Cargando…

Disparities in Breast, Lung, and Cervical Cancer Trials Worldwide

PURPOSE: As cancer burden has risen worldwide, physicians, patients, and their advocates have become aware that the clinical cancer trial research paradigm is not ubiquitous. Furthermore, the number and characteristics of trials that are registered in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramaswami, Ramya, Paulino, Eduardo, Barrichello, Adriana, Nogueira-Rodrigues, Angelica, Bukowski, Alexandra, St. Louis, Jessica, Goss, Paul E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.17.00226
_version_ 1783369413184978944
author Ramaswami, Ramya
Paulino, Eduardo
Barrichello, Adriana
Nogueira-Rodrigues, Angelica
Bukowski, Alexandra
St. Louis, Jessica
Goss, Paul E.
author_facet Ramaswami, Ramya
Paulino, Eduardo
Barrichello, Adriana
Nogueira-Rodrigues, Angelica
Bukowski, Alexandra
St. Louis, Jessica
Goss, Paul E.
author_sort Ramaswami, Ramya
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: As cancer burden has risen worldwide, physicians, patients, and their advocates have become aware that the clinical cancer trial research paradigm is not ubiquitous. Furthermore, the number and characteristics of trials that are registered in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with that in high-income countries (HICs) are unknown. METHODS: We collected retrospective data on trials for breast, lung, and cervical cancer registered in ClinicalTrials.gov or with the WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform between 2010 and 2017. The data were then classified as trials within LMICs or HICs using definitions from the World Bank. RESULTS: Included in these analyses were 6,710 trials, of which 3,164 (47%) were breast cancer trials, 3,283 (49%) were lung cancer trials, and 263 (4%) were cervical cancer trials. There were 1,951 (29%) trials from LMICs and 4,759 (71%) trials from HICs (P < .001). Although the proportion of phase III trials in HICs versus LMICs was similar (18% v 17%; P = .66), the number of phase I trials in LMICs was significantly lower than that of HICs (20% v 2%; P < .001). For several LMICs with the highest mortality-to-incidence ratios for breast, lung, or cervical cancer, there were no cancer trials registered in the registration data bases searched for this work. CONCLUSION: There are differences in access to cancer clinical trials in LMICs compared with HICs. Several factors, such as excessive cost and a lack of infrastructure and expertise, may explain these differences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6223472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62234722018-11-13 Disparities in Breast, Lung, and Cervical Cancer Trials Worldwide Ramaswami, Ramya Paulino, Eduardo Barrichello, Adriana Nogueira-Rodrigues, Angelica Bukowski, Alexandra St. Louis, Jessica Goss, Paul E. J Glob Oncol Original Reports PURPOSE: As cancer burden has risen worldwide, physicians, patients, and their advocates have become aware that the clinical cancer trial research paradigm is not ubiquitous. Furthermore, the number and characteristics of trials that are registered in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with that in high-income countries (HICs) are unknown. METHODS: We collected retrospective data on trials for breast, lung, and cervical cancer registered in ClinicalTrials.gov or with the WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform between 2010 and 2017. The data were then classified as trials within LMICs or HICs using definitions from the World Bank. RESULTS: Included in these analyses were 6,710 trials, of which 3,164 (47%) were breast cancer trials, 3,283 (49%) were lung cancer trials, and 263 (4%) were cervical cancer trials. There were 1,951 (29%) trials from LMICs and 4,759 (71%) trials from HICs (P < .001). Although the proportion of phase III trials in HICs versus LMICs was similar (18% v 17%; P = .66), the number of phase I trials in LMICs was significantly lower than that of HICs (20% v 2%; P < .001). For several LMICs with the highest mortality-to-incidence ratios for breast, lung, or cervical cancer, there were no cancer trials registered in the registration data bases searched for this work. CONCLUSION: There are differences in access to cancer clinical trials in LMICs compared with HICs. Several factors, such as excessive cost and a lack of infrastructure and expertise, may explain these differences. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6223472/ /pubmed/30241268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.17.00226 Text en © 2018 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Reports
Ramaswami, Ramya
Paulino, Eduardo
Barrichello, Adriana
Nogueira-Rodrigues, Angelica
Bukowski, Alexandra
St. Louis, Jessica
Goss, Paul E.
Disparities in Breast, Lung, and Cervical Cancer Trials Worldwide
title Disparities in Breast, Lung, and Cervical Cancer Trials Worldwide
title_full Disparities in Breast, Lung, and Cervical Cancer Trials Worldwide
title_fullStr Disparities in Breast, Lung, and Cervical Cancer Trials Worldwide
title_full_unstemmed Disparities in Breast, Lung, and Cervical Cancer Trials Worldwide
title_short Disparities in Breast, Lung, and Cervical Cancer Trials Worldwide
title_sort disparities in breast, lung, and cervical cancer trials worldwide
topic Original Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30241268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.17.00226
work_keys_str_mv AT ramaswamiramya disparitiesinbreastlungandcervicalcancertrialsworldwide
AT paulinoeduardo disparitiesinbreastlungandcervicalcancertrialsworldwide
AT barrichelloadriana disparitiesinbreastlungandcervicalcancertrialsworldwide
AT nogueirarodriguesangelica disparitiesinbreastlungandcervicalcancertrialsworldwide
AT bukowskialexandra disparitiesinbreastlungandcervicalcancertrialsworldwide
AT stlouisjessica disparitiesinbreastlungandcervicalcancertrialsworldwide
AT gosspaule disparitiesinbreastlungandcervicalcancertrialsworldwide