Cargando…

Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND: In‐transit and recurrent dermal or subcutaneous melanoma metastases represent a significant burden of advanced disease. Intralesional Rose Bengal can elicit tumor selective ablation and a T‐cell mediated abscopal effect in untreated lesions. A subset of patients in a phase II trial setti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foote, Matthew, Read, Tavis, Thomas, Janine, Wagels, Michael, Burmeister, Bryan, Smithers, B. Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28230241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.24580
_version_ 1783368964295884800
author Foote, Matthew
Read, Tavis
Thomas, Janine
Wagels, Michael
Burmeister, Bryan
Smithers, B. Mark
author_facet Foote, Matthew
Read, Tavis
Thomas, Janine
Wagels, Michael
Burmeister, Bryan
Smithers, B. Mark
author_sort Foote, Matthew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In‐transit and recurrent dermal or subcutaneous melanoma metastases represent a significant burden of advanced disease. Intralesional Rose Bengal can elicit tumor selective ablation and a T‐cell mediated abscopal effect in untreated lesions. A subset of patients in a phase II trial setting received external beam radiotherapy to their recurrent lesions with complete or partial response and no significant acute radiation reaction. METHODS: An open‐label, single‐arm phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of PV‐10 followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy. Patients had in‐transit melanoma metastases suitable for IL therapy and radiotherapy. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled and thirteen completed both treatment components. The overall response rate was 86.6% and the clinical benefit was 93.3% on an intention to treat analysis (CR 33.3%, PR 53.3%, SD 6.7%). The median follow up duration was 19.25 months. Size of metastases (<10 mm) predicted lesion complete response (74.6%). Treatment was well tolerated with no associated grade 4 or 5 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PV‐10 and radiotherapy resulted in lesion‐specific, normal tissue‐sparing, ablation of disease with minimal local or systemic adverse effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6221132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62211322018-11-15 Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma Foote, Matthew Read, Tavis Thomas, Janine Wagels, Michael Burmeister, Bryan Smithers, B. Mark J Surg Oncol Research Articles BACKGROUND: In‐transit and recurrent dermal or subcutaneous melanoma metastases represent a significant burden of advanced disease. Intralesional Rose Bengal can elicit tumor selective ablation and a T‐cell mediated abscopal effect in untreated lesions. A subset of patients in a phase II trial setting received external beam radiotherapy to their recurrent lesions with complete or partial response and no significant acute radiation reaction. METHODS: An open‐label, single‐arm phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of PV‐10 followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy. Patients had in‐transit melanoma metastases suitable for IL therapy and radiotherapy. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled and thirteen completed both treatment components. The overall response rate was 86.6% and the clinical benefit was 93.3% on an intention to treat analysis (CR 33.3%, PR 53.3%, SD 6.7%). The median follow up duration was 19.25 months. Size of metastases (<10 mm) predicted lesion complete response (74.6%). Treatment was well tolerated with no associated grade 4 or 5 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PV‐10 and radiotherapy resulted in lesion‐specific, normal tissue‐sparing, ablation of disease with minimal local or systemic adverse effects. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-23 2017-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6221132/ /pubmed/28230241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.24580 Text en © 2017 The Authors Journal of Surgical Oncology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an Open Access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Foote, Matthew
Read, Tavis
Thomas, Janine
Wagels, Michael
Burmeister, Bryan
Smithers, B. Mark
Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma
title Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma
title_full Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma
title_fullStr Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma
title_short Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma
title_sort results of a phase ii, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional pv‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28230241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.24580
work_keys_str_mv AT footematthew resultsofaphaseiiopenlabelnoncomparativestudyofintralesionalpv10followedbyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofintransitormetastaticmelanoma
AT readtavis resultsofaphaseiiopenlabelnoncomparativestudyofintralesionalpv10followedbyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofintransitormetastaticmelanoma
AT thomasjanine resultsofaphaseiiopenlabelnoncomparativestudyofintralesionalpv10followedbyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofintransitormetastaticmelanoma
AT wagelsmichael resultsofaphaseiiopenlabelnoncomparativestudyofintralesionalpv10followedbyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofintransitormetastaticmelanoma
AT burmeisterbryan resultsofaphaseiiopenlabelnoncomparativestudyofintralesionalpv10followedbyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofintransitormetastaticmelanoma
AT smithersbmark resultsofaphaseiiopenlabelnoncomparativestudyofintralesionalpv10followedbyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofintransitormetastaticmelanoma