Cargando…

Comparison of clinical symptoms, gastric motility and fat intake in the early chronic pancreatitis patients with anti-acid therapy-resistant functional dyspepsia patients

BACKGROUND: There was no available data concerning the clinical differentiation between the updated definition of early chronic pancreatitis (ECP) and anti-acid therapy-resistant functional dyspepsia (RFD). AIMS: We aimed to determine whether clinical symptoms, gastric motility, psychogenic factors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wakabayashi, Mako, Futagami, Seiji, Yamawaki, Hiroshi, Tatsuguchi, Atsushi, Kaneko, Keiko, Agawa, Shuhei, Higuchi, Kazutoshi, Sakasegawa, Noriko, Murakami, Makoto, Akimoto, Teppei, Kodaka, Yasuhiro, Ueki, Nobue, Gudis, Kaya, Kawamoto, Chiaki, Akamizu, Takashi, Sakamoto, Choitsu, Iwakiri, Katsuhiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30403664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205165
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There was no available data concerning the clinical differentiation between the updated definition of early chronic pancreatitis (ECP) and anti-acid therapy-resistant functional dyspepsia (RFD). AIMS: We aimed to determine whether clinical symptoms, gastric motility, psychogenic factors and fat intake can help distinguish early chronic pancreatitis (ECP) from anti-acid therapy-resistant functional dyspepsia patients with pancreatic enzyme abnormalities (RFD-P) and anti-acid therapy-resistant functional dyspepsia (RFD) patients using endosonography. METHODS: We enrolled 102 consecutive patients presenting with typical symptoms of RFD patients (n = 52), ECP patients (n = 25) and RFD-P patients (n = 25). ECP patients were diagnosed based on the criteria recommended by the Japan Pancreatic Association. Gastric motility was evaluated by (13)C-acetate breath tests. Severity of duodenal inflammation was examined. RESULTS: 24.5% of RFD patients were determined as ECP using endosonography. Abdominal pain score in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) in the patients with ECP was significantly lower compared to that in the patients with RFD-P. There were no significant differences in State-Trait Inventory (STAI)-state/-trait scores, Self-Rating Questionnaire for Depression (SRQ-D) scores and clinical symptoms for fat intake among three groups. The early phase of gastric emptying (AUC(5); AUC(15)) in ECP and RFD-P patients were significantly disturbed compared to those in RFD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of severity of abdominal pain and measurement of the early phase of gastric emptying will be useful tools to distinguish ECP patients from RFD patients. Accurate diagnosis of ECP patients may contribute to the prevention from advancing of chronic pancreatitis.