Cargando…
Bottom-up processing of curvilinear visual features is sufficient for animate/inanimate object categorization
Animate and inanimate objects differ in their intermediate visual features. For instance, animate objects tend to be more curvilinear compared to inanimate objects (e.g., Levin, Takarae, Miner, & Keil, 2001). Recently, it has been demonstrated that these differences in the intermediate visual fe...
Autores principales: | Zachariou, Valentinos, Del Giacco, Amanda C., Ungerleider, Leslie G., Yue, Xiaomin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6222807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30458511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/18.12.3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Curvilinear features are important for animate/inanimate categorization in macaques
por: Yetter, Marissa, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Fast responses to images of animate and inanimate objects in the nonhuman primate amygdala
por: Cleeren, E., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
On the divide between animate and inanimate
por: Annila, Arto, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Capgras delusion for animals and inanimate objects in Parkinson’s Disease: a case report
por: Islam, Lucrezia, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
On Lighting; Its Forms, and Its Effects on Man, on Animals, and on Inanimate Objects, &c.
Publicado: (1867)