Cargando…

Resource use and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug treatment

BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to compare resource use and clinical outcomes among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort design using the Clinical Practice Research Data-Hospital Episo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jarman, Julian W. E., Hussain, Wajid, Wong, Tom, Markides, Vias, March, Jamie, Goldstein, Laura, Liao, Ray, Kalsekar, Iftekhar, Chitnis, Abhishek, Khanna, Rahul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30404603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0946-6
_version_ 1783369349216600064
author Jarman, Julian W. E.
Hussain, Wajid
Wong, Tom
Markides, Vias
March, Jamie
Goldstein, Laura
Liao, Ray
Kalsekar, Iftekhar
Chitnis, Abhishek
Khanna, Rahul
author_facet Jarman, Julian W. E.
Hussain, Wajid
Wong, Tom
Markides, Vias
March, Jamie
Goldstein, Laura
Liao, Ray
Kalsekar, Iftekhar
Chitnis, Abhishek
Khanna, Rahul
author_sort Jarman, Julian W. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to compare resource use and clinical outcomes among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort design using the Clinical Practice Research Data-Hospital Episode Statistics linkage data from England (2008–2013) was used. Patients undergoing catheter ablation treatment for AF were indexed to the date of first procedure. AAD patients with at least two different AAD drugs were indexed to the first fill of the second AAD. Patients were matched using 1:1 propensity matching. Primary endpoints including inpatient and outpatient visits were compared between ablation and AAD cohorts in the 4 months-1 year period after index. Secondary endpoints including heart failure, stroke, cardioversion, mortality, and a composite outcome were compared for the 4 months-3 years post-index period in the two groups. Cox-proportional hazards models were estimated for clinical outcomes comparison. RESULTS: A total of 558 patients were matched in the two groups for resource utilization comparison. The average number of cardiovascular (CV)-related outpatient visits in the 4–12 months post-index period were significantly lower in the ablation group versus the AAD group (1.76 vs 3.57, p < .0001). There was no significant difference in all-cause and CV-related inpatient visits and all-cause outpatient visits among the two groups. For secondary endpoints comparison, 615 matched patients in each group emerged. Ablation patients had 38% lower risk of heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, p = 0.0318), 50% lower risk of mortality (HR 0.50, p = 0.0082), and 43% lower risk of experiencing a composite outcome (HR 0.57, p = 0.0009) as compared to AAD treatment cohort. CONCLUSION: AF ablation was associated with significantly lower CV-related outpatient visits, and lower risk of heart failure and mortality versus AAD therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6223058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62230582018-11-19 Resource use and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug treatment Jarman, Julian W. E. Hussain, Wajid Wong, Tom Markides, Vias March, Jamie Goldstein, Laura Liao, Ray Kalsekar, Iftekhar Chitnis, Abhishek Khanna, Rahul BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to compare resource use and clinical outcomes among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who underwent catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment. METHODS: A retrospective cohort design using the Clinical Practice Research Data-Hospital Episode Statistics linkage data from England (2008–2013) was used. Patients undergoing catheter ablation treatment for AF were indexed to the date of first procedure. AAD patients with at least two different AAD drugs were indexed to the first fill of the second AAD. Patients were matched using 1:1 propensity matching. Primary endpoints including inpatient and outpatient visits were compared between ablation and AAD cohorts in the 4 months-1 year period after index. Secondary endpoints including heart failure, stroke, cardioversion, mortality, and a composite outcome were compared for the 4 months-3 years post-index period in the two groups. Cox-proportional hazards models were estimated for clinical outcomes comparison. RESULTS: A total of 558 patients were matched in the two groups for resource utilization comparison. The average number of cardiovascular (CV)-related outpatient visits in the 4–12 months post-index period were significantly lower in the ablation group versus the AAD group (1.76 vs 3.57, p < .0001). There was no significant difference in all-cause and CV-related inpatient visits and all-cause outpatient visits among the two groups. For secondary endpoints comparison, 615 matched patients in each group emerged. Ablation patients had 38% lower risk of heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, p = 0.0318), 50% lower risk of mortality (HR 0.50, p = 0.0082), and 43% lower risk of experiencing a composite outcome (HR 0.57, p = 0.0009) as compared to AAD treatment cohort. CONCLUSION: AF ablation was associated with significantly lower CV-related outpatient visits, and lower risk of heart failure and mortality versus AAD therapy. BioMed Central 2018-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6223058/ /pubmed/30404603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0946-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jarman, Julian W. E.
Hussain, Wajid
Wong, Tom
Markides, Vias
March, Jamie
Goldstein, Laura
Liao, Ray
Kalsekar, Iftekhar
Chitnis, Abhishek
Khanna, Rahul
Resource use and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug treatment
title Resource use and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug treatment
title_full Resource use and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug treatment
title_fullStr Resource use and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug treatment
title_full_unstemmed Resource use and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug treatment
title_short Resource use and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug treatment
title_sort resource use and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation with ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug treatment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30404603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0946-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jarmanjulianwe resourceuseandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugtreatment
AT hussainwajid resourceuseandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugtreatment
AT wongtom resourceuseandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugtreatment
AT markidesvias resourceuseandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugtreatment
AT marchjamie resourceuseandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugtreatment
AT goldsteinlaura resourceuseandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugtreatment
AT liaoray resourceuseandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugtreatment
AT kalsekariftekhar resourceuseandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugtreatment
AT chitnisabhishek resourceuseandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugtreatment
AT khannarahul resourceuseandclinicaloutcomesinpatientswithatrialfibrillationwithablationversusantiarrhythmicdrugtreatment