Cargando…

Age differences in the prosocial influence effect

Social influence occurs when an individual's thoughts or behaviours are affected by other people. There are significant age effects on susceptibility to social influence, typically a decline from childhood to adulthood. Most research has focused on negative aspects of social influence, such as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foulkes, Lucy, Leung, Jovita T, Fuhrmann, Delia, Knoll, Lisa J, Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29658168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/desc.12666
_version_ 1783368968236433408
author Foulkes, Lucy
Leung, Jovita T
Fuhrmann, Delia
Knoll, Lisa J
Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne
author_facet Foulkes, Lucy
Leung, Jovita T
Fuhrmann, Delia
Knoll, Lisa J
Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne
author_sort Foulkes, Lucy
collection PubMed
description Social influence occurs when an individual's thoughts or behaviours are affected by other people. There are significant age effects on susceptibility to social influence, typically a decline from childhood to adulthood. Most research has focused on negative aspects of social influence, such as peer influence on risky behaviour, particularly in adolescence. The current study investigated the impact of social influence on the reporting of prosocial behaviour (any act intended to help another person). In this study, 755 participants aged 8–59 completed a computerized task in which they rated how likely they would be to engage in a prosocial behaviour. Afterwards, they were told the average rating (in fact fictitious) that other participants had given to the same question, and then were asked to rate the same behaviour again. We found that participants' age affected the extent to which they were influenced by other people: children (8–11 years), young adolescents (12–14 years) and mid‐adolescents (15–18 years) all significantly changed their ratings, while young adults (19–25 years) and adults (26–59 years) did not. Across the three youngest age groups, children showed the most susceptibility to prosocial influence, changing their reporting of prosocial behaviour the most. The study provides evidence that younger people's increased susceptibility to social influence can have positive outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6221149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62211492018-11-15 Age differences in the prosocial influence effect Foulkes, Lucy Leung, Jovita T Fuhrmann, Delia Knoll, Lisa J Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne Dev Sci Papers Social influence occurs when an individual's thoughts or behaviours are affected by other people. There are significant age effects on susceptibility to social influence, typically a decline from childhood to adulthood. Most research has focused on negative aspects of social influence, such as peer influence on risky behaviour, particularly in adolescence. The current study investigated the impact of social influence on the reporting of prosocial behaviour (any act intended to help another person). In this study, 755 participants aged 8–59 completed a computerized task in which they rated how likely they would be to engage in a prosocial behaviour. Afterwards, they were told the average rating (in fact fictitious) that other participants had given to the same question, and then were asked to rate the same behaviour again. We found that participants' age affected the extent to which they were influenced by other people: children (8–11 years), young adolescents (12–14 years) and mid‐adolescents (15–18 years) all significantly changed their ratings, while young adults (19–25 years) and adults (26–59 years) did not. Across the three youngest age groups, children showed the most susceptibility to prosocial influence, changing their reporting of prosocial behaviour the most. The study provides evidence that younger people's increased susceptibility to social influence can have positive outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-15 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6221149/ /pubmed/29658168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/desc.12666 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Developmental Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Papers
Foulkes, Lucy
Leung, Jovita T
Fuhrmann, Delia
Knoll, Lisa J
Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne
Age differences in the prosocial influence effect
title Age differences in the prosocial influence effect
title_full Age differences in the prosocial influence effect
title_fullStr Age differences in the prosocial influence effect
title_full_unstemmed Age differences in the prosocial influence effect
title_short Age differences in the prosocial influence effect
title_sort age differences in the prosocial influence effect
topic Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29658168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/desc.12666
work_keys_str_mv AT foulkeslucy agedifferencesintheprosocialinfluenceeffect
AT leungjovitat agedifferencesintheprosocialinfluenceeffect
AT fuhrmanndelia agedifferencesintheprosocialinfluenceeffect
AT knolllisaj agedifferencesintheprosocialinfluenceeffect
AT blakemoresarahjayne agedifferencesintheprosocialinfluenceeffect