Cargando…

Impact of Geographic Regions on Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From an International Clinical Trials Database

PURPOSE: Health determinants vary according to geographic region and may affect the outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated during clinical trials of targeted therapy. Here, we investigate the overall survival (OS) of patients with mRCC treated in the era of targeted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fay, Andre P., McKay, Rana R., Lin, Xun, Simantov, Ronit, Choueiri, Toni K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.17.00119
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Health determinants vary according to geographic region and may affect the outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated during clinical trials of targeted therapy. Here, we investigate the overall survival (OS) of patients with mRCC treated in the era of targeted therapy by geographic region. METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of patients with mRCC who were treated during phase II or III clinical trials. Clinical characteristics and survival data were collected. Statistical analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test in univariable analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 4,736 patients were included in the analysis. Patient characteristics differed according to geographic region. No statistically significant differences in OS were observed when the United States/Canada (USC) was compared with the following other regions: Latin America, Asia/Oceania/Africa, and Eastern Europe. In a univariable analysis, OS differed among patients enrolled in trials in USC compared with Western Europe (20.3 v 17.4 months; hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.3; P = .015), but it did not differ in a multivariable analysis. All-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were observed more frequently in USC. There were no significant differences in grade 3 to 5 AEs among groups. CONCLUSION: Despite different baseline characteristics, OS was similar among patients enrolled in clinical trials across different geographic regions. Access to clinical trials as well as disease biology, AE reporting, and quality of care may contribute to potential differences in outcomes.