Cargando…

Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients—The reliability of a pressure algometer

OBJECTIVES: A tool for measuring neck pain in patients with dizziness is needed to further investigate the relationship between the two symptoms. The objective of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of a hand‐held pressure algometer in measuring pressure pain threshold (PPT) in di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knapstad, Mari Kalland, Nordahl, Stein Helge Glad, Naterstad, Ingvill Fjell, Ask, Tove, Skouen, Jan Sture, Goplen, Frederik Kragerud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30088327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pri.1736
_version_ 1783368939029397504
author Knapstad, Mari Kalland
Nordahl, Stein Helge Glad
Naterstad, Ingvill Fjell
Ask, Tove
Skouen, Jan Sture
Goplen, Frederik Kragerud
author_facet Knapstad, Mari Kalland
Nordahl, Stein Helge Glad
Naterstad, Ingvill Fjell
Ask, Tove
Skouen, Jan Sture
Goplen, Frederik Kragerud
author_sort Knapstad, Mari Kalland
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: A tool for measuring neck pain in patients with dizziness is needed to further investigate the relationship between the two symptoms. The objective of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of a hand‐held pressure algometer in measuring pressure pain threshold (PPT) in different cervical regions of dizzy patients. METHODS: PPT was measured at two bilateral standardized sites of the neck by a trained physiotherapist in 50 patients with dizziness. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for intrarater and test–retest reliability. Concurrent validity was assessed by measuring the association between PPT and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) tender points at each site and with the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). RESULTS: Almost perfect intrarater (ICC = 0.815–0.940) and within‐session test–retest (ICC = 0.854–0.906) reliability was found between the measures. On each site, a low PPT predicted a positive ACR tender point at each site (OR = 0.864–0.922). Last, we found a statistical inverse relationship between the PPT and the NPRS (R = −0.52 to −0.66). CONCLUSION: The study shows that a pressure algometer is a reliable tool for measuring PPT in the neck of dizzy patients. Further, the PPT correlates significantly with other subjective measures of pain indicating that it may be a useful tool for further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6221019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62210192018-11-15 Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients—The reliability of a pressure algometer Knapstad, Mari Kalland Nordahl, Stein Helge Glad Naterstad, Ingvill Fjell Ask, Tove Skouen, Jan Sture Goplen, Frederik Kragerud Physiother Res Int Research Articles OBJECTIVES: A tool for measuring neck pain in patients with dizziness is needed to further investigate the relationship between the two symptoms. The objective of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of a hand‐held pressure algometer in measuring pressure pain threshold (PPT) in different cervical regions of dizzy patients. METHODS: PPT was measured at two bilateral standardized sites of the neck by a trained physiotherapist in 50 patients with dizziness. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for intrarater and test–retest reliability. Concurrent validity was assessed by measuring the association between PPT and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) tender points at each site and with the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). RESULTS: Almost perfect intrarater (ICC = 0.815–0.940) and within‐session test–retest (ICC = 0.854–0.906) reliability was found between the measures. On each site, a low PPT predicted a positive ACR tender point at each site (OR = 0.864–0.922). Last, we found a statistical inverse relationship between the PPT and the NPRS (R = −0.52 to −0.66). CONCLUSION: The study shows that a pressure algometer is a reliable tool for measuring PPT in the neck of dizzy patients. Further, the PPT correlates significantly with other subjective measures of pain indicating that it may be a useful tool for further research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-07 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6221019/ /pubmed/30088327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pri.1736 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Physiotherapy Research International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Knapstad, Mari Kalland
Nordahl, Stein Helge Glad
Naterstad, Ingvill Fjell
Ask, Tove
Skouen, Jan Sture
Goplen, Frederik Kragerud
Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients—The reliability of a pressure algometer
title Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients—The reliability of a pressure algometer
title_full Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients—The reliability of a pressure algometer
title_fullStr Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients—The reliability of a pressure algometer
title_full_unstemmed Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients—The reliability of a pressure algometer
title_short Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients—The reliability of a pressure algometer
title_sort measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients—the reliability of a pressure algometer
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30088327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pri.1736
work_keys_str_mv AT knapstadmarikalland measuringpressurepainthresholdinthecervicalregionofdizzypatientsthereliabilityofapressurealgometer
AT nordahlsteinhelgeglad measuringpressurepainthresholdinthecervicalregionofdizzypatientsthereliabilityofapressurealgometer
AT naterstadingvillfjell measuringpressurepainthresholdinthecervicalregionofdizzypatientsthereliabilityofapressurealgometer
AT asktove measuringpressurepainthresholdinthecervicalregionofdizzypatientsthereliabilityofapressurealgometer
AT skouenjansture measuringpressurepainthresholdinthecervicalregionofdizzypatientsthereliabilityofapressurealgometer
AT goplenfrederikkragerud measuringpressurepainthresholdinthecervicalregionofdizzypatientsthereliabilityofapressurealgometer