Cargando…
Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma
BACKGROUND: In‐transit and recurrent dermal or subcutaneous melanoma metastases represent a significant burden of advanced disease. Intralesional Rose Bengal can elicit tumor selective ablation and a T‐cell mediated abscopal effect in untreated lesions. A subset of patients in a phase II trial setti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28230241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.24580 |
_version_ | 1783368964295884800 |
---|---|
author | Foote, Matthew Read, Tavis Thomas, Janine Wagels, Michael Burmeister, Bryan Smithers, B. Mark |
author_facet | Foote, Matthew Read, Tavis Thomas, Janine Wagels, Michael Burmeister, Bryan Smithers, B. Mark |
author_sort | Foote, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In‐transit and recurrent dermal or subcutaneous melanoma metastases represent a significant burden of advanced disease. Intralesional Rose Bengal can elicit tumor selective ablation and a T‐cell mediated abscopal effect in untreated lesions. A subset of patients in a phase II trial setting received external beam radiotherapy to their recurrent lesions with complete or partial response and no significant acute radiation reaction. METHODS: An open‐label, single‐arm phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of PV‐10 followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy. Patients had in‐transit melanoma metastases suitable for IL therapy and radiotherapy. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled and thirteen completed both treatment components. The overall response rate was 86.6% and the clinical benefit was 93.3% on an intention to treat analysis (CR 33.3%, PR 53.3%, SD 6.7%). The median follow up duration was 19.25 months. Size of metastases (<10 mm) predicted lesion complete response (74.6%). Treatment was well tolerated with no associated grade 4 or 5 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PV‐10 and radiotherapy resulted in lesion‐specific, normal tissue‐sparing, ablation of disease with minimal local or systemic adverse effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6221132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62211322018-11-15 Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma Foote, Matthew Read, Tavis Thomas, Janine Wagels, Michael Burmeister, Bryan Smithers, B. Mark J Surg Oncol Research Articles BACKGROUND: In‐transit and recurrent dermal or subcutaneous melanoma metastases represent a significant burden of advanced disease. Intralesional Rose Bengal can elicit tumor selective ablation and a T‐cell mediated abscopal effect in untreated lesions. A subset of patients in a phase II trial setting received external beam radiotherapy to their recurrent lesions with complete or partial response and no significant acute radiation reaction. METHODS: An open‐label, single‐arm phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of PV‐10 followed by hypofractionated radiotherapy. Patients had in‐transit melanoma metastases suitable for IL therapy and radiotherapy. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled and thirteen completed both treatment components. The overall response rate was 86.6% and the clinical benefit was 93.3% on an intention to treat analysis (CR 33.3%, PR 53.3%, SD 6.7%). The median follow up duration was 19.25 months. Size of metastases (<10 mm) predicted lesion complete response (74.6%). Treatment was well tolerated with no associated grade 4 or 5 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PV‐10 and radiotherapy resulted in lesion‐specific, normal tissue‐sparing, ablation of disease with minimal local or systemic adverse effects. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-23 2017-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6221132/ /pubmed/28230241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.24580 Text en © 2017 The Authors Journal of Surgical Oncology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an Open Access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Foote, Matthew Read, Tavis Thomas, Janine Wagels, Michael Burmeister, Bryan Smithers, B. Mark Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma |
title | Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma |
title_full | Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma |
title_fullStr | Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma |
title_short | Results of a phase II, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional PV‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma |
title_sort | results of a phase ii, open‐label, non‐comparative study of intralesional pv‐10 followed by radiotherapy for the treatment of in‐transit or metastatic melanoma |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28230241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.24580 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT footematthew resultsofaphaseiiopenlabelnoncomparativestudyofintralesionalpv10followedbyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofintransitormetastaticmelanoma AT readtavis resultsofaphaseiiopenlabelnoncomparativestudyofintralesionalpv10followedbyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofintransitormetastaticmelanoma AT thomasjanine resultsofaphaseiiopenlabelnoncomparativestudyofintralesionalpv10followedbyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofintransitormetastaticmelanoma AT wagelsmichael resultsofaphaseiiopenlabelnoncomparativestudyofintralesionalpv10followedbyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofintransitormetastaticmelanoma AT burmeisterbryan resultsofaphaseiiopenlabelnoncomparativestudyofintralesionalpv10followedbyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofintransitormetastaticmelanoma AT smithersbmark resultsofaphaseiiopenlabelnoncomparativestudyofintralesionalpv10followedbyradiotherapyforthetreatmentofintransitormetastaticmelanoma |