Cargando…
Comparison of the Accuracy of Papanicolaou Test Cytology, Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid, and Visual Inspection With Lugol Iodine in Screening for Cervical Neoplasia in Southeast Nigeria
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of Papanicolaou test cytology, visual inspection with 5% acetic acid (VIA), and visual inspection with Lugol iodine (VILI) in the detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional compara...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Clinical Oncology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.17.00127 |
_version_ | 1783369401807929344 |
---|---|
author | Egede, John Ajah, Leonard Ibekwe, Perpetus Agwu, Uzoma Nwizu, Emmanuel Iyare, Festus |
author_facet | Egede, John Ajah, Leonard Ibekwe, Perpetus Agwu, Uzoma Nwizu, Emmanuel Iyare, Festus |
author_sort | Egede, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of Papanicolaou test cytology, visual inspection with 5% acetic acid (VIA), and visual inspection with Lugol iodine (VILI) in the detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional comparative study of 200 consenting participants at the Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki over a 6-month period. All the participants had Papanicolaou test cytology. Subsequently, they were classified into two groups of 100 each through systematic random sampling: group 1 had VIA and group 2 had VILI. Thereafter, all the participants had cervical punch biopsy at the 6 and 12 o’clock cervical positions. Cervical punch biopsy was also done on the suspicious lesions of the cervix irrespective of their positions. The tests of validity of the three methods were calculated using the histology of the biopsy specimen as the gold standard. P value ≤ .05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Among the VIA group, 19 (19%) had cervical epithelial abnormalities on Papanicolaou test cytology, and VIA was positive in 14 (14%). Histology results showed cervical neoplasia in 15 (15%) of the participants. Among the VILI group, 15 (15%) had cervical epithelial abnormalities on Papanicolaou test cytology, and VILI was positive in 19 (19%). Histology results showed cervical neoplasia in 15 (15%) of the participants. There was no significant difference in overall accuracy of Papanicolaou test cytology, VIA, and VILI. The overall accuracy of the Papanicolaou test cytology plus VIA was significantly more than Papanicolaou test cytology alone. CONCLUSION: VIA or VILI can be used as a stand-alone cervical cancer screening test when compared with Papanicolaou test cytology, particularly in resource-limited settings. VIA can also complement Papanicolaou test cytology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6223424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American Society of Clinical Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62234242018-11-13 Comparison of the Accuracy of Papanicolaou Test Cytology, Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid, and Visual Inspection With Lugol Iodine in Screening for Cervical Neoplasia in Southeast Nigeria Egede, John Ajah, Leonard Ibekwe, Perpetus Agwu, Uzoma Nwizu, Emmanuel Iyare, Festus J Glob Oncol Original Reports PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of Papanicolaou test cytology, visual inspection with 5% acetic acid (VIA), and visual inspection with Lugol iodine (VILI) in the detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the cervix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional comparative study of 200 consenting participants at the Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki over a 6-month period. All the participants had Papanicolaou test cytology. Subsequently, they were classified into two groups of 100 each through systematic random sampling: group 1 had VIA and group 2 had VILI. Thereafter, all the participants had cervical punch biopsy at the 6 and 12 o’clock cervical positions. Cervical punch biopsy was also done on the suspicious lesions of the cervix irrespective of their positions. The tests of validity of the three methods were calculated using the histology of the biopsy specimen as the gold standard. P value ≤ .05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Among the VIA group, 19 (19%) had cervical epithelial abnormalities on Papanicolaou test cytology, and VIA was positive in 14 (14%). Histology results showed cervical neoplasia in 15 (15%) of the participants. Among the VILI group, 15 (15%) had cervical epithelial abnormalities on Papanicolaou test cytology, and VILI was positive in 19 (19%). Histology results showed cervical neoplasia in 15 (15%) of the participants. There was no significant difference in overall accuracy of Papanicolaou test cytology, VIA, and VILI. The overall accuracy of the Papanicolaou test cytology plus VIA was significantly more than Papanicolaou test cytology alone. CONCLUSION: VIA or VILI can be used as a stand-alone cervical cancer screening test when compared with Papanicolaou test cytology, particularly in resource-limited settings. VIA can also complement Papanicolaou test cytology. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6223424/ /pubmed/30241249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.17.00127 Text en © 2018 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Reports Egede, John Ajah, Leonard Ibekwe, Perpetus Agwu, Uzoma Nwizu, Emmanuel Iyare, Festus Comparison of the Accuracy of Papanicolaou Test Cytology, Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid, and Visual Inspection With Lugol Iodine in Screening for Cervical Neoplasia in Southeast Nigeria |
title | Comparison of the Accuracy of Papanicolaou Test Cytology, Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid, and Visual Inspection With Lugol Iodine in Screening for Cervical Neoplasia in Southeast Nigeria |
title_full | Comparison of the Accuracy of Papanicolaou Test Cytology, Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid, and Visual Inspection With Lugol Iodine in Screening for Cervical Neoplasia in Southeast Nigeria |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Accuracy of Papanicolaou Test Cytology, Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid, and Visual Inspection With Lugol Iodine in Screening for Cervical Neoplasia in Southeast Nigeria |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Accuracy of Papanicolaou Test Cytology, Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid, and Visual Inspection With Lugol Iodine in Screening for Cervical Neoplasia in Southeast Nigeria |
title_short | Comparison of the Accuracy of Papanicolaou Test Cytology, Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid, and Visual Inspection With Lugol Iodine in Screening for Cervical Neoplasia in Southeast Nigeria |
title_sort | comparison of the accuracy of papanicolaou test cytology, visual inspection with acetic acid, and visual inspection with lugol iodine in screening for cervical neoplasia in southeast nigeria |
topic | Original Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.17.00127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT egedejohn comparisonoftheaccuracyofpapanicolaoutestcytologyvisualinspectionwithaceticacidandvisualinspectionwithlugoliodineinscreeningforcervicalneoplasiainsoutheastnigeria AT ajahleonard comparisonoftheaccuracyofpapanicolaoutestcytologyvisualinspectionwithaceticacidandvisualinspectionwithlugoliodineinscreeningforcervicalneoplasiainsoutheastnigeria AT ibekweperpetus comparisonoftheaccuracyofpapanicolaoutestcytologyvisualinspectionwithaceticacidandvisualinspectionwithlugoliodineinscreeningforcervicalneoplasiainsoutheastnigeria AT agwuuzoma comparisonoftheaccuracyofpapanicolaoutestcytologyvisualinspectionwithaceticacidandvisualinspectionwithlugoliodineinscreeningforcervicalneoplasiainsoutheastnigeria AT nwizuemmanuel comparisonoftheaccuracyofpapanicolaoutestcytologyvisualinspectionwithaceticacidandvisualinspectionwithlugoliodineinscreeningforcervicalneoplasiainsoutheastnigeria AT iyarefestus comparisonoftheaccuracyofpapanicolaoutestcytologyvisualinspectionwithaceticacidandvisualinspectionwithlugoliodineinscreeningforcervicalneoplasiainsoutheastnigeria |