Importantly, the participants received three reactivations equally spaced within their respective retention interval. At the end of the interval, all the participants were given an in-lab free-recall test in which they were asked to write down each image they remembered with as many details as possible. The data revealed that both the participants in the descriptive reactivation and component reactivation groups remembered significantly more than the participants in the control groups, with the effect being most pronounced in the 28-day retention interval condition. These findings suggest that memory reactivation, even component reactivation of a memory, makes memories more resistant to decay. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6220336/ /pubmed/30631470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0025-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article MacLeod, Sydney Reynolds, Michael G. Lehmann, Hugo The mitigating effect of repeated memory reactivations on forgetting |
title | The mitigating effect of repeated memory reactivations on forgetting |
title_full | The mitigating effect of repeated memory reactivations on forgetting |
title_fullStr | The mitigating effect of repeated memory reactivations on forgetting |
title_full_unstemmed | The mitigating effect of repeated memory reactivations on forgetting |
title_short | The mitigating effect of repeated memory reactivations on forgetting |
title_sort | mitigating effect of repeated memory reactivations on forgetting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30631470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0025-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT macleodsydney themitigatingeffectofrepeatedmemoryreactivationsonforgetting AT reynoldsmichaelg themitigatingeffectofrepeatedmemoryreactivationsonforgetting AT lehmannhugo themitigatingeffectofrepeatedmemoryreactivationsonforgetting AT macleodsydney mitigatingeffectofrepeatedmemoryreactivationsonforgetting AT reynoldsmichaelg mitigatingeffectofrepeatedmemoryreactivationsonforgetting AT lehmannhugo mitigatingeffectofrepeatedmemoryreactivationsonforgetting |