Cargando…

Reference values of bioelectrical impedance analysis for detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema

Secondary lymphedema is a chronic debilitating lifelong complication and early diagnosis is crucial. The Inbody 720, which is widely used, has no universal index of diagnostic criteria for test results. We aim to determine the normal range, cutoff values, and mean + standard deviation values of extr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Minji, Jeon, Jae Yong, Yun, Gi Jeong, Yang, Seoyon, Kwon, Sara, Seo, Yu Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30383644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012945
_version_ 1783369074487590912
author Jung, Minji
Jeon, Jae Yong
Yun, Gi Jeong
Yang, Seoyon
Kwon, Sara
Seo, Yu Jin
author_facet Jung, Minji
Jeon, Jae Yong
Yun, Gi Jeong
Yang, Seoyon
Kwon, Sara
Seo, Yu Jin
author_sort Jung, Minji
collection PubMed
description Secondary lymphedema is a chronic debilitating lifelong complication and early diagnosis is crucial. The Inbody 720, which is widely used, has no universal index of diagnostic criteria for test results. We aim to determine the normal range, cutoff values, and mean + standard deviation values of extracellular fluid (ECF) and the single frequency bioimpedance (SFBIA) ratios for the diagnosis of lymphedema and suggest the usefulness of these values for detecting lymphedema. Seventy patients with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema and 643 healthy subjects were enrolled. All patients with breast cancer underwent surgeries with dissection of lymph nodes. We analyzed the ECF volume, SFBIA at 1- and 5-kHz frequencies using Inbody 720. There were significant differences between patients with BCRL and healthy controls. The optimal cutoff values for ECF ratios were 1.010 for both the dominant and non-dominant arms. At 1 kHz, the cutoff values of SFBIA were 1.050 and 1.046, and at 5 kHz, those were 1.070 and 1.030 for the dominant and non-dominant affected arms, respectively. The mean + 2SD values for ECF ratio were 1.018 and 1.020 and at 1 kHz, the mean + 2SD values of SFBIA were 1.144 and 1.0135 and at 5 kHz, the cutoff values of SFBIA were 1.141 and 1.124 for the dominant and non-dominant affected arms, respectively. The mean + 3SD values for ECF ratio were 1.026 and 1.030 and at 1 kHz, the mean + 3SD values of SFBIA were 1.206 and 1.203 and at 5 kHz, those were 1.201 and 1.187 for the arms, respectively. The cutoff, mean + 2SD, and mean + 3SD values were applied to 70 patients with unilateral BCRL. When the cutoff values were applied, a higher proportion of BCRL patients were included. When these figures were applied to the patient group, the cutoff values included a higher proportion of patients with lymphedema. Further studies are needed to investigate whether bioimpedance analysis can accurately predict the development of lymphedema.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6221712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62217122018-12-04 Reference values of bioelectrical impedance analysis for detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema Jung, Minji Jeon, Jae Yong Yun, Gi Jeong Yang, Seoyon Kwon, Sara Seo, Yu Jin Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Secondary lymphedema is a chronic debilitating lifelong complication and early diagnosis is crucial. The Inbody 720, which is widely used, has no universal index of diagnostic criteria for test results. We aim to determine the normal range, cutoff values, and mean + standard deviation values of extracellular fluid (ECF) and the single frequency bioimpedance (SFBIA) ratios for the diagnosis of lymphedema and suggest the usefulness of these values for detecting lymphedema. Seventy patients with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema and 643 healthy subjects were enrolled. All patients with breast cancer underwent surgeries with dissection of lymph nodes. We analyzed the ECF volume, SFBIA at 1- and 5-kHz frequencies using Inbody 720. There were significant differences between patients with BCRL and healthy controls. The optimal cutoff values for ECF ratios were 1.010 for both the dominant and non-dominant arms. At 1 kHz, the cutoff values of SFBIA were 1.050 and 1.046, and at 5 kHz, those were 1.070 and 1.030 for the dominant and non-dominant affected arms, respectively. The mean + 2SD values for ECF ratio were 1.018 and 1.020 and at 1 kHz, the mean + 2SD values of SFBIA were 1.144 and 1.0135 and at 5 kHz, the cutoff values of SFBIA were 1.141 and 1.124 for the dominant and non-dominant affected arms, respectively. The mean + 3SD values for ECF ratio were 1.026 and 1.030 and at 1 kHz, the mean + 3SD values of SFBIA were 1.206 and 1.203 and at 5 kHz, those were 1.201 and 1.187 for the arms, respectively. The cutoff, mean + 2SD, and mean + 3SD values were applied to 70 patients with unilateral BCRL. When the cutoff values were applied, a higher proportion of BCRL patients were included. When these figures were applied to the patient group, the cutoff values included a higher proportion of patients with lymphedema. Further studies are needed to investigate whether bioimpedance analysis can accurately predict the development of lymphedema. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6221712/ /pubmed/30383644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012945 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Jung, Minji
Jeon, Jae Yong
Yun, Gi Jeong
Yang, Seoyon
Kwon, Sara
Seo, Yu Jin
Reference values of bioelectrical impedance analysis for detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema
title Reference values of bioelectrical impedance analysis for detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema
title_full Reference values of bioelectrical impedance analysis for detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema
title_fullStr Reference values of bioelectrical impedance analysis for detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema
title_full_unstemmed Reference values of bioelectrical impedance analysis for detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema
title_short Reference values of bioelectrical impedance analysis for detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema
title_sort reference values of bioelectrical impedance analysis for detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30383644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012945
work_keys_str_mv AT jungminji referencevaluesofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisfordetectingbreastcancerrelatedlymphedema
AT jeonjaeyong referencevaluesofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisfordetectingbreastcancerrelatedlymphedema
AT yungijeong referencevaluesofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisfordetectingbreastcancerrelatedlymphedema
AT yangseoyon referencevaluesofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisfordetectingbreastcancerrelatedlymphedema
AT kwonsara referencevaluesofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisfordetectingbreastcancerrelatedlymphedema
AT seoyujin referencevaluesofbioelectricalimpedanceanalysisfordetectingbreastcancerrelatedlymphedema