Cargando…

Comparison of three gamma oscillations in the mouse entorhinal–hippocampal system

The entorhinal–hippocampal system is an important circuit in the brain, essential for certain cognitive tasks such as memory and navigation. Different gamma oscillations occur in this circuit, with the medial entorhinal cortex (mEC), CA3 and CA1 all generating gamma oscillations with different prope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Butler, James L., Hay, Y. Audrey, Paulsen, Ole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29356162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13831
_version_ 1783368949048541184
author Butler, James L.
Hay, Y. Audrey
Paulsen, Ole
author_facet Butler, James L.
Hay, Y. Audrey
Paulsen, Ole
author_sort Butler, James L.
collection PubMed
description The entorhinal–hippocampal system is an important circuit in the brain, essential for certain cognitive tasks such as memory and navigation. Different gamma oscillations occur in this circuit, with the medial entorhinal cortex (mEC), CA3 and CA1 all generating gamma oscillations with different properties. These three gamma oscillations converge within CA1, where much work has gone into trying to isolate them from each other. Here, we compared the gamma generators in the mEC, CA3 and CA1 using optogenetically induced theta–gamma oscillations. Expressing channelrhodopsin‐2 in principal neurons in each of the three regions allowed for the induction of gamma oscillations via sinusoidal blue light stimulation at theta frequency. Recording the oscillations in CA1 in vivo, we found that CA3 stimulation induced slower gamma oscillations than CA1 stimulation, matching in vivo reports of spontaneous CA3 and CA1 gamma oscillations. In brain slices ex vivo, optogenetic stimulation of CA3 induced slower gamma oscillations than stimulation of either mEC or CA1, whose gamma oscillations were of similar frequency. All three gamma oscillations had a current sink–source pair between the perisomatic and dendritic layers of the same region. Taking advantage of this model to analyse gamma frequency mechanisms in slice, we showed using pharmacology that all three gamma oscillations were dependent on the same types of synaptic receptor, being abolished by blockade of either type A γ‐aminobutyric acid receptors or α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionic acid/kainate receptors, and insensitive to blockade of N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptors. These results indicate that a fast excitatory–inhibitory feedback loop underlies the generation of gamma oscillations in all three regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6221063
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62210632018-11-15 Comparison of three gamma oscillations in the mouse entorhinal–hippocampal system Butler, James L. Hay, Y. Audrey Paulsen, Ole Eur J Neurosci Neural Oscillations The entorhinal–hippocampal system is an important circuit in the brain, essential for certain cognitive tasks such as memory and navigation. Different gamma oscillations occur in this circuit, with the medial entorhinal cortex (mEC), CA3 and CA1 all generating gamma oscillations with different properties. These three gamma oscillations converge within CA1, where much work has gone into trying to isolate them from each other. Here, we compared the gamma generators in the mEC, CA3 and CA1 using optogenetically induced theta–gamma oscillations. Expressing channelrhodopsin‐2 in principal neurons in each of the three regions allowed for the induction of gamma oscillations via sinusoidal blue light stimulation at theta frequency. Recording the oscillations in CA1 in vivo, we found that CA3 stimulation induced slower gamma oscillations than CA1 stimulation, matching in vivo reports of spontaneous CA3 and CA1 gamma oscillations. In brain slices ex vivo, optogenetic stimulation of CA3 induced slower gamma oscillations than stimulation of either mEC or CA1, whose gamma oscillations were of similar frequency. All three gamma oscillations had a current sink–source pair between the perisomatic and dendritic layers of the same region. Taking advantage of this model to analyse gamma frequency mechanisms in slice, we showed using pharmacology that all three gamma oscillations were dependent on the same types of synaptic receptor, being abolished by blockade of either type A γ‐aminobutyric acid receptors or α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionic acid/kainate receptors, and insensitive to blockade of N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptors. These results indicate that a fast excitatory–inhibitory feedback loop underlies the generation of gamma oscillations in all three regions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-09 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6221063/ /pubmed/29356162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13831 Text en © 2018 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Neural Oscillations
Butler, James L.
Hay, Y. Audrey
Paulsen, Ole
Comparison of three gamma oscillations in the mouse entorhinal–hippocampal system
title Comparison of three gamma oscillations in the mouse entorhinal–hippocampal system
title_full Comparison of three gamma oscillations in the mouse entorhinal–hippocampal system
title_fullStr Comparison of three gamma oscillations in the mouse entorhinal–hippocampal system
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three gamma oscillations in the mouse entorhinal–hippocampal system
title_short Comparison of three gamma oscillations in the mouse entorhinal–hippocampal system
title_sort comparison of three gamma oscillations in the mouse entorhinal–hippocampal system
topic Neural Oscillations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221063/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29356162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13831
work_keys_str_mv AT butlerjamesl comparisonofthreegammaoscillationsinthemouseentorhinalhippocampalsystem
AT hayyaudrey comparisonofthreegammaoscillationsinthemouseentorhinalhippocampalsystem
AT paulsenole comparisonofthreegammaoscillationsinthemouseentorhinalhippocampalsystem