Cargando…

HS-SPME-GC-MS Analyses of Volatiles in Plant Populations—Quantitating Compound × Individual Matrix Effects

Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is widely employed for volatile analyses of plants, including mapping populations used in plant breeding research. Studies often employ a single internal surrogate standard, even when multiple ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burzynski-Chang, Elizabeth A., Ryona, Imelda, Reisch, Bruce I., Gonda, Itay, Foolad, Majid R., Giovannoni, James J., Sacks, Gavin L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6222754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30249067
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102436
_version_ 1783369280583106560
author Burzynski-Chang, Elizabeth A.
Ryona, Imelda
Reisch, Bruce I.
Gonda, Itay
Foolad, Majid R.
Giovannoni, James J.
Sacks, Gavin L.
author_facet Burzynski-Chang, Elizabeth A.
Ryona, Imelda
Reisch, Bruce I.
Gonda, Itay
Foolad, Majid R.
Giovannoni, James J.
Sacks, Gavin L.
author_sort Burzynski-Chang, Elizabeth A.
collection PubMed
description Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is widely employed for volatile analyses of plants, including mapping populations used in plant breeding research. Studies often employ a single internal surrogate standard, even when multiple analytes are measured, with the assumption that any relative changes in matrix effects among individuals would be similar for all compounds, i.e., matrix effects do not show Compound × Individual interactions. We tested this assumption using individuals from two plant populations: an interspecific grape (Vitis spp.) mapping population (n = 140) and a tomato (Solanum spp.) recombinant inbred line (RIL) population (n = 148). Individual plants from the two populations were spiked with a cocktail of internal standards (n = 6, 9, respectively) prior to HS-SPME-GC-MS. Variation in the relative responses of internal standards indicated that Compound × Individual interactions exist but were different between the two populations. For the grape population, relative responses among pairs of internal standards varied considerably among individuals, with a maximum of 249% relative standard deviation (RSD) for the pair of [U(13)C]hexanal and [U(13)C]hexanol. However, in the tomato population, relative responses of internal standard pairs varied much less, with pairwise RSDs ranging from 8% to 56%. The approach described in this paper could be used to evaluate the suitability of using surrogate standards for HS-SPME-GC-MS studies in other plant populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6222754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62227542018-11-13 HS-SPME-GC-MS Analyses of Volatiles in Plant Populations—Quantitating Compound × Individual Matrix Effects Burzynski-Chang, Elizabeth A. Ryona, Imelda Reisch, Bruce I. Gonda, Itay Foolad, Majid R. Giovannoni, James J. Sacks, Gavin L. Molecules Article Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is widely employed for volatile analyses of plants, including mapping populations used in plant breeding research. Studies often employ a single internal surrogate standard, even when multiple analytes are measured, with the assumption that any relative changes in matrix effects among individuals would be similar for all compounds, i.e., matrix effects do not show Compound × Individual interactions. We tested this assumption using individuals from two plant populations: an interspecific grape (Vitis spp.) mapping population (n = 140) and a tomato (Solanum spp.) recombinant inbred line (RIL) population (n = 148). Individual plants from the two populations were spiked with a cocktail of internal standards (n = 6, 9, respectively) prior to HS-SPME-GC-MS. Variation in the relative responses of internal standards indicated that Compound × Individual interactions exist but were different between the two populations. For the grape population, relative responses among pairs of internal standards varied considerably among individuals, with a maximum of 249% relative standard deviation (RSD) for the pair of [U(13)C]hexanal and [U(13)C]hexanol. However, in the tomato population, relative responses of internal standard pairs varied much less, with pairwise RSDs ranging from 8% to 56%. The approach described in this paper could be used to evaluate the suitability of using surrogate standards for HS-SPME-GC-MS studies in other plant populations. MDPI 2018-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6222754/ /pubmed/30249067 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102436 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Burzynski-Chang, Elizabeth A.
Ryona, Imelda
Reisch, Bruce I.
Gonda, Itay
Foolad, Majid R.
Giovannoni, James J.
Sacks, Gavin L.
HS-SPME-GC-MS Analyses of Volatiles in Plant Populations—Quantitating Compound × Individual Matrix Effects
title HS-SPME-GC-MS Analyses of Volatiles in Plant Populations—Quantitating Compound × Individual Matrix Effects
title_full HS-SPME-GC-MS Analyses of Volatiles in Plant Populations—Quantitating Compound × Individual Matrix Effects
title_fullStr HS-SPME-GC-MS Analyses of Volatiles in Plant Populations—Quantitating Compound × Individual Matrix Effects
title_full_unstemmed HS-SPME-GC-MS Analyses of Volatiles in Plant Populations—Quantitating Compound × Individual Matrix Effects
title_short HS-SPME-GC-MS Analyses of Volatiles in Plant Populations—Quantitating Compound × Individual Matrix Effects
title_sort hs-spme-gc-ms analyses of volatiles in plant populations—quantitating compound × individual matrix effects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6222754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30249067
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102436
work_keys_str_mv AT burzynskichangelizabetha hsspmegcmsanalysesofvolatilesinplantpopulationsquantitatingcompoundindividualmatrixeffects
AT ryonaimelda hsspmegcmsanalysesofvolatilesinplantpopulationsquantitatingcompoundindividualmatrixeffects
AT reischbrucei hsspmegcmsanalysesofvolatilesinplantpopulationsquantitatingcompoundindividualmatrixeffects
AT gondaitay hsspmegcmsanalysesofvolatilesinplantpopulationsquantitatingcompoundindividualmatrixeffects
AT fooladmajidr hsspmegcmsanalysesofvolatilesinplantpopulationsquantitatingcompoundindividualmatrixeffects
AT giovannonijamesj hsspmegcmsanalysesofvolatilesinplantpopulationsquantitatingcompoundindividualmatrixeffects
AT sacksgavinl hsspmegcmsanalysesofvolatilesinplantpopulationsquantitatingcompoundindividualmatrixeffects