Cargando…

Consensus molecular subtype classification of colorectal adenomas

Consensus molecular subtyping is an RNA expression‐based classification system for colorectal cancer (CRC). Genomic alterations accumulate during CRC pathogenesis, including the premalignant adenoma stage, leading to changes in RNA expression. Only a minority of adenomas progress to malignancies, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komor, Malgorzata A, Bosch, Linda JW, Bounova, Gergana, Bolijn, Anne S, Delis‐van Diemen, Pien M, Rausch, Christian, Hoogstrate, Youri, Stubbs, Andrew P, de Jong, Mark, Jenster, Guido, van Grieken, Nicole CT, Carvalho, Beatriz, Wessels, Lodewyk FA, Jimenez, Connie R, Fijneman, Remond JA, Meijer, Gerrit A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29968252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5129
_version_ 1783368935654031360
author Komor, Malgorzata A
Bosch, Linda JW
Bounova, Gergana
Bolijn, Anne S
Delis‐van Diemen, Pien M
Rausch, Christian
Hoogstrate, Youri
Stubbs, Andrew P
de Jong, Mark
Jenster, Guido
van Grieken, Nicole CT
Carvalho, Beatriz
Wessels, Lodewyk FA
Jimenez, Connie R
Fijneman, Remond JA
Meijer, Gerrit A
author_facet Komor, Malgorzata A
Bosch, Linda JW
Bounova, Gergana
Bolijn, Anne S
Delis‐van Diemen, Pien M
Rausch, Christian
Hoogstrate, Youri
Stubbs, Andrew P
de Jong, Mark
Jenster, Guido
van Grieken, Nicole CT
Carvalho, Beatriz
Wessels, Lodewyk FA
Jimenez, Connie R
Fijneman, Remond JA
Meijer, Gerrit A
author_sort Komor, Malgorzata A
collection PubMed
description Consensus molecular subtyping is an RNA expression‐based classification system for colorectal cancer (CRC). Genomic alterations accumulate during CRC pathogenesis, including the premalignant adenoma stage, leading to changes in RNA expression. Only a minority of adenomas progress to malignancies, a transition that is associated with specific DNA copy number aberrations or microsatellite instability (MSI). We aimed to investigate whether colorectal adenomas can already be stratified into consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classes, and whether specific CMS classes are related to the presence of specific DNA copy number aberrations associated with progression to malignancy. RNA sequencing was performed on 62 adenomas and 59 CRCs. MSI status was determined with polymerase chain reaction‐based methodology. DNA copy number was assessed by low‐coverage DNA sequencing (n = 30) or array‐comparative genomic hybridisation (n = 32). Adenomas were classified into CMS classes together with CRCs from the study cohort and from The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 556), by use of the established CMS classifier. As a result, 54 of 62 (87%) adenomas were classified according to the CMS. The CMS3 ‘metabolic subtype’, which was least common among CRCs, was most prevalent among adenomas (n = 45; 73%). One of the two adenomas showing MSI was classified as CMS1 (2%), the ‘MSI immune’ subtype. Eight adenomas (13%) were classified as the ‘canonical’ CMS2. No adenomas were classified as the ‘mesenchymal’ CMS4, consistent with the fact that adenomas lack invasion‐associated stroma. The distribution of the CMS classes among adenomas was confirmed in an independent series. CMS3 was enriched with adenomas at low risk of progressing to CRC, whereas relatively more high‐risk adenomas were observed in CMS2. We conclude that adenomas can be stratified into the CMS classes. Considering that CMS1 and CMS2 expression signatures may mark adenomas at increased risk of progression, the distribution of the CMS classes among adenomas is consistent with the proportion of adenomas expected to progress to CRC. © 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6221003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62210032018-11-15 Consensus molecular subtype classification of colorectal adenomas Komor, Malgorzata A Bosch, Linda JW Bounova, Gergana Bolijn, Anne S Delis‐van Diemen, Pien M Rausch, Christian Hoogstrate, Youri Stubbs, Andrew P de Jong, Mark Jenster, Guido van Grieken, Nicole CT Carvalho, Beatriz Wessels, Lodewyk FA Jimenez, Connie R Fijneman, Remond JA Meijer, Gerrit A J Pathol Original Papers Consensus molecular subtyping is an RNA expression‐based classification system for colorectal cancer (CRC). Genomic alterations accumulate during CRC pathogenesis, including the premalignant adenoma stage, leading to changes in RNA expression. Only a minority of adenomas progress to malignancies, a transition that is associated with specific DNA copy number aberrations or microsatellite instability (MSI). We aimed to investigate whether colorectal adenomas can already be stratified into consensus molecular subtype (CMS) classes, and whether specific CMS classes are related to the presence of specific DNA copy number aberrations associated with progression to malignancy. RNA sequencing was performed on 62 adenomas and 59 CRCs. MSI status was determined with polymerase chain reaction‐based methodology. DNA copy number was assessed by low‐coverage DNA sequencing (n = 30) or array‐comparative genomic hybridisation (n = 32). Adenomas were classified into CMS classes together with CRCs from the study cohort and from The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 556), by use of the established CMS classifier. As a result, 54 of 62 (87%) adenomas were classified according to the CMS. The CMS3 ‘metabolic subtype’, which was least common among CRCs, was most prevalent among adenomas (n = 45; 73%). One of the two adenomas showing MSI was classified as CMS1 (2%), the ‘MSI immune’ subtype. Eight adenomas (13%) were classified as the ‘canonical’ CMS2. No adenomas were classified as the ‘mesenchymal’ CMS4, consistent with the fact that adenomas lack invasion‐associated stroma. The distribution of the CMS classes among adenomas was confirmed in an independent series. CMS3 was enriched with adenomas at low risk of progressing to CRC, whereas relatively more high‐risk adenomas were observed in CMS2. We conclude that adenomas can be stratified into the CMS classes. Considering that CMS1 and CMS2 expression signatures may mark adenomas at increased risk of progression, the distribution of the CMS classes among adenomas is consistent with the proportion of adenomas expected to progress to CRC. © 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018-08-31 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6221003/ /pubmed/29968252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5129 Text en © 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Komor, Malgorzata A
Bosch, Linda JW
Bounova, Gergana
Bolijn, Anne S
Delis‐van Diemen, Pien M
Rausch, Christian
Hoogstrate, Youri
Stubbs, Andrew P
de Jong, Mark
Jenster, Guido
van Grieken, Nicole CT
Carvalho, Beatriz
Wessels, Lodewyk FA
Jimenez, Connie R
Fijneman, Remond JA
Meijer, Gerrit A
Consensus molecular subtype classification of colorectal adenomas
title Consensus molecular subtype classification of colorectal adenomas
title_full Consensus molecular subtype classification of colorectal adenomas
title_fullStr Consensus molecular subtype classification of colorectal adenomas
title_full_unstemmed Consensus molecular subtype classification of colorectal adenomas
title_short Consensus molecular subtype classification of colorectal adenomas
title_sort consensus molecular subtype classification of colorectal adenomas
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29968252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.5129
work_keys_str_mv AT komormalgorzataa consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT boschlindajw consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT bounovagergana consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT bolijnannes consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT delisvandiemenpienm consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT rauschchristian consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT hoogstrateyouri consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT stubbsandrewp consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT dejongmark consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT jensterguido consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT vangriekennicolect consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT carvalhobeatriz consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT wesselslodewykfa consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT jimenezconnier consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT fijnemanremondja consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT meijergerrita consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas
AT consensusmolecularsubtypeclassificationofcolorectaladenomas