Cargando…

Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects

OBJECTIVE: Deterioration of cutaneous perception may be one reason for the increased rate of falling in the elderly. The stochastic resonance phenomenon may compensate this loss of information by improving the capability to detect and transfer weak signals. In the present study, we hypothesize that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zippenfennig, Claudio, Niklaus, Laura, Karger, Katrin, Milani, Thomas L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6222028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30560218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.10.001
_version_ 1783369120566214656
author Zippenfennig, Claudio
Niklaus, Laura
Karger, Katrin
Milani, Thomas L.
author_facet Zippenfennig, Claudio
Niklaus, Laura
Karger, Katrin
Milani, Thomas L.
author_sort Zippenfennig, Claudio
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Deterioration of cutaneous perception may be one reason for the increased rate of falling in the elderly. The stochastic resonance phenomenon may compensate this loss of information by improving the capability to detect and transfer weak signals. In the present study, we hypothesize that subliminal electrical and mechanical noise applied to the sole of the foot of healthy elderly subjects improves vibration perception thresholds (VPT). METHODS: VPTs of 99 healthy elderly subjects were measured at 30 Hz at the heel and first metatarsal head (MET I). Participants were randomly assigned to one of five groups: vibration (Vi-G), current (Cu-G), control (Co-G), placebo-vibration (Pl-Vi), and placebo-current (Pl-Cu). Vi-G and Cu-G were stimulated using 90% (subliminal) of their individual perception thresholds for five minutes in a standing position. Co-G received no stimulation. The placebo groups were treated with mock stimulation. VPTs were measured twice before the intervention (baseline (BASE) and pre-measurement (PRE)), and once after the intervention (post-measurement (POST)). RESULTS: Significant differences were found between measurement conditions comparing BASE and POST, and PRE and POST. VPTs between groups within each measurement condition showed no significant differences. Vi-G was the only group that showed significantly higher VPTs in POST compared to BASE and PRE, which contradicts previous studies. CONCLUSION: We analyzed increased VPTs after subliminal mechanical stimulation. The pressure load of standing for five minutes combined with subliminal stimulation may have shifted the initial level of mechanoreceptor sensitivity, which may lead to a deterioration of the VPT. The subliminal electrical stimulation had no effect on VPT. SIGNIFICANCE: Based on our results, we cannot confirm positive effects of subliminal electrical or mechanical stimulation on the sole of the foot.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6222028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62220282018-12-17 Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects Zippenfennig, Claudio Niklaus, Laura Karger, Katrin Milani, Thomas L. Clin Neurophysiol Pract Clinical and Research Article OBJECTIVE: Deterioration of cutaneous perception may be one reason for the increased rate of falling in the elderly. The stochastic resonance phenomenon may compensate this loss of information by improving the capability to detect and transfer weak signals. In the present study, we hypothesize that subliminal electrical and mechanical noise applied to the sole of the foot of healthy elderly subjects improves vibration perception thresholds (VPT). METHODS: VPTs of 99 healthy elderly subjects were measured at 30 Hz at the heel and first metatarsal head (MET I). Participants were randomly assigned to one of five groups: vibration (Vi-G), current (Cu-G), control (Co-G), placebo-vibration (Pl-Vi), and placebo-current (Pl-Cu). Vi-G and Cu-G were stimulated using 90% (subliminal) of their individual perception thresholds for five minutes in a standing position. Co-G received no stimulation. The placebo groups were treated with mock stimulation. VPTs were measured twice before the intervention (baseline (BASE) and pre-measurement (PRE)), and once after the intervention (post-measurement (POST)). RESULTS: Significant differences were found between measurement conditions comparing BASE and POST, and PRE and POST. VPTs between groups within each measurement condition showed no significant differences. Vi-G was the only group that showed significantly higher VPTs in POST compared to BASE and PRE, which contradicts previous studies. CONCLUSION: We analyzed increased VPTs after subliminal mechanical stimulation. The pressure load of standing for five minutes combined with subliminal stimulation may have shifted the initial level of mechanoreceptor sensitivity, which may lead to a deterioration of the VPT. The subliminal electrical stimulation had no effect on VPT. SIGNIFICANCE: Based on our results, we cannot confirm positive effects of subliminal electrical or mechanical stimulation on the sole of the foot. Elsevier 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6222028/ /pubmed/30560218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.10.001 Text en © 2018 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical and Research Article
Zippenfennig, Claudio
Niklaus, Laura
Karger, Katrin
Milani, Thomas L.
Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects
title Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects
title_full Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects
title_fullStr Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects
title_full_unstemmed Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects
title_short Subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects
title_sort subliminal electrical and mechanical stimulation does not improve foot sensitivity in healthy elderly subjects
topic Clinical and Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6222028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30560218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT zippenfennigclaudio subliminalelectricalandmechanicalstimulationdoesnotimprovefootsensitivityinhealthyelderlysubjects
AT niklauslaura subliminalelectricalandmechanicalstimulationdoesnotimprovefootsensitivityinhealthyelderlysubjects
AT kargerkatrin subliminalelectricalandmechanicalstimulationdoesnotimprovefootsensitivityinhealthyelderlysubjects
AT milanithomasl subliminalelectricalandmechanicalstimulationdoesnotimprovefootsensitivityinhealthyelderlysubjects