Cargando…
Prognostic Significance of Pulse Pressure Variability During Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
BACKGROUND: Studies on the role of blood pressure (BP) variability specifically during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are sparse and limited. Moreover, pulse pressure (PP) has not been considered as a potent hemodynamic parameter to describe BP variability during MT. We assessed the impact of PP varia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6222945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30371208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009378 |
_version_ | 1783369325596377088 |
---|---|
author | Maïer, Benjamin Turc, Guillaume Taylor, Guillaume Blanc, Raphaël Obadia, Michael Smajda, Stanislas Desilles, Jean‐Philippe Redjem, Hocine Ciccio, Gabriele Boisseau, William Sabben, Candice Ben Machaa, Malek Hamdani, Mylene Leguen, Morgan Gayat, Etienne Blacher, Jacques Lapergue, Bertrand Piotin, Michel Mazighi, Mikael Cho, Tae‐Hee |
author_facet | Maïer, Benjamin Turc, Guillaume Taylor, Guillaume Blanc, Raphaël Obadia, Michael Smajda, Stanislas Desilles, Jean‐Philippe Redjem, Hocine Ciccio, Gabriele Boisseau, William Sabben, Candice Ben Machaa, Malek Hamdani, Mylene Leguen, Morgan Gayat, Etienne Blacher, Jacques Lapergue, Bertrand Piotin, Michel Mazighi, Mikael Cho, Tae‐Hee |
author_sort | Maïer, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies on the role of blood pressure (BP) variability specifically during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are sparse and limited. Moreover, pulse pressure (PP) has not been considered as a potent hemodynamic parameter to describe BP variability during MT. We assessed the impact of PP variability on functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion during MT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Acute ischemic stroke patients presenting with large vessel occlusion from January 2012 to June 2016 were included. BP data during MT were prospectively collected in the ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) registry. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between PP coefficients of variation and functional outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale). Among the 343 included patients, PP variability was significantly associated with worse 3‐month modified Rankin Scale in univariable (odds ratio [OR]=1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24–1.96 per 1‐unit increase, P=0.0002) and multivariable ordinal logistic regression (adjusted OR=1.40, 95% CI: 1.09–1.79, P=0.008). PP variability was also associated with unfavorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 3–6) in univariable (OR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.17–2.01, P=0.002) and multivariable analysis (adjusted OR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.02–1.98, P=0.04). There was an association between PP variability and 3‐month all‐cause mortality in univariable analysis (OR= 1.37, 95% CI: 1.01–1.85 per 1‐unit increase of the coefficient of variation of the PP, P=0.04), which did not remain significant after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: PP variability during MT is an independent predictor of worse clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients. These findings support the need for a close monitoring of BP variability during MT. Whether pharmacological interventions aiming at reducing BP variability during MT could impact functional outcome needs to be determined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6222945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62229452018-11-19 Prognostic Significance of Pulse Pressure Variability During Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Maïer, Benjamin Turc, Guillaume Taylor, Guillaume Blanc, Raphaël Obadia, Michael Smajda, Stanislas Desilles, Jean‐Philippe Redjem, Hocine Ciccio, Gabriele Boisseau, William Sabben, Candice Ben Machaa, Malek Hamdani, Mylene Leguen, Morgan Gayat, Etienne Blacher, Jacques Lapergue, Bertrand Piotin, Michel Mazighi, Mikael Cho, Tae‐Hee J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Studies on the role of blood pressure (BP) variability specifically during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are sparse and limited. Moreover, pulse pressure (PP) has not been considered as a potent hemodynamic parameter to describe BP variability during MT. We assessed the impact of PP variability on functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion during MT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Acute ischemic stroke patients presenting with large vessel occlusion from January 2012 to June 2016 were included. BP data during MT were prospectively collected in the ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) registry. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between PP coefficients of variation and functional outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale). Among the 343 included patients, PP variability was significantly associated with worse 3‐month modified Rankin Scale in univariable (odds ratio [OR]=1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24–1.96 per 1‐unit increase, P=0.0002) and multivariable ordinal logistic regression (adjusted OR=1.40, 95% CI: 1.09–1.79, P=0.008). PP variability was also associated with unfavorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale 3–6) in univariable (OR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.17–2.01, P=0.002) and multivariable analysis (adjusted OR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.02–1.98, P=0.04). There was an association between PP variability and 3‐month all‐cause mortality in univariable analysis (OR= 1.37, 95% CI: 1.01–1.85 per 1‐unit increase of the coefficient of variation of the PP, P=0.04), which did not remain significant after adjustment for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: PP variability during MT is an independent predictor of worse clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients. These findings support the need for a close monitoring of BP variability during MT. Whether pharmacological interventions aiming at reducing BP variability during MT could impact functional outcome needs to be determined. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6222945/ /pubmed/30371208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009378 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Maïer, Benjamin Turc, Guillaume Taylor, Guillaume Blanc, Raphaël Obadia, Michael Smajda, Stanislas Desilles, Jean‐Philippe Redjem, Hocine Ciccio, Gabriele Boisseau, William Sabben, Candice Ben Machaa, Malek Hamdani, Mylene Leguen, Morgan Gayat, Etienne Blacher, Jacques Lapergue, Bertrand Piotin, Michel Mazighi, Mikael Cho, Tae‐Hee Prognostic Significance of Pulse Pressure Variability During Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients |
title | Prognostic Significance of Pulse Pressure Variability During Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients |
title_full | Prognostic Significance of Pulse Pressure Variability During Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Significance of Pulse Pressure Variability During Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Significance of Pulse Pressure Variability During Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients |
title_short | Prognostic Significance of Pulse Pressure Variability During Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients |
title_sort | prognostic significance of pulse pressure variability during mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6222945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30371208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.009378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maierbenjamin prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT turcguillaume prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT taylorguillaume prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT blancraphael prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT obadiamichael prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT smajdastanislas prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT desillesjeanphilippe prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT redjemhocine prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT cicciogabriele prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT boisseauwilliam prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT sabbencandice prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT benmachaamalek prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT hamdanimylene prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT leguenmorgan prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT gayatetienne prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT blacherjacques prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT laperguebertrand prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT piotinmichel prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT mazighimikael prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients AT chotaehee prognosticsignificanceofpulsepressurevariabilityduringmechanicalthrombectomyinacuteischemicstrokepatients |