Cargando…
Age differences in the prosocial influence effect
Social influence occurs when an individual's thoughts or behaviours are affected by other people. There are significant age effects on susceptibility to social influence, typically a decline from childhood to adulthood. Most research has focused on negative aspects of social influence, such as...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29658168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/desc.12666 |
_version_ | 1783368968236433408 |
---|---|
author | Foulkes, Lucy Leung, Jovita T Fuhrmann, Delia Knoll, Lisa J Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne |
author_facet | Foulkes, Lucy Leung, Jovita T Fuhrmann, Delia Knoll, Lisa J Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne |
author_sort | Foulkes, Lucy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Social influence occurs when an individual's thoughts or behaviours are affected by other people. There are significant age effects on susceptibility to social influence, typically a decline from childhood to adulthood. Most research has focused on negative aspects of social influence, such as peer influence on risky behaviour, particularly in adolescence. The current study investigated the impact of social influence on the reporting of prosocial behaviour (any act intended to help another person). In this study, 755 participants aged 8–59 completed a computerized task in which they rated how likely they would be to engage in a prosocial behaviour. Afterwards, they were told the average rating (in fact fictitious) that other participants had given to the same question, and then were asked to rate the same behaviour again. We found that participants' age affected the extent to which they were influenced by other people: children (8–11 years), young adolescents (12–14 years) and mid‐adolescents (15–18 years) all significantly changed their ratings, while young adults (19–25 years) and adults (26–59 years) did not. Across the three youngest age groups, children showed the most susceptibility to prosocial influence, changing their reporting of prosocial behaviour the most. The study provides evidence that younger people's increased susceptibility to social influence can have positive outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6221149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62211492018-11-15 Age differences in the prosocial influence effect Foulkes, Lucy Leung, Jovita T Fuhrmann, Delia Knoll, Lisa J Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne Dev Sci Papers Social influence occurs when an individual's thoughts or behaviours are affected by other people. There are significant age effects on susceptibility to social influence, typically a decline from childhood to adulthood. Most research has focused on negative aspects of social influence, such as peer influence on risky behaviour, particularly in adolescence. The current study investigated the impact of social influence on the reporting of prosocial behaviour (any act intended to help another person). In this study, 755 participants aged 8–59 completed a computerized task in which they rated how likely they would be to engage in a prosocial behaviour. Afterwards, they were told the average rating (in fact fictitious) that other participants had given to the same question, and then were asked to rate the same behaviour again. We found that participants' age affected the extent to which they were influenced by other people: children (8–11 years), young adolescents (12–14 years) and mid‐adolescents (15–18 years) all significantly changed their ratings, while young adults (19–25 years) and adults (26–59 years) did not. Across the three youngest age groups, children showed the most susceptibility to prosocial influence, changing their reporting of prosocial behaviour the most. The study provides evidence that younger people's increased susceptibility to social influence can have positive outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-15 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6221149/ /pubmed/29658168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/desc.12666 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Developmental Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Papers Foulkes, Lucy Leung, Jovita T Fuhrmann, Delia Knoll, Lisa J Blakemore, Sarah‐Jayne Age differences in the prosocial influence effect |
title | Age differences in the prosocial influence effect |
title_full | Age differences in the prosocial influence effect |
title_fullStr | Age differences in the prosocial influence effect |
title_full_unstemmed | Age differences in the prosocial influence effect |
title_short | Age differences in the prosocial influence effect |
title_sort | age differences in the prosocial influence effect |
topic | Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29658168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/desc.12666 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foulkeslucy agedifferencesintheprosocialinfluenceeffect AT leungjovitat agedifferencesintheprosocialinfluenceeffect AT fuhrmanndelia agedifferencesintheprosocialinfluenceeffect AT knolllisaj agedifferencesintheprosocialinfluenceeffect AT blakemoresarahjayne agedifferencesintheprosocialinfluenceeffect |