Cargando…
Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial
OBJECTIVE: No evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) is a novel combined endpoint defined by the absence of both progression and inflammatory disease activity in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). In the placebo‐controlled phase III ORATORIO study (NCT01194570), we investigate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25313 |
_version_ | 1783368890599866368 |
---|---|
author | Wolinsky, Jerry S. Montalban, Xavier Hauser, Stephen L. Giovannoni, Gavin Vermersch, Patrick Bernasconi, Corrado Deol‐Bhullar, Gurpreet Garren, Hideki Chin, Peter Belachew, Shibeshih Kappos, Ludwig |
author_facet | Wolinsky, Jerry S. Montalban, Xavier Hauser, Stephen L. Giovannoni, Gavin Vermersch, Patrick Bernasconi, Corrado Deol‐Bhullar, Gurpreet Garren, Hideki Chin, Peter Belachew, Shibeshih Kappos, Ludwig |
author_sort | Wolinsky, Jerry S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: No evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) is a novel combined endpoint defined by the absence of both progression and inflammatory disease activity in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). In the placebo‐controlled phase III ORATORIO study (NCT01194570), we investigated the effect of ocrelizumab on this comprehensive outcome and its components in a post‐hoc analysis. METHODS: The proportion of patients with NEPAD (no evidence of progression [NEP; no 12‐week confirmed progression of ≥1/≥0.5 points on the Expanded Disability Status Scale if the baseline score was ≤5.5/>5.5 points, respectively; no 12‐week confirmed progression of ≥20% on the Timed 25‐Foot Walk test and 9‐Hole Peg Test], no brain magnetic resonance imaging activity [no new/enlarging T2 lesions and no T1 gadolinium‐enhancing lesions], and no protocol‐defined relapse) from baseline to week 120 was determined in ocrelizumab‐ (600 mg; n = 465) and placebo‐treated (n = 234) patients. RESULTS: The majority of ORATORIO study patients with PPMS experienced clinical progression or evidence of disease activity. From baseline to week 120, 29.9% and 42.7% ocrelizumab‐treated compared to 9.4% and 29.1% placebo‐treated patients maintained NEPAD (relative risk [95% confidence interval {CI}], 3.15 [2.07–4.79]; p < 0.001) and NEP (relative risk [95% CI], 1.47 [1.17–1.84]; p < 0.001), respectively. Effects on the individual components of both measures were consistent with the compound outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Compared to placebo, ocrelizumab enhanced 3‐fold the proportion of PPMS patients with no evidence of either progression or inflammatory disease activity. NEPAD may represent a sensitive and meaningful comprehensive measure of disease control in patients with PPMS. Ann Neurol 2018;84:527–536 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6220799 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62207992018-11-13 Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial Wolinsky, Jerry S. Montalban, Xavier Hauser, Stephen L. Giovannoni, Gavin Vermersch, Patrick Bernasconi, Corrado Deol‐Bhullar, Gurpreet Garren, Hideki Chin, Peter Belachew, Shibeshih Kappos, Ludwig Ann Neurol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: No evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) is a novel combined endpoint defined by the absence of both progression and inflammatory disease activity in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). In the placebo‐controlled phase III ORATORIO study (NCT01194570), we investigated the effect of ocrelizumab on this comprehensive outcome and its components in a post‐hoc analysis. METHODS: The proportion of patients with NEPAD (no evidence of progression [NEP; no 12‐week confirmed progression of ≥1/≥0.5 points on the Expanded Disability Status Scale if the baseline score was ≤5.5/>5.5 points, respectively; no 12‐week confirmed progression of ≥20% on the Timed 25‐Foot Walk test and 9‐Hole Peg Test], no brain magnetic resonance imaging activity [no new/enlarging T2 lesions and no T1 gadolinium‐enhancing lesions], and no protocol‐defined relapse) from baseline to week 120 was determined in ocrelizumab‐ (600 mg; n = 465) and placebo‐treated (n = 234) patients. RESULTS: The majority of ORATORIO study patients with PPMS experienced clinical progression or evidence of disease activity. From baseline to week 120, 29.9% and 42.7% ocrelizumab‐treated compared to 9.4% and 29.1% placebo‐treated patients maintained NEPAD (relative risk [95% confidence interval {CI}], 3.15 [2.07–4.79]; p < 0.001) and NEP (relative risk [95% CI], 1.47 [1.17–1.84]; p < 0.001), respectively. Effects on the individual components of both measures were consistent with the compound outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Compared to placebo, ocrelizumab enhanced 3‐fold the proportion of PPMS patients with no evidence of either progression or inflammatory disease activity. NEPAD may represent a sensitive and meaningful comprehensive measure of disease control in patients with PPMS. Ann Neurol 2018;84:527–536 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-16 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6220799/ /pubmed/30155979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25313 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Neurological Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Wolinsky, Jerry S. Montalban, Xavier Hauser, Stephen L. Giovannoni, Gavin Vermersch, Patrick Bernasconi, Corrado Deol‐Bhullar, Gurpreet Garren, Hideki Chin, Peter Belachew, Shibeshih Kappos, Ludwig Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial |
title | Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial |
title_full | Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial |
title_short | Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial |
title_sort | evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (nepad) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the oratorio trial |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolinskyjerrys evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial AT montalbanxavier evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial AT hauserstephenl evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial AT giovannonigavin evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial AT vermerschpatrick evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial AT bernasconicorrado evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial AT deolbhullargurpreet evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial AT garrenhideki evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial AT chinpeter evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial AT belachewshibeshih evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial AT kapposludwig evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial |