Cargando…
A prospective case series evaluating use of an in-line air detection and purging system to reduce air burden during major surgery
BACKGROUND: Intravascular air embolism (AE) is a preventable but potentially catastrophic complication caused by intravenous tubing, trauma, and diagnostic and surgical procedures. The potentially fatal risks of arterial AE are well-known, and emerging evidence demonstrates impact of venous AEs on i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-018-0104-9 |
_version_ | 1783369340792340480 |
---|---|
author | Ibrahim, Yussr M. Marques, Nicole R. Garcia, Carlos R. Salter, Michael McQuitty, Christopher Kinsky, Michael Juan, Mindy Ludomirsky, Achiau |
author_facet | Ibrahim, Yussr M. Marques, Nicole R. Garcia, Carlos R. Salter, Michael McQuitty, Christopher Kinsky, Michael Juan, Mindy Ludomirsky, Achiau |
author_sort | Ibrahim, Yussr M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intravascular air embolism (AE) is a preventable but potentially catastrophic complication caused by intravenous tubing, trauma, and diagnostic and surgical procedures. The potentially fatal risks of arterial AE are well-known, and emerging evidence demonstrates impact of venous AEs on inflammatory response and coagulation factors. A novel FDA-approved in-line air detection and purging system was used to detect and remove air caused by administering a rapid fluid bolus during surgery. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, case series was conducted. Subjects were observed using standard monitors, including transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the operating room. After general anesthesia was induced, an introducer and pulmonary artery catheter was inserted in the right internal jugular to administer fluids and monitor cardiac pressures. Six patients undergoing cardiac surgery were studied. Each patient received four randomized fluid boluses: two with the in-line air purging device, two without. For each bolus, a bulb infuser was squeezed three times (10–15 mL) over 5 s. The TEE was positioned in the mid-esophageal right atrium (RA) to quantify peak air clearance, and images were video recorded throughout each bolus. Air was quantified using optical densitometry (OD) from images demonstrating maximal air in the RA. RESULTS: All subjects demonstrated significantly lower air burden when the air reduction device was used (p = 0.004), and the average time to clear 90% of air was also lower, 3.7 ± 1.2 s vs. 5.3 ± 1.3 s (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An air purging system reduced air burden from bolus administration and could consequently reduce the risk of harmful or fatal AEs during surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6223009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62230092018-11-19 A prospective case series evaluating use of an in-line air detection and purging system to reduce air burden during major surgery Ibrahim, Yussr M. Marques, Nicole R. Garcia, Carlos R. Salter, Michael McQuitty, Christopher Kinsky, Michael Juan, Mindy Ludomirsky, Achiau Perioper Med (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Intravascular air embolism (AE) is a preventable but potentially catastrophic complication caused by intravenous tubing, trauma, and diagnostic and surgical procedures. The potentially fatal risks of arterial AE are well-known, and emerging evidence demonstrates impact of venous AEs on inflammatory response and coagulation factors. A novel FDA-approved in-line air detection and purging system was used to detect and remove air caused by administering a rapid fluid bolus during surgery. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, case series was conducted. Subjects were observed using standard monitors, including transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the operating room. After general anesthesia was induced, an introducer and pulmonary artery catheter was inserted in the right internal jugular to administer fluids and monitor cardiac pressures. Six patients undergoing cardiac surgery were studied. Each patient received four randomized fluid boluses: two with the in-line air purging device, two without. For each bolus, a bulb infuser was squeezed three times (10–15 mL) over 5 s. The TEE was positioned in the mid-esophageal right atrium (RA) to quantify peak air clearance, and images were video recorded throughout each bolus. Air was quantified using optical densitometry (OD) from images demonstrating maximal air in the RA. RESULTS: All subjects demonstrated significantly lower air burden when the air reduction device was used (p = 0.004), and the average time to clear 90% of air was also lower, 3.7 ± 1.2 s vs. 5.3 ± 1.3 s (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An air purging system reduced air burden from bolus administration and could consequently reduce the risk of harmful or fatal AEs during surgery. BioMed Central 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6223009/ /pubmed/30455866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-018-0104-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ibrahim, Yussr M. Marques, Nicole R. Garcia, Carlos R. Salter, Michael McQuitty, Christopher Kinsky, Michael Juan, Mindy Ludomirsky, Achiau A prospective case series evaluating use of an in-line air detection and purging system to reduce air burden during major surgery |
title | A prospective case series evaluating use of an in-line air detection and purging system to reduce air burden during major surgery |
title_full | A prospective case series evaluating use of an in-line air detection and purging system to reduce air burden during major surgery |
title_fullStr | A prospective case series evaluating use of an in-line air detection and purging system to reduce air burden during major surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective case series evaluating use of an in-line air detection and purging system to reduce air burden during major surgery |
title_short | A prospective case series evaluating use of an in-line air detection and purging system to reduce air burden during major surgery |
title_sort | prospective case series evaluating use of an in-line air detection and purging system to reduce air burden during major surgery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13741-018-0104-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ibrahimyussrm aprospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT marquesnicoler aprospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT garciacarlosr aprospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT saltermichael aprospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT mcquittychristopher aprospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT kinskymichael aprospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT juanmindy aprospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT ludomirskyachiau aprospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT ibrahimyussrm prospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT marquesnicoler prospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT garciacarlosr prospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT saltermichael prospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT mcquittychristopher prospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT kinskymichael prospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT juanmindy prospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery AT ludomirskyachiau prospectivecaseseriesevaluatinguseofaninlineairdetectionandpurgingsystemtoreduceairburdenduringmajorsurgery |