Cargando…

Assessing the impact of choosing different deformable registration algorithms on cone-beam CT enhancement by histogram matching

BACKGROUND: The aim of this work is to assess the impact of using different deformable registration (DR) algorithms on the quality of cone-beam CT (CBCT) correction with histogram matching (HM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data sets containing planning CT (pCT) and CBCT images for ten patients with prost...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kidar, Halima Saadia, Azizi, Hacene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30404657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1162-3
_version_ 1783369345121910784
author Kidar, Halima Saadia
Azizi, Hacene
author_facet Kidar, Halima Saadia
Azizi, Hacene
author_sort Kidar, Halima Saadia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this work is to assess the impact of using different deformable registration (DR) algorithms on the quality of cone-beam CT (CBCT) correction with histogram matching (HM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data sets containing planning CT (pCT) and CBCT images for ten patients with prostate cancer were used. Each pCT image was registered to its corresponding CBCT image using one rigid registration algorithm with mutual information similarity metric (RR-MI) and three DR algorithms with normalized correlation coefficient, mutual information and normalized mutual information (DR-NCC, DR-MI and DR-NMI, respectively). Then, the HM was performed between deformed pCT and CBCT in order to correct the distribution of the Hounsfield Units (HU) in CBCT images. RESULTS: The visual assessment showed that the absolute difference between corrected CBCT and deformed pCT was reduced after correction with HM except for soft tissue-air and soft-tissue-bone interfaces due to the improper registration. Furthermore, volumes comparison in terms of average HU error showed that using DR-NCC algorithm with HM yielded the lowest error values of about 55.95 ± 10.43 HU compared to DR-MI and DR-NMI for which the errors were 58.60 ± 10.35 and 56.58 ± 10.51 HU, respectively. Tissue class’s comparison by the mean absolute error (MAE) plots confirmed the performance of DR-NCC algorithm to produce corrected CBCT images with lowest values of MAE even in regions where the misalignment is more pronounced. It was also found that the used method had successfully improved the spatial uniformity in the CBCT images by reducing the root mean squared difference (RMSD) between the pCT and CBCT in fat and muscle from 57 and 25 HU to 8HU, respectively. CONCLUSION: The choice of an accurate DR algorithm before performing the HM leads to an accurate correction of CBCT images. The results suggest that applying DR process based on NCC similarity metric reduces significantly the uncertainties in CBCT images and generates images in good agreement with pCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6223042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62230422018-11-19 Assessing the impact of choosing different deformable registration algorithms on cone-beam CT enhancement by histogram matching Kidar, Halima Saadia Azizi, Hacene Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this work is to assess the impact of using different deformable registration (DR) algorithms on the quality of cone-beam CT (CBCT) correction with histogram matching (HM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data sets containing planning CT (pCT) and CBCT images for ten patients with prostate cancer were used. Each pCT image was registered to its corresponding CBCT image using one rigid registration algorithm with mutual information similarity metric (RR-MI) and three DR algorithms with normalized correlation coefficient, mutual information and normalized mutual information (DR-NCC, DR-MI and DR-NMI, respectively). Then, the HM was performed between deformed pCT and CBCT in order to correct the distribution of the Hounsfield Units (HU) in CBCT images. RESULTS: The visual assessment showed that the absolute difference between corrected CBCT and deformed pCT was reduced after correction with HM except for soft tissue-air and soft-tissue-bone interfaces due to the improper registration. Furthermore, volumes comparison in terms of average HU error showed that using DR-NCC algorithm with HM yielded the lowest error values of about 55.95 ± 10.43 HU compared to DR-MI and DR-NMI for which the errors were 58.60 ± 10.35 and 56.58 ± 10.51 HU, respectively. Tissue class’s comparison by the mean absolute error (MAE) plots confirmed the performance of DR-NCC algorithm to produce corrected CBCT images with lowest values of MAE even in regions where the misalignment is more pronounced. It was also found that the used method had successfully improved the spatial uniformity in the CBCT images by reducing the root mean squared difference (RMSD) between the pCT and CBCT in fat and muscle from 57 and 25 HU to 8HU, respectively. CONCLUSION: The choice of an accurate DR algorithm before performing the HM leads to an accurate correction of CBCT images. The results suggest that applying DR process based on NCC similarity metric reduces significantly the uncertainties in CBCT images and generates images in good agreement with pCT. BioMed Central 2018-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6223042/ /pubmed/30404657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1162-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kidar, Halima Saadia
Azizi, Hacene
Assessing the impact of choosing different deformable registration algorithms on cone-beam CT enhancement by histogram matching
title Assessing the impact of choosing different deformable registration algorithms on cone-beam CT enhancement by histogram matching
title_full Assessing the impact of choosing different deformable registration algorithms on cone-beam CT enhancement by histogram matching
title_fullStr Assessing the impact of choosing different deformable registration algorithms on cone-beam CT enhancement by histogram matching
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the impact of choosing different deformable registration algorithms on cone-beam CT enhancement by histogram matching
title_short Assessing the impact of choosing different deformable registration algorithms on cone-beam CT enhancement by histogram matching
title_sort assessing the impact of choosing different deformable registration algorithms on cone-beam ct enhancement by histogram matching
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30404657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1162-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kidarhalimasaadia assessingtheimpactofchoosingdifferentdeformableregistrationalgorithmsonconebeamctenhancementbyhistogrammatching
AT azizihacene assessingtheimpactofchoosingdifferentdeformableregistrationalgorithmsonconebeamctenhancementbyhistogrammatching