Cargando…
Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study
BACKGROUND: Juvéderm Vollure XC (VYC-17.5L) belongs to a family of nonanimal hyaluronic acid (HA) gels based on the Vycross technology platform. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VYC-17.5L for correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLFs) compared with a control HA de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29701621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001529 |
_version_ | 1783369014272065536 |
---|---|
author | Monheit, Gary Beer, Kenneth Hardas, Bhushan Grimes, Pearl E. Weichman, Barry M. Lin, Vince Murphy, Diane K. |
author_facet | Monheit, Gary Beer, Kenneth Hardas, Bhushan Grimes, Pearl E. Weichman, Barry M. Lin, Vince Murphy, Diane K. |
author_sort | Monheit, Gary |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Juvéderm Vollure XC (VYC-17.5L) belongs to a family of nonanimal hyaluronic acid (HA) gels based on the Vycross technology platform. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VYC-17.5L for correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLFs) compared with a control HA dermal filler. METHODS: In this double-blind study, 123 adults with 2 moderate or severe NLFs as measured on the 5-point photonumeric NLF severity scale (NLFSS) were randomized to VYC-17.5L in 1 NLF and control in the contralateral NLF. The coprimary effectiveness end points at Month 6 were difference in improvement in mean NLFSS score for VYC-17.5L versus control and NLFSS responder rate (≥1-point improvement) for VYC-17.5L. RESULTS: The coprimary effectiveness end points were met. NLFSS scores improved by 1.4 with VYC-17.5L and by 1.3 with control; NLFSS responder rate with VYC-17.5L was 93.2%. More than three-quarters of subjects (82%) treated with VYC-17.5L were very satisfied at Month 6. Investigators reported that VYC-17.5L was smoother and more natural looking and easier to inject and mold than control. VYC-17.5L resulted in significantly fewer severe injection site responses than control. CONCLUSION: VYC-17.5L was safe and effective for correcting moderate to severe NLFs, with results lasting through 6 months in 93% of subjects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6221389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62213892018-11-21 Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study Monheit, Gary Beer, Kenneth Hardas, Bhushan Grimes, Pearl E. Weichman, Barry M. Lin, Vince Murphy, Diane K. Dermatol Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Juvéderm Vollure XC (VYC-17.5L) belongs to a family of nonanimal hyaluronic acid (HA) gels based on the Vycross technology platform. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VYC-17.5L for correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLFs) compared with a control HA dermal filler. METHODS: In this double-blind study, 123 adults with 2 moderate or severe NLFs as measured on the 5-point photonumeric NLF severity scale (NLFSS) were randomized to VYC-17.5L in 1 NLF and control in the contralateral NLF. The coprimary effectiveness end points at Month 6 were difference in improvement in mean NLFSS score for VYC-17.5L versus control and NLFSS responder rate (≥1-point improvement) for VYC-17.5L. RESULTS: The coprimary effectiveness end points were met. NLFSS scores improved by 1.4 with VYC-17.5L and by 1.3 with control; NLFSS responder rate with VYC-17.5L was 93.2%. More than three-quarters of subjects (82%) treated with VYC-17.5L were very satisfied at Month 6. Investigators reported that VYC-17.5L was smoother and more natural looking and easier to inject and mold than control. VYC-17.5L resulted in significantly fewer severe injection site responses than control. CONCLUSION: VYC-17.5L was safe and effective for correcting moderate to severe NLFs, with results lasting through 6 months in 93% of subjects. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-05 2018-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6221389/ /pubmed/29701621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001529 Text en © 2018 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Monheit, Gary Beer, Kenneth Hardas, Bhushan Grimes, Pearl E. Weichman, Barry M. Lin, Vince Murphy, Diane K. Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study |
title | Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study |
title_full | Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study |
title_fullStr | Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study |
title_short | Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study |
title_sort | safety and effectiveness of the hyaluronic acid dermal filler vyc-17.5l for nasolabial folds: results of a randomized, controlled study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29701621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001529 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monheitgary safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT beerkenneth safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hardasbhushan safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT grimespearle safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT weichmanbarrym safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT linvince safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT murphydianek safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy |