Cargando…

A robust deconvolution method to disentangle multiple water pools in diffusion MRI

The diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) signal measured in vivo arises from multiple diffusion domains, including hindered and restricted water pools, free water and blood pseudo‐diffusion. Not accounting for the correct number of components can bias metrics obtained from model fitt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Luca, Alberto, Leemans, Alexander, Bertoldo, Alessandra, Arrigoni, Filippo, Froeling, Martijn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30052293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3965
_version_ 1783368958942904320
author De Luca, Alberto
Leemans, Alexander
Bertoldo, Alessandra
Arrigoni, Filippo
Froeling, Martijn
author_facet De Luca, Alberto
Leemans, Alexander
Bertoldo, Alessandra
Arrigoni, Filippo
Froeling, Martijn
author_sort De Luca, Alberto
collection PubMed
description The diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) signal measured in vivo arises from multiple diffusion domains, including hindered and restricted water pools, free water and blood pseudo‐diffusion. Not accounting for the correct number of components can bias metrics obtained from model fitting because of partial volume effects that are present in, for instance, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI). Approaches that aim to overcome this shortcoming generally make assumptions about the number of considered components, which are not likely to hold for all voxels. The spectral analysis of the dMRI signal has been proposed to relax assumptions on the number of components. However, it currently requires a clinically challenging signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and accounts only for two diffusion processes defined by hard thresholds. In this work, we developed a method to automatically identify the number of components in the spectral analysis, and enforced its robustness to noise, including outlier rejection and a data‐driven regularization term. Furthermore, we showed how this method can be used to take into account partial volume effects in DTI and DKI fitting. The proof of concept and performance of the method were evaluated through numerical simulations and in vivo MRI data acquired at 3 T. With simulations our method reliably decomposed three diffusion components from SNR = 30. Biases in metrics derived from DTI and DKI were considerably reduced when components beyond hindered diffusion were taken into account. With the in vivo data our method determined three macro‐compartments, which were consistent with hindered diffusion, free water and pseudo‐diffusion. Taking free water and pseudo‐diffusion into account in DKI resulted in lower mean diffusivity and higher fractional anisotropy values in both gray and white matter. In conclusion, the proposed method allows one to determine co‐existing diffusion compartments without prior assumptions on their number, and to account for undesired signal contaminations within clinically achievable SNR levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6221109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62211092018-11-15 A robust deconvolution method to disentangle multiple water pools in diffusion MRI De Luca, Alberto Leemans, Alexander Bertoldo, Alessandra Arrigoni, Filippo Froeling, Martijn NMR Biomed Research Articles The diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) signal measured in vivo arises from multiple diffusion domains, including hindered and restricted water pools, free water and blood pseudo‐diffusion. Not accounting for the correct number of components can bias metrics obtained from model fitting because of partial volume effects that are present in, for instance, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI). Approaches that aim to overcome this shortcoming generally make assumptions about the number of considered components, which are not likely to hold for all voxels. The spectral analysis of the dMRI signal has been proposed to relax assumptions on the number of components. However, it currently requires a clinically challenging signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and accounts only for two diffusion processes defined by hard thresholds. In this work, we developed a method to automatically identify the number of components in the spectral analysis, and enforced its robustness to noise, including outlier rejection and a data‐driven regularization term. Furthermore, we showed how this method can be used to take into account partial volume effects in DTI and DKI fitting. The proof of concept and performance of the method were evaluated through numerical simulations and in vivo MRI data acquired at 3 T. With simulations our method reliably decomposed three diffusion components from SNR = 30. Biases in metrics derived from DTI and DKI were considerably reduced when components beyond hindered diffusion were taken into account. With the in vivo data our method determined three macro‐compartments, which were consistent with hindered diffusion, free water and pseudo‐diffusion. Taking free water and pseudo‐diffusion into account in DKI resulted in lower mean diffusivity and higher fractional anisotropy values in both gray and white matter. In conclusion, the proposed method allows one to determine co‐existing diffusion compartments without prior assumptions on their number, and to account for undesired signal contaminations within clinically achievable SNR levels. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-27 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6221109/ /pubmed/30052293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3965 Text en © 2018 The Authors. NMR in Biomedicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
De Luca, Alberto
Leemans, Alexander
Bertoldo, Alessandra
Arrigoni, Filippo
Froeling, Martijn
A robust deconvolution method to disentangle multiple water pools in diffusion MRI
title A robust deconvolution method to disentangle multiple water pools in diffusion MRI
title_full A robust deconvolution method to disentangle multiple water pools in diffusion MRI
title_fullStr A robust deconvolution method to disentangle multiple water pools in diffusion MRI
title_full_unstemmed A robust deconvolution method to disentangle multiple water pools in diffusion MRI
title_short A robust deconvolution method to disentangle multiple water pools in diffusion MRI
title_sort robust deconvolution method to disentangle multiple water pools in diffusion mri
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30052293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3965
work_keys_str_mv AT delucaalberto arobustdeconvolutionmethodtodisentanglemultiplewaterpoolsindiffusionmri
AT leemansalexander arobustdeconvolutionmethodtodisentanglemultiplewaterpoolsindiffusionmri
AT bertoldoalessandra arobustdeconvolutionmethodtodisentanglemultiplewaterpoolsindiffusionmri
AT arrigonifilippo arobustdeconvolutionmethodtodisentanglemultiplewaterpoolsindiffusionmri
AT froelingmartijn arobustdeconvolutionmethodtodisentanglemultiplewaterpoolsindiffusionmri
AT delucaalberto robustdeconvolutionmethodtodisentanglemultiplewaterpoolsindiffusionmri
AT leemansalexander robustdeconvolutionmethodtodisentanglemultiplewaterpoolsindiffusionmri
AT bertoldoalessandra robustdeconvolutionmethodtodisentanglemultiplewaterpoolsindiffusionmri
AT arrigonifilippo robustdeconvolutionmethodtodisentanglemultiplewaterpoolsindiffusionmri
AT froelingmartijn robustdeconvolutionmethodtodisentanglemultiplewaterpoolsindiffusionmri