Cargando…

Elderly patients’ (≥65 years) experiences associated with discharge; Development, validity and reliability of the Discharge Care Experiences Survey

BACKGROUND: A review of the literature reveals a lack of validated instruments that particularly measure quality in the hospital discharge process. This study aims to develop and validate a survey instrument feasible for measuring quality (≥65 years) related to the discharge process based on elderly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boge, Ranveig Marie, Haugen, Arvid Steinar, Nilsen, Roy Miodini, Harthug, Stig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30403738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206904
_version_ 1783368997456052224
author Boge, Ranveig Marie
Haugen, Arvid Steinar
Nilsen, Roy Miodini
Harthug, Stig
author_facet Boge, Ranveig Marie
Haugen, Arvid Steinar
Nilsen, Roy Miodini
Harthug, Stig
author_sort Boge, Ranveig Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A review of the literature reveals a lack of validated instruments that particularly measure quality in the hospital discharge process. This study aims to develop and validate a survey instrument feasible for measuring quality (≥65 years) related to the discharge process based on elderly patients’ experiences. METHODS: Construction of the Discharge Care Patient Experience Survey (DICARES) was based on 16 items identified by literature reviews. Intraclass correlation for test–retest was applied to assess consistency of the survey. Explorative factors analysis was applied to identify and validate the factor structures of the DICARES. Cronbach’s α was used to assess internal reliability. To evaluate the external validity of the final DICARES questionnaire the patients’ scores were correlated with scores obtained from the three other questionnaires; the Nordic Patient Experiences Questionnaire, the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey and Subjective Health Complaints. The DICARES association with readmissions was examined. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients responded (64.4%). The mean age of participants was 77.1 years and 57.8% were men. The exploratory factor analysis resulted in a 10-item instrument consisting of three factors explaining 63.5% of the total variance. The Cronbach’s α were satisfactory (≥70). Overall intraclass correlation was 0.76. A moderate Spearman correlation (rho = 0.54, p <0.01) was found between the total mean DICARES score and total mean score of the Nordic Patient Experiences Questionnaire. The total mean DICARES score was inversely associated with the quality indicator based on readmissions (OR 0.62, CI 95: 0.41–0.95, p = 0.028) CONCLUSION: We have developed a 10-item questionnaire consisting of three factors which may be a feasible instrument for measuring quality of the discharge process in elderly patients. Further testing in a wider population should be carried out before implementation in health care settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6221326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62213262018-11-19 Elderly patients’ (≥65 years) experiences associated with discharge; Development, validity and reliability of the Discharge Care Experiences Survey Boge, Ranveig Marie Haugen, Arvid Steinar Nilsen, Roy Miodini Harthug, Stig PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: A review of the literature reveals a lack of validated instruments that particularly measure quality in the hospital discharge process. This study aims to develop and validate a survey instrument feasible for measuring quality (≥65 years) related to the discharge process based on elderly patients’ experiences. METHODS: Construction of the Discharge Care Patient Experience Survey (DICARES) was based on 16 items identified by literature reviews. Intraclass correlation for test–retest was applied to assess consistency of the survey. Explorative factors analysis was applied to identify and validate the factor structures of the DICARES. Cronbach’s α was used to assess internal reliability. To evaluate the external validity of the final DICARES questionnaire the patients’ scores were correlated with scores obtained from the three other questionnaires; the Nordic Patient Experiences Questionnaire, the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey and Subjective Health Complaints. The DICARES association with readmissions was examined. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients responded (64.4%). The mean age of participants was 77.1 years and 57.8% were men. The exploratory factor analysis resulted in a 10-item instrument consisting of three factors explaining 63.5% of the total variance. The Cronbach’s α were satisfactory (≥70). Overall intraclass correlation was 0.76. A moderate Spearman correlation (rho = 0.54, p <0.01) was found between the total mean DICARES score and total mean score of the Nordic Patient Experiences Questionnaire. The total mean DICARES score was inversely associated with the quality indicator based on readmissions (OR 0.62, CI 95: 0.41–0.95, p = 0.028) CONCLUSION: We have developed a 10-item questionnaire consisting of three factors which may be a feasible instrument for measuring quality of the discharge process in elderly patients. Further testing in a wider population should be carried out before implementation in health care settings. Public Library of Science 2018-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6221326/ /pubmed/30403738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206904 Text en © 2018 Boge et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boge, Ranveig Marie
Haugen, Arvid Steinar
Nilsen, Roy Miodini
Harthug, Stig
Elderly patients’ (≥65 years) experiences associated with discharge; Development, validity and reliability of the Discharge Care Experiences Survey
title Elderly patients’ (≥65 years) experiences associated with discharge; Development, validity and reliability of the Discharge Care Experiences Survey
title_full Elderly patients’ (≥65 years) experiences associated with discharge; Development, validity and reliability of the Discharge Care Experiences Survey
title_fullStr Elderly patients’ (≥65 years) experiences associated with discharge; Development, validity and reliability of the Discharge Care Experiences Survey
title_full_unstemmed Elderly patients’ (≥65 years) experiences associated with discharge; Development, validity and reliability of the Discharge Care Experiences Survey
title_short Elderly patients’ (≥65 years) experiences associated with discharge; Development, validity and reliability of the Discharge Care Experiences Survey
title_sort elderly patients’ (≥65 years) experiences associated with discharge; development, validity and reliability of the discharge care experiences survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30403738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206904
work_keys_str_mv AT bogeranveigmarie elderlypatients65yearsexperiencesassociatedwithdischargedevelopmentvalidityandreliabilityofthedischargecareexperiencessurvey
AT haugenarvidsteinar elderlypatients65yearsexperiencesassociatedwithdischargedevelopmentvalidityandreliabilityofthedischargecareexperiencessurvey
AT nilsenroymiodini elderlypatients65yearsexperiencesassociatedwithdischargedevelopmentvalidityandreliabilityofthedischargecareexperiencessurvey
AT harthugstig elderlypatients65yearsexperiencesassociatedwithdischargedevelopmentvalidityandreliabilityofthedischargecareexperiencessurvey