Cargando…

Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta‐Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study

BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, anticoagulation, and antiplatelet therapy to prevent stroke recurrence in patients with PFO‐associated cryptogenic stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turc, Guillaume, Calvet, David, Guérin, Patrice, Sroussi, Marjorie, Chatellier, Gilles, Mas, Jean‐Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.008356
_version_ 1783368856867176448
author Turc, Guillaume
Calvet, David
Guérin, Patrice
Sroussi, Marjorie
Chatellier, Gilles
Mas, Jean‐Louis
author_facet Turc, Guillaume
Calvet, David
Guérin, Patrice
Sroussi, Marjorie
Chatellier, Gilles
Mas, Jean‐Louis
author_sort Turc, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, anticoagulation, and antiplatelet therapy to prevent stroke recurrence in patients with PFO‐associated cryptogenic stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched Medline, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE through March 2018. The primary outcome was stroke recurrence. Pooled incidences, hazard ratios, and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated in random‐effects meta‐analyses. PFO closure was associated with a lower risk of recurrent stroke compared with antithrombotic therapy (antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation: 3560 patients from 6 RCTs; RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.17–0.79; I(2)=59%). The effect of PFO closure on stroke recurrence was larger in patients with atrial septal aneurysm or large shunt (RR=0.27, 95% CI, 0.11–0.70; I(2)=42%) compared with patients without these anatomical features (RR=0.80, 95% CI, 0.43–1.47; I(2)=12%). Major complications occurred in 2.40% (95% CI, 1.03–4.25; I(2)=77%) of procedures. New‐onset atrial fibrillation was more frequent in patients randomized to PFO closure versus antithrombotic therapy (RR=4.33, 95% CI, 2.37–7.89; I(2)=14%). One RCT compared PFO closure versus anticoagulation (353 patients; hazard ratio=0.14, 95% CI, 0.00–1.45) and 2 RCTs compared PFO closure versus antiplatelet therapy (1137 patients; hazard ratio=0.18, 95% CI, 0.05–0.63; I(2)=12%). Three RCTs compared anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy, with none showing a significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: PFO closure is superior to antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke recurrence after cryptogenic stroke. The annual absolute risk reduction of stroke was low, but it has to be tempered by a substantial time at risk (at least 5 years) in young and middle‐aged patients. PFO closure was associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6220551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62205512018-11-15 Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta‐Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study Turc, Guillaume Calvet, David Guérin, Patrice Sroussi, Marjorie Chatellier, Gilles Mas, Jean‐Louis J Am Heart Assoc Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis BACKGROUND: We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, anticoagulation, and antiplatelet therapy to prevent stroke recurrence in patients with PFO‐associated cryptogenic stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched Medline, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE through March 2018. The primary outcome was stroke recurrence. Pooled incidences, hazard ratios, and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated in random‐effects meta‐analyses. PFO closure was associated with a lower risk of recurrent stroke compared with antithrombotic therapy (antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation: 3560 patients from 6 RCTs; RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.17–0.79; I(2)=59%). The effect of PFO closure on stroke recurrence was larger in patients with atrial septal aneurysm or large shunt (RR=0.27, 95% CI, 0.11–0.70; I(2)=42%) compared with patients without these anatomical features (RR=0.80, 95% CI, 0.43–1.47; I(2)=12%). Major complications occurred in 2.40% (95% CI, 1.03–4.25; I(2)=77%) of procedures. New‐onset atrial fibrillation was more frequent in patients randomized to PFO closure versus antithrombotic therapy (RR=4.33, 95% CI, 2.37–7.89; I(2)=14%). One RCT compared PFO closure versus anticoagulation (353 patients; hazard ratio=0.14, 95% CI, 0.00–1.45) and 2 RCTs compared PFO closure versus antiplatelet therapy (1137 patients; hazard ratio=0.18, 95% CI, 0.05–0.63; I(2)=12%). Three RCTs compared anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy, with none showing a significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: PFO closure is superior to antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke recurrence after cryptogenic stroke. The annual absolute risk reduction of stroke was low, but it has to be tempered by a substantial time at risk (at least 5 years) in young and middle‐aged patients. PFO closure was associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6220551/ /pubmed/29910193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.008356 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Turc, Guillaume
Calvet, David
Guérin, Patrice
Sroussi, Marjorie
Chatellier, Gilles
Mas, Jean‐Louis
Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta‐Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study
title Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta‐Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study
title_full Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta‐Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study
title_fullStr Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta‐Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study
title_full_unstemmed Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta‐Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study
title_short Closure, Anticoagulation, or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke With Patent Foramen Ovale: Systematic Review of Randomized Trials, Sequential Meta‐Analysis, and New Insights From the CLOSE Study
title_sort closure, anticoagulation, or antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale: systematic review of randomized trials, sequential meta‐analysis, and new insights from the close study
topic Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29910193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.008356
work_keys_str_mv AT turcguillaume closureanticoagulationorantiplatelettherapyforcryptogenicstrokewithpatentforamenovalesystematicreviewofrandomizedtrialssequentialmetaanalysisandnewinsightsfromtheclosestudy
AT calvetdavid closureanticoagulationorantiplatelettherapyforcryptogenicstrokewithpatentforamenovalesystematicreviewofrandomizedtrialssequentialmetaanalysisandnewinsightsfromtheclosestudy
AT guerinpatrice closureanticoagulationorantiplatelettherapyforcryptogenicstrokewithpatentforamenovalesystematicreviewofrandomizedtrialssequentialmetaanalysisandnewinsightsfromtheclosestudy
AT sroussimarjorie closureanticoagulationorantiplatelettherapyforcryptogenicstrokewithpatentforamenovalesystematicreviewofrandomizedtrialssequentialmetaanalysisandnewinsightsfromtheclosestudy
AT chatelliergilles closureanticoagulationorantiplatelettherapyforcryptogenicstrokewithpatentforamenovalesystematicreviewofrandomizedtrialssequentialmetaanalysisandnewinsightsfromtheclosestudy
AT masjeanlouis closureanticoagulationorantiplatelettherapyforcryptogenicstrokewithpatentforamenovalesystematicreviewofrandomizedtrialssequentialmetaanalysisandnewinsightsfromtheclosestudy
AT closureanticoagulationorantiplatelettherapyforcryptogenicstrokewithpatentforamenovalesystematicreviewofrandomizedtrialssequentialmetaanalysisandnewinsightsfromtheclosestudy