Cargando…
Standard Chemoradiation and Conventional Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Is It Still Applicable in the Era of Magnetic Resonance–Based Brachytherapy?
PURPOSE: Recent guidelines recommend magnetic resonance imaging–based brachytherapy (MRBT) for locally advanced cervical cancer. However, its implementation is challenging within the developing world. This article reports the outcomes of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with ch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Clinical Oncology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30085892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.18.00028 |
_version_ | 1783369420760940544 |
---|---|
author | Mittal, Prachi Chopra, Supriya Pant, Sidharth Mahantshetty, Umesh Engineer, Reena Ghosh, Jaya Gupta, Sudeep Ghadi, Yogesh Menachery, Siji Swamidas, Jamema Gurram, Lavanya Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore |
author_facet | Mittal, Prachi Chopra, Supriya Pant, Sidharth Mahantshetty, Umesh Engineer, Reena Ghosh, Jaya Gupta, Sudeep Ghadi, Yogesh Menachery, Siji Swamidas, Jamema Gurram, Lavanya Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore |
author_sort | Mittal, Prachi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Recent guidelines recommend magnetic resonance imaging–based brachytherapy (MRBT) for locally advanced cervical cancer. However, its implementation is challenging within the developing world. This article reports the outcomes of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation and point A–based brachytherapy (BT) using x-ray– or computed tomography–based planning. METHODS: Patients treated between January 2014 and December 2015 were included. Patients underwent x-ray– or computed tomography–based BT planning with an aim to deliver equivalent doses in 2 Gy (EQD2) > 84 Gy(10) to point A while minimizing maximum dose received by rectum or bladder to a point or 2 cc volume to < 75 Gy EQD2 and < 90 Gy EQD2, respectively(.) The impact of known prognostic factors was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 339 patients were evaluated. Median age was 52 (32 to 81) years; 52% of patients had stage IB2 to IIB and 48% had stage III to IVA disease. There was 85% compliance with chemoradiation, and 87% of patients received four or more cycles. Median point A dose was 84 (64.8 to 89.7) Gy. The median rectal and bladder doses were 73.5 (69.6 to 78.4) Gy(3) and 83 (73.2 to 90.0) Gy(3), respectively. At a median follow-up of 28 (4 to 45) months, the 3-year local, disease-free, and overall survival for stage IB to IIB disease was 94.1%, 83.3%, and 82.7%, respectively. The corresponding rates for stage III to IVA were 85.1%, 60.7%, and 69.6%. Grade III to IV proctitis and cystitis were observed in 4.7% and 0% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: This audit demonstrates good 3-year outcomes that are comparable to published MRBT series. Conventional BT with selective use of interstitial needles and MRBT should continue as standard procedures until level-I evidence for MRBT becomes available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6223510 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American Society of Clinical Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62235102018-11-13 Standard Chemoradiation and Conventional Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Is It Still Applicable in the Era of Magnetic Resonance–Based Brachytherapy? Mittal, Prachi Chopra, Supriya Pant, Sidharth Mahantshetty, Umesh Engineer, Reena Ghosh, Jaya Gupta, Sudeep Ghadi, Yogesh Menachery, Siji Swamidas, Jamema Gurram, Lavanya Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore J Glob Oncol Original Reports PURPOSE: Recent guidelines recommend magnetic resonance imaging–based brachytherapy (MRBT) for locally advanced cervical cancer. However, its implementation is challenging within the developing world. This article reports the outcomes of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation and point A–based brachytherapy (BT) using x-ray– or computed tomography–based planning. METHODS: Patients treated between January 2014 and December 2015 were included. Patients underwent x-ray– or computed tomography–based BT planning with an aim to deliver equivalent doses in 2 Gy (EQD2) > 84 Gy(10) to point A while minimizing maximum dose received by rectum or bladder to a point or 2 cc volume to < 75 Gy EQD2 and < 90 Gy EQD2, respectively(.) The impact of known prognostic factors was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 339 patients were evaluated. Median age was 52 (32 to 81) years; 52% of patients had stage IB2 to IIB and 48% had stage III to IVA disease. There was 85% compliance with chemoradiation, and 87% of patients received four or more cycles. Median point A dose was 84 (64.8 to 89.7) Gy. The median rectal and bladder doses were 73.5 (69.6 to 78.4) Gy(3) and 83 (73.2 to 90.0) Gy(3), respectively. At a median follow-up of 28 (4 to 45) months, the 3-year local, disease-free, and overall survival for stage IB to IIB disease was 94.1%, 83.3%, and 82.7%, respectively. The corresponding rates for stage III to IVA were 85.1%, 60.7%, and 69.6%. Grade III to IV proctitis and cystitis were observed in 4.7% and 0% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: This audit demonstrates good 3-year outcomes that are comparable to published MRBT series. Conventional BT with selective use of interstitial needles and MRBT should continue as standard procedures until level-I evidence for MRBT becomes available. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6223510/ /pubmed/30085892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.18.00028 Text en © 2018 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Reports Mittal, Prachi Chopra, Supriya Pant, Sidharth Mahantshetty, Umesh Engineer, Reena Ghosh, Jaya Gupta, Sudeep Ghadi, Yogesh Menachery, Siji Swamidas, Jamema Gurram, Lavanya Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore Standard Chemoradiation and Conventional Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Is It Still Applicable in the Era of Magnetic Resonance–Based Brachytherapy? |
title | Standard Chemoradiation and Conventional Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Is It Still Applicable in the Era of Magnetic Resonance–Based Brachytherapy? |
title_full | Standard Chemoradiation and Conventional Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Is It Still Applicable in the Era of Magnetic Resonance–Based Brachytherapy? |
title_fullStr | Standard Chemoradiation and Conventional Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Is It Still Applicable in the Era of Magnetic Resonance–Based Brachytherapy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Standard Chemoradiation and Conventional Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Is It Still Applicable in the Era of Magnetic Resonance–Based Brachytherapy? |
title_short | Standard Chemoradiation and Conventional Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Is It Still Applicable in the Era of Magnetic Resonance–Based Brachytherapy? |
title_sort | standard chemoradiation and conventional brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: is it still applicable in the era of magnetic resonance–based brachytherapy? |
topic | Original Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30085892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.18.00028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mittalprachi standardchemoradiationandconventionalbrachytherapyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerisitstillapplicableintheeraofmagneticresonancebasedbrachytherapy AT choprasupriya standardchemoradiationandconventionalbrachytherapyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerisitstillapplicableintheeraofmagneticresonancebasedbrachytherapy AT pantsidharth standardchemoradiationandconventionalbrachytherapyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerisitstillapplicableintheeraofmagneticresonancebasedbrachytherapy AT mahantshettyumesh standardchemoradiationandconventionalbrachytherapyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerisitstillapplicableintheeraofmagneticresonancebasedbrachytherapy AT engineerreena standardchemoradiationandconventionalbrachytherapyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerisitstillapplicableintheeraofmagneticresonancebasedbrachytherapy AT ghoshjaya standardchemoradiationandconventionalbrachytherapyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerisitstillapplicableintheeraofmagneticresonancebasedbrachytherapy AT guptasudeep standardchemoradiationandconventionalbrachytherapyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerisitstillapplicableintheeraofmagneticresonancebasedbrachytherapy AT ghadiyogesh standardchemoradiationandconventionalbrachytherapyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerisitstillapplicableintheeraofmagneticresonancebasedbrachytherapy AT menacherysiji standardchemoradiationandconventionalbrachytherapyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerisitstillapplicableintheeraofmagneticresonancebasedbrachytherapy AT swamidasjamema standardchemoradiationandconventionalbrachytherapyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerisitstillapplicableintheeraofmagneticresonancebasedbrachytherapy AT gurramlavanya standardchemoradiationandconventionalbrachytherapyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerisitstillapplicableintheeraofmagneticresonancebasedbrachytherapy AT shrivastavashyamkishore standardchemoradiationandconventionalbrachytherapyforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerisitstillapplicableintheeraofmagneticresonancebasedbrachytherapy |