Cargando…

Long‐term outcome of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the long‐term effect and treatment stability of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated with highly selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Veen, Martinus M., Dusseldorp, Joseph R., Hadlock, Tessa A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29668050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27225
_version_ 1783368953654935552
author van Veen, Martinus M.
Dusseldorp, Joseph R.
Hadlock, Tessa A.
author_facet van Veen, Martinus M.
Dusseldorp, Joseph R.
Hadlock, Tessa A.
author_sort van Veen, Martinus M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the long‐term effect and treatment stability of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated with highly selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis between August 2009 and August 2015. Primary outcome was time to recommencing treatment for periocular synkinesis. Palpebral fissure width was measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at long‐term ( > 2.5 years) follow‐up. Mean units of botulinum toxin used pre‐ and postoperatively were compared. RESULTS: Of the 12 patients, 10 could be included. Only one was free of treatment for periocular synkinesis at a follow‐up of 3.5 years. The other nine patients recommenced treatment with botulinum toxin after a median time of 1.2 (interquartile range 0.6–2.6) years. Palpebral fissure width while smiling was significantly different between the pre‐ and postoperative (P = 0.008) and preoperative and long‐term (P = 0.008) measurements. Postoperatively, previously refractory patients demonstrated good response to botulinum toxin treatments. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that most patients require renewed pharmacological treatment of periocular synkinesis after neurectomy. Although the effect of neurectomy in the treatment of refractory synkinesis does not appear to be sustained, patients usually experience a symptom‐free interval and demonstrate larger palpebral fissure width at long‐term follow‐up compared to preoperative measurements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:2291–2295, 2018
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6221084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62210842018-11-15 Long‐term outcome of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis van Veen, Martinus M. Dusseldorp, Joseph R. Hadlock, Tessa A. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Facial Plastics/Reconstructive Surgery OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the long‐term effect and treatment stability of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients treated with highly selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis between August 2009 and August 2015. Primary outcome was time to recommencing treatment for periocular synkinesis. Palpebral fissure width was measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at long‐term ( > 2.5 years) follow‐up. Mean units of botulinum toxin used pre‐ and postoperatively were compared. RESULTS: Of the 12 patients, 10 could be included. Only one was free of treatment for periocular synkinesis at a follow‐up of 3.5 years. The other nine patients recommenced treatment with botulinum toxin after a median time of 1.2 (interquartile range 0.6–2.6) years. Palpebral fissure width while smiling was significantly different between the pre‐ and postoperative (P = 0.008) and preoperative and long‐term (P = 0.008) measurements. Postoperatively, previously refractory patients demonstrated good response to botulinum toxin treatments. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that most patients require renewed pharmacological treatment of periocular synkinesis after neurectomy. Although the effect of neurectomy in the treatment of refractory synkinesis does not appear to be sustained, patients usually experience a symptom‐free interval and demonstrate larger palpebral fissure width at long‐term follow‐up compared to preoperative measurements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:2291–2295, 2018 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-18 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6221084/ /pubmed/29668050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27225 Text en © 2018 The Authors The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society Inc, “The Triological Society” and American Laryngological Association (ALA) This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Facial Plastics/Reconstructive Surgery
van Veen, Martinus M.
Dusseldorp, Joseph R.
Hadlock, Tessa A.
Long‐term outcome of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis
title Long‐term outcome of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis
title_full Long‐term outcome of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis
title_fullStr Long‐term outcome of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis
title_full_unstemmed Long‐term outcome of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis
title_short Long‐term outcome of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis
title_sort long‐term outcome of selective neurectomy for refractory periocular synkinesis
topic Facial Plastics/Reconstructive Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29668050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.27225
work_keys_str_mv AT vanveenmartinusm longtermoutcomeofselectiveneurectomyforrefractoryperiocularsynkinesis
AT dusseldorpjosephr longtermoutcomeofselectiveneurectomyforrefractoryperiocularsynkinesis
AT hadlocktessaa longtermoutcomeofselectiveneurectomyforrefractoryperiocularsynkinesis