Cargando…

Barriers in general practitioners’ dementia diagnostics among people with a migration background in Germany (BaDeMi) - study protocol for a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND: Considering the targeted general practitioner-centred healthcare in Germany, general practitioners (GPs) are in the best possible position to increase awareness of all sorts of dementia, an age-related syndrome with rising relevance in the future. In Germany, a doubling of the number of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tillmann, Judith, Schnakenberg, Rieke, Puth, Marie-Therese, Weckbecker, Klaus, Just, Johannes, Münster, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0580-0
_version_ 1783368838819086336
author Tillmann, Judith
Schnakenberg, Rieke
Puth, Marie-Therese
Weckbecker, Klaus
Just, Johannes
Münster, Eva
author_facet Tillmann, Judith
Schnakenberg, Rieke
Puth, Marie-Therese
Weckbecker, Klaus
Just, Johannes
Münster, Eva
author_sort Tillmann, Judith
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Considering the targeted general practitioner-centred healthcare in Germany, general practitioners (GPs) are in the best possible position to increase awareness of all sorts of dementia, an age-related syndrome with rising relevance in the future. In Germany, a doubling of the number of cases from 1.55 million up to 3 million in 2050 is predicted. Diagnostics can be challenging, especially among patients with a migration background. Complicating factors include: Language-based diagnostic tools, cultural differences in handling the syndrome and its underlying diseases as well as a differing use of the healthcare system. Because of missing research in this field in Germany, the type, frequency and intensity of barriers as well as the way GPs cope with them is unknown. That is why it’s crucial to focus research on diagnostics in total and especially among this population group. METHODS: A cross-sectional study among a random sample of 1000 general practitioners in Germany is conducted in October 2017. A self-administered standardized questionnaire was developed, evaluated and send to the GP practices. A response rate of 30% is expected with one reminder letter. Descriptive statistics as well as, depending on the results, multivariable analyses will be executed. Based on these results and the stated needs, a cluster-randomized intervention study will be constructed to improve healthcare. DISCUSSION: This study is the first in Germany focusing on how dementia diagnostics in general practice is performed, what problems occur, especially because of a migration background of patients, and how GPs cope with them. Depending on the results, it should emphasize the necessity of dementia diagnostics to be adjusted to the needs of the rising amount of people with a migration background (22.5% in Germany, 2016) like concluded from international studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00012503, date of registration: 05.09.2017. Clinical register of the study coordination office of the University hospital of Bonn: ID530, date of registration: 05.09.2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6220477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62204772018-11-16 Barriers in general practitioners’ dementia diagnostics among people with a migration background in Germany (BaDeMi) - study protocol for a cross-sectional survey Tillmann, Judith Schnakenberg, Rieke Puth, Marie-Therese Weckbecker, Klaus Just, Johannes Münster, Eva BMC Med Res Methodol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Considering the targeted general practitioner-centred healthcare in Germany, general practitioners (GPs) are in the best possible position to increase awareness of all sorts of dementia, an age-related syndrome with rising relevance in the future. In Germany, a doubling of the number of cases from 1.55 million up to 3 million in 2050 is predicted. Diagnostics can be challenging, especially among patients with a migration background. Complicating factors include: Language-based diagnostic tools, cultural differences in handling the syndrome and its underlying diseases as well as a differing use of the healthcare system. Because of missing research in this field in Germany, the type, frequency and intensity of barriers as well as the way GPs cope with them is unknown. That is why it’s crucial to focus research on diagnostics in total and especially among this population group. METHODS: A cross-sectional study among a random sample of 1000 general practitioners in Germany is conducted in October 2017. A self-administered standardized questionnaire was developed, evaluated and send to the GP practices. A response rate of 30% is expected with one reminder letter. Descriptive statistics as well as, depending on the results, multivariable analyses will be executed. Based on these results and the stated needs, a cluster-randomized intervention study will be constructed to improve healthcare. DISCUSSION: This study is the first in Germany focusing on how dementia diagnostics in general practice is performed, what problems occur, especially because of a migration background of patients, and how GPs cope with them. Depending on the results, it should emphasize the necessity of dementia diagnostics to be adjusted to the needs of the rising amount of people with a migration background (22.5% in Germany, 2016) like concluded from international studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00012503, date of registration: 05.09.2017. Clinical register of the study coordination office of the University hospital of Bonn: ID530, date of registration: 05.09.2017. BioMed Central 2018-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6220477/ /pubmed/30400773 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0580-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Tillmann, Judith
Schnakenberg, Rieke
Puth, Marie-Therese
Weckbecker, Klaus
Just, Johannes
Münster, Eva
Barriers in general practitioners’ dementia diagnostics among people with a migration background in Germany (BaDeMi) - study protocol for a cross-sectional survey
title Barriers in general practitioners’ dementia diagnostics among people with a migration background in Germany (BaDeMi) - study protocol for a cross-sectional survey
title_full Barriers in general practitioners’ dementia diagnostics among people with a migration background in Germany (BaDeMi) - study protocol for a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Barriers in general practitioners’ dementia diagnostics among people with a migration background in Germany (BaDeMi) - study protocol for a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Barriers in general practitioners’ dementia diagnostics among people with a migration background in Germany (BaDeMi) - study protocol for a cross-sectional survey
title_short Barriers in general practitioners’ dementia diagnostics among people with a migration background in Germany (BaDeMi) - study protocol for a cross-sectional survey
title_sort barriers in general practitioners’ dementia diagnostics among people with a migration background in germany (bademi) - study protocol for a cross-sectional survey
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400773
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0580-0
work_keys_str_mv AT tillmannjudith barriersingeneralpractitionersdementiadiagnosticsamongpeoplewithamigrationbackgroundingermanybademistudyprotocolforacrosssectionalsurvey
AT schnakenbergrieke barriersingeneralpractitionersdementiadiagnosticsamongpeoplewithamigrationbackgroundingermanybademistudyprotocolforacrosssectionalsurvey
AT puthmarietherese barriersingeneralpractitionersdementiadiagnosticsamongpeoplewithamigrationbackgroundingermanybademistudyprotocolforacrosssectionalsurvey
AT weckbeckerklaus barriersingeneralpractitionersdementiadiagnosticsamongpeoplewithamigrationbackgroundingermanybademistudyprotocolforacrosssectionalsurvey
AT justjohannes barriersingeneralpractitionersdementiadiagnosticsamongpeoplewithamigrationbackgroundingermanybademistudyprotocolforacrosssectionalsurvey
AT munstereva barriersingeneralpractitionersdementiadiagnosticsamongpeoplewithamigrationbackgroundingermanybademistudyprotocolforacrosssectionalsurvey