Cargando…

Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial

OBJECTIVE: No evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) is a novel combined endpoint defined by the absence of both progression and inflammatory disease activity in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). In the placebo‐controlled phase III ORATORIO study (NCT01194570), we investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolinsky, Jerry S., Montalban, Xavier, Hauser, Stephen L., Giovannoni, Gavin, Vermersch, Patrick, Bernasconi, Corrado, Deol‐Bhullar, Gurpreet, Garren, Hideki, Chin, Peter, Belachew, Shibeshih, Kappos, Ludwig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25313
_version_ 1783368890599866368
author Wolinsky, Jerry S.
Montalban, Xavier
Hauser, Stephen L.
Giovannoni, Gavin
Vermersch, Patrick
Bernasconi, Corrado
Deol‐Bhullar, Gurpreet
Garren, Hideki
Chin, Peter
Belachew, Shibeshih
Kappos, Ludwig
author_facet Wolinsky, Jerry S.
Montalban, Xavier
Hauser, Stephen L.
Giovannoni, Gavin
Vermersch, Patrick
Bernasconi, Corrado
Deol‐Bhullar, Gurpreet
Garren, Hideki
Chin, Peter
Belachew, Shibeshih
Kappos, Ludwig
author_sort Wolinsky, Jerry S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: No evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) is a novel combined endpoint defined by the absence of both progression and inflammatory disease activity in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). In the placebo‐controlled phase III ORATORIO study (NCT01194570), we investigated the effect of ocrelizumab on this comprehensive outcome and its components in a post‐hoc analysis. METHODS: The proportion of patients with NEPAD (no evidence of progression [NEP; no 12‐week confirmed progression of ≥1/≥0.5 points on the Expanded Disability Status Scale if the baseline score was ≤5.5/>5.5 points, respectively; no 12‐week confirmed progression of ≥20% on the Timed 25‐Foot Walk test and 9‐Hole Peg Test], no brain magnetic resonance imaging activity [no new/enlarging T2 lesions and no T1 gadolinium‐enhancing lesions], and no protocol‐defined relapse) from baseline to week 120 was determined in ocrelizumab‐ (600 mg; n = 465) and placebo‐treated (n = 234) patients. RESULTS: The majority of ORATORIO study patients with PPMS experienced clinical progression or evidence of disease activity. From baseline to week 120, 29.9% and 42.7% ocrelizumab‐treated compared to 9.4% and 29.1% placebo‐treated patients maintained NEPAD (relative risk [95% confidence interval {CI}], 3.15 [2.07–4.79]; p < 0.001) and NEP (relative risk [95% CI], 1.47 [1.17–1.84]; p < 0.001), respectively. Effects on the individual components of both measures were consistent with the compound outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Compared to placebo, ocrelizumab enhanced 3‐fold the proportion of PPMS patients with no evidence of either progression or inflammatory disease activity. NEPAD may represent a sensitive and meaningful comprehensive measure of disease control in patients with PPMS. Ann Neurol 2018;84:527–536
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6220799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62207992018-11-13 Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial Wolinsky, Jerry S. Montalban, Xavier Hauser, Stephen L. Giovannoni, Gavin Vermersch, Patrick Bernasconi, Corrado Deol‐Bhullar, Gurpreet Garren, Hideki Chin, Peter Belachew, Shibeshih Kappos, Ludwig Ann Neurol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: No evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) is a novel combined endpoint defined by the absence of both progression and inflammatory disease activity in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). In the placebo‐controlled phase III ORATORIO study (NCT01194570), we investigated the effect of ocrelizumab on this comprehensive outcome and its components in a post‐hoc analysis. METHODS: The proportion of patients with NEPAD (no evidence of progression [NEP; no 12‐week confirmed progression of ≥1/≥0.5 points on the Expanded Disability Status Scale if the baseline score was ≤5.5/>5.5 points, respectively; no 12‐week confirmed progression of ≥20% on the Timed 25‐Foot Walk test and 9‐Hole Peg Test], no brain magnetic resonance imaging activity [no new/enlarging T2 lesions and no T1 gadolinium‐enhancing lesions], and no protocol‐defined relapse) from baseline to week 120 was determined in ocrelizumab‐ (600 mg; n = 465) and placebo‐treated (n = 234) patients. RESULTS: The majority of ORATORIO study patients with PPMS experienced clinical progression or evidence of disease activity. From baseline to week 120, 29.9% and 42.7% ocrelizumab‐treated compared to 9.4% and 29.1% placebo‐treated patients maintained NEPAD (relative risk [95% confidence interval {CI}], 3.15 [2.07–4.79]; p < 0.001) and NEP (relative risk [95% CI], 1.47 [1.17–1.84]; p < 0.001), respectively. Effects on the individual components of both measures were consistent with the compound outcomes. INTERPRETATION: Compared to placebo, ocrelizumab enhanced 3‐fold the proportion of PPMS patients with no evidence of either progression or inflammatory disease activity. NEPAD may represent a sensitive and meaningful comprehensive measure of disease control in patients with PPMS. Ann Neurol 2018;84:527–536 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-16 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6220799/ /pubmed/30155979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25313 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Neurological Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Wolinsky, Jerry S.
Montalban, Xavier
Hauser, Stephen L.
Giovannoni, Gavin
Vermersch, Patrick
Bernasconi, Corrado
Deol‐Bhullar, Gurpreet
Garren, Hideki
Chin, Peter
Belachew, Shibeshih
Kappos, Ludwig
Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial
title Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial
title_full Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial
title_short Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial
title_sort evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (nepad) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the oratorio trial
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6220799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30155979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.25313
work_keys_str_mv AT wolinskyjerrys evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial
AT montalbanxavier evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial
AT hauserstephenl evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial
AT giovannonigavin evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial
AT vermerschpatrick evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial
AT bernasconicorrado evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial
AT deolbhullargurpreet evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial
AT garrenhideki evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial
AT chinpeter evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial
AT belachewshibeshih evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial
AT kapposludwig evaluationofnoevidenceofprogressionoractivediseasenepadinpatientswithprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisintheoratoriotrial