Cargando…
ADR evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 – 2017 in a private health clinic in Peru
Background and study aims High-quality colonoscopy is fundamental for preventing colorectal cancer (CRC). The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key colonoscopy quality measure. The aim of this study was to establish the screening colonoscopy ADR of a tertiary referral center in Peru, identify the r...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0672-1045 |
_version_ | 1783369087542362112 |
---|---|
author | León Moreno, Julio F. |
author_facet | León Moreno, Julio F. |
author_sort | León Moreno, Julio F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims High-quality colonoscopy is fundamental for preventing colorectal cancer (CRC). The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key colonoscopy quality measure. The aim of this study was to establish the screening colonoscopy ADR of a tertiary referral center in Peru, identify the relationship between the ADR and patient age, sex and the colonoscopist, and determine the endoscopic and histopathological characteristics of the lesions found. Patients and methods A retrospective observational longitudinal study was undertaken between January 2016 and June 2017. Results Eight colonoscopists performed screening colonoscopies on 620 patients scoring ≥ 6 points on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS); cecal intubation was complete in 595 patients (cecal intubation rate [CIR] 95.9 %). The overall ADR was 29.7 % (females 25.4 %, males 33.1 %, P = 0.040, 95 %Cl). The ADR colonoscopist range was 25.0 % to 34.4 %. The highest ADR (41.2 %, P = 0.013, 95 %Cl) was for patients aged 65 to 75 years. Adenoma colon locations were: left 49 %, transverse 21.6 % and right 29.4 %. Adenoma dysplasia grades: low 98 %, high 2 %. Sixty-three percent of the lesions were 5 mm to 10 mm. Resections performed: 78.5 % cold biopsy forceps (CBF), 3.4 % cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and 18.1 % endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Conclusions The ADR established was in line with the joint American College of Gastroenterology (ACG)/American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) recommendations and related to patient age and gender but not to the colonoscopist. Colonoscopists should ensure rigorous application of the colonoscopy quality actions. ADR should be evaluated frequently. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6221814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62218142018-11-08 ADR evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 – 2017 in a private health clinic in Peru León Moreno, Julio F. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims High-quality colonoscopy is fundamental for preventing colorectal cancer (CRC). The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key colonoscopy quality measure. The aim of this study was to establish the screening colonoscopy ADR of a tertiary referral center in Peru, identify the relationship between the ADR and patient age, sex and the colonoscopist, and determine the endoscopic and histopathological characteristics of the lesions found. Patients and methods A retrospective observational longitudinal study was undertaken between January 2016 and June 2017. Results Eight colonoscopists performed screening colonoscopies on 620 patients scoring ≥ 6 points on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS); cecal intubation was complete in 595 patients (cecal intubation rate [CIR] 95.9 %). The overall ADR was 29.7 % (females 25.4 %, males 33.1 %, P = 0.040, 95 %Cl). The ADR colonoscopist range was 25.0 % to 34.4 %. The highest ADR (41.2 %, P = 0.013, 95 %Cl) was for patients aged 65 to 75 years. Adenoma colon locations were: left 49 %, transverse 21.6 % and right 29.4 %. Adenoma dysplasia grades: low 98 %, high 2 %. Sixty-three percent of the lesions were 5 mm to 10 mm. Resections performed: 78.5 % cold biopsy forceps (CBF), 3.4 % cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and 18.1 % endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Conclusions The ADR established was in line with the joint American College of Gastroenterology (ACG)/American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) recommendations and related to patient age and gender but not to the colonoscopist. Colonoscopists should ensure rigorous application of the colonoscopy quality actions. ADR should be evaluated frequently. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-11 2018-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6221814/ /pubmed/30410949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0672-1045 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | León Moreno, Julio F. ADR evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 – 2017 in a private health clinic in Peru |
title | ADR evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 – 2017 in a private health clinic in Peru |
title_full | ADR evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 – 2017 in a private health clinic in Peru |
title_fullStr | ADR evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 – 2017 in a private health clinic in Peru |
title_full_unstemmed | ADR evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 – 2017 in a private health clinic in Peru |
title_short | ADR evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 – 2017 in a private health clinic in Peru |
title_sort | adr evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 – 2017 in a private health clinic in peru |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6221814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0672-1045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leonmorenojuliof adrevaluationofscreeningcolonoscopiesduring20162017inaprivatehealthclinicinperu |