Cargando…
Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set
BACKGROUND: The concept of informed consent is fundamental to medical practice. Shortcomings in the process can lead to patient complaints, litigation, unmet expectations and poor outcomes. Consent research has focused on developing tools to improve patient recall and understanding. However, the def...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2986-8 |
_version_ | 1783368845925285888 |
---|---|
author | Convie, Liam J. McCain, Scott Campbell, Jeffrey Kirk, Stephen J. Clarke, Mike |
author_facet | Convie, Liam J. McCain, Scott Campbell, Jeffrey Kirk, Stephen J. Clarke, Mike |
author_sort | Convie, Liam J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The concept of informed consent is fundamental to medical practice. Shortcomings in the process can lead to patient complaints, litigation, unmet expectations and poor outcomes. Consent research has focused on developing tools to improve patient recall and understanding. However, the definitions, methods of measurement and timing of measurement vary widely across the studies that have been done. Although a Cochrane review has reported that many of these interventions appear to work, the high level of heterogeneity in outcome reporting prevents the identification of those interventions that work best and why they do so. It is also not clear which outcomes are most important to each party involved in the consent process and why. METHODS/DESIGN: This project will develop a core outcome set for assessing the effects of interventions aimed at improving informed consent for surgery and other invasive procedures for adult patients with the capacity to consent for themselves. We will conduct a systematic review of the qualitative and quantitative literature to identify outcomes used to date in consent research and map these into domains. A series of semi-structured key stakeholder interviews will also be used to identify relevant outcomes. These processes will produce a list of potential outcomes for assessing the effects of interventions to improve consent, which will be refined through an international Delphi survey and consensus webinars involving key stakeholders to produce the core outcome set. DISCUSSION: The ICONS study aims to develop a core outcome set for use in trials and reviews of interventions designed to improve the informed consent process for surgery and other invasive procedures. Our aim is that this core outcome set will reduce the level of selection and reporting bias in consent research and help clinicians to compare tools to improve consent. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2986-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6220506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62205062018-11-15 Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set Convie, Liam J. McCain, Scott Campbell, Jeffrey Kirk, Stephen J. Clarke, Mike Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The concept of informed consent is fundamental to medical practice. Shortcomings in the process can lead to patient complaints, litigation, unmet expectations and poor outcomes. Consent research has focused on developing tools to improve patient recall and understanding. However, the definitions, methods of measurement and timing of measurement vary widely across the studies that have been done. Although a Cochrane review has reported that many of these interventions appear to work, the high level of heterogeneity in outcome reporting prevents the identification of those interventions that work best and why they do so. It is also not clear which outcomes are most important to each party involved in the consent process and why. METHODS/DESIGN: This project will develop a core outcome set for assessing the effects of interventions aimed at improving informed consent for surgery and other invasive procedures for adult patients with the capacity to consent for themselves. We will conduct a systematic review of the qualitative and quantitative literature to identify outcomes used to date in consent research and map these into domains. A series of semi-structured key stakeholder interviews will also be used to identify relevant outcomes. These processes will produce a list of potential outcomes for assessing the effects of interventions to improve consent, which will be refined through an international Delphi survey and consensus webinars involving key stakeholders to produce the core outcome set. DISCUSSION: The ICONS study aims to develop a core outcome set for use in trials and reviews of interventions designed to improve the informed consent process for surgery and other invasive procedures. Our aim is that this core outcome set will reduce the level of selection and reporting bias in consent research and help clinicians to compare tools to improve consent. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2986-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6220506/ /pubmed/30400995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2986-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Convie, Liam J. McCain, Scott Campbell, Jeffrey Kirk, Stephen J. Clarke, Mike Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set |
title | Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set |
title_full | Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set |
title_fullStr | Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set |
title_short | Evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (ICONS): Protocol for the development of a core outcome set |
title_sort | evaluating interventions for informed consent for surgery (icons): protocol for the development of a core outcome set |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30400995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2986-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT convieliamj evaluatinginterventionsforinformedconsentforsurgeryiconsprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset AT mccainscott evaluatinginterventionsforinformedconsentforsurgeryiconsprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset AT campbelljeffrey evaluatinginterventionsforinformedconsentforsurgeryiconsprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset AT kirkstephenj evaluatinginterventionsforinformedconsentforsurgeryiconsprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset AT clarkemike evaluatinginterventionsforinformedconsentforsurgeryiconsprotocolforthedevelopmentofacoreoutcomeset |