Cargando…

Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study

BACKGROUND: Juvéderm Vollure XC (VYC-17.5L) belongs to a family of nonanimal hyaluronic acid (HA) gels based on the Vycross technology platform. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VYC-17.5L for correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLFs) compared with a control HA de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monheit, Gary, Beer, Kenneth, Hardas, Bhushan, Grimes, Pearl E., Weichman, Barry M., Lin, Vince, Murphy, Diane K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29701621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001529
_version_ 1783369014272065536
author Monheit, Gary
Beer, Kenneth
Hardas, Bhushan
Grimes, Pearl E.
Weichman, Barry M.
Lin, Vince
Murphy, Diane K.
author_facet Monheit, Gary
Beer, Kenneth
Hardas, Bhushan
Grimes, Pearl E.
Weichman, Barry M.
Lin, Vince
Murphy, Diane K.
author_sort Monheit, Gary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Juvéderm Vollure XC (VYC-17.5L) belongs to a family of nonanimal hyaluronic acid (HA) gels based on the Vycross technology platform. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VYC-17.5L for correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLFs) compared with a control HA dermal filler. METHODS: In this double-blind study, 123 adults with 2 moderate or severe NLFs as measured on the 5-point photonumeric NLF severity scale (NLFSS) were randomized to VYC-17.5L in 1 NLF and control in the contralateral NLF. The coprimary effectiveness end points at Month 6 were difference in improvement in mean NLFSS score for VYC-17.5L versus control and NLFSS responder rate (≥1-point improvement) for VYC-17.5L. RESULTS: The coprimary effectiveness end points were met. NLFSS scores improved by 1.4 with VYC-17.5L and by 1.3 with control; NLFSS responder rate with VYC-17.5L was 93.2%. More than three-quarters of subjects (82%) treated with VYC-17.5L were very satisfied at Month 6. Investigators reported that VYC-17.5L was smoother and more natural looking and easier to inject and mold than control. VYC-17.5L resulted in significantly fewer severe injection site responses than control. CONCLUSION: VYC-17.5L was safe and effective for correcting moderate to severe NLFs, with results lasting through 6 months in 93% of subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6221389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62213892018-11-21 Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study Monheit, Gary Beer, Kenneth Hardas, Bhushan Grimes, Pearl E. Weichman, Barry M. Lin, Vince Murphy, Diane K. Dermatol Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Juvéderm Vollure XC (VYC-17.5L) belongs to a family of nonanimal hyaluronic acid (HA) gels based on the Vycross technology platform. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VYC-17.5L for correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds (NLFs) compared with a control HA dermal filler. METHODS: In this double-blind study, 123 adults with 2 moderate or severe NLFs as measured on the 5-point photonumeric NLF severity scale (NLFSS) were randomized to VYC-17.5L in 1 NLF and control in the contralateral NLF. The coprimary effectiveness end points at Month 6 were difference in improvement in mean NLFSS score for VYC-17.5L versus control and NLFSS responder rate (≥1-point improvement) for VYC-17.5L. RESULTS: The coprimary effectiveness end points were met. NLFSS scores improved by 1.4 with VYC-17.5L and by 1.3 with control; NLFSS responder rate with VYC-17.5L was 93.2%. More than three-quarters of subjects (82%) treated with VYC-17.5L were very satisfied at Month 6. Investigators reported that VYC-17.5L was smoother and more natural looking and easier to inject and mold than control. VYC-17.5L resulted in significantly fewer severe injection site responses than control. CONCLUSION: VYC-17.5L was safe and effective for correcting moderate to severe NLFs, with results lasting through 6 months in 93% of subjects. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-05 2018-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6221389/ /pubmed/29701621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001529 Text en © 2018 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Article
Monheit, Gary
Beer, Kenneth
Hardas, Bhushan
Grimes, Pearl E.
Weichman, Barry M.
Lin, Vince
Murphy, Diane K.
Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study
title Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study
title_full Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study
title_fullStr Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study
title_short Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler VYC-17.5L for Nasolabial Folds: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study
title_sort safety and effectiveness of the hyaluronic acid dermal filler vyc-17.5l for nasolabial folds: results of a randomized, controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29701621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001529
work_keys_str_mv AT monheitgary safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT beerkenneth safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hardasbhushan safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT grimespearle safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT weichmanbarrym safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT linvince safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT murphydianek safetyandeffectivenessofthehyaluronicaciddermalfillervyc175lfornasolabialfoldsresultsofarandomizedcontrolledstudy