Cargando…

Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and the Cervical Cancer Care Continuum in Rural Guatemala: A Mixed-Method Analysis

PURPOSE: Cervical cancer is an important cause of mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Although screening technologies continue to improve, systems of care remain fragmented. It is important to better understand factors that affect use of screening services and loss to follow-up along the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Austad, Kirsten, Chary, Anita, Xocop, Sandy Mux, Messmer, Sarah, King, Nora, Carlson, Lauren, Rohloff, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30084698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.17.00228
_version_ 1783369421688930304
author Austad, Kirsten
Chary, Anita
Xocop, Sandy Mux
Messmer, Sarah
King, Nora
Carlson, Lauren
Rohloff, Peter
author_facet Austad, Kirsten
Chary, Anita
Xocop, Sandy Mux
Messmer, Sarah
King, Nora
Carlson, Lauren
Rohloff, Peter
author_sort Austad, Kirsten
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Cervical cancer is an important cause of mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Although screening technologies continue to improve, systems of care remain fragmented. It is important to better understand factors that affect use of screening services and loss to follow-up along the care continuum. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study of a cytology-based screening program in rural Guatemala. A retrospective electronic chart review was performed on data from all patients from 2013 to 2014. We analyzed progression through care and calculated loss–to–follow-up rates. We also analyzed the prior experiences of patients with cervical cancer screening on the basis of self-reported historical data available in the chart review. Structured interviews with a subset of individuals to explore social supports and barriers to screening and engagement in care were conducted at the time of screening. RESULTS: The analysis included 515 women (median age, 36 years). Cytologic screening showed concern for neoplastic changes in 0.83%; half resulted in biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. An additional 9.9% showed severe inflammation. The rate of loss to follow–up was 11.3%. All losses to follow-up occurred for severe inflammation, not for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Historical data showed that 73% of the cohort had previously been screened and had high levels of loss to follow-up (57.4%). Qualitative interviews revealed factors that promoted loss to follow-up; these included cost, lack of social supports, transportation, distrust in public facilities, long turn-around times, and failure to return test results or offer follow-up treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these quantitative and qualitative results highlight the need for cervical cancer screening programs in Guatemala to improve uptake of screening services by eligible women and to improve follow-up after a first abnormal screen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6223515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62235152018-11-13 Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and the Cervical Cancer Care Continuum in Rural Guatemala: A Mixed-Method Analysis Austad, Kirsten Chary, Anita Xocop, Sandy Mux Messmer, Sarah King, Nora Carlson, Lauren Rohloff, Peter J Glob Oncol Original Report PURPOSE: Cervical cancer is an important cause of mortality in low- and middle-income countries. Although screening technologies continue to improve, systems of care remain fragmented. It is important to better understand factors that affect use of screening services and loss to follow-up along the care continuum. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study of a cytology-based screening program in rural Guatemala. A retrospective electronic chart review was performed on data from all patients from 2013 to 2014. We analyzed progression through care and calculated loss–to–follow-up rates. We also analyzed the prior experiences of patients with cervical cancer screening on the basis of self-reported historical data available in the chart review. Structured interviews with a subset of individuals to explore social supports and barriers to screening and engagement in care were conducted at the time of screening. RESULTS: The analysis included 515 women (median age, 36 years). Cytologic screening showed concern for neoplastic changes in 0.83%; half resulted in biopsy-proven cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. An additional 9.9% showed severe inflammation. The rate of loss to follow–up was 11.3%. All losses to follow-up occurred for severe inflammation, not for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Historical data showed that 73% of the cohort had previously been screened and had high levels of loss to follow-up (57.4%). Qualitative interviews revealed factors that promoted loss to follow-up; these included cost, lack of social supports, transportation, distrust in public facilities, long turn-around times, and failure to return test results or offer follow-up treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these quantitative and qualitative results highlight the need for cervical cancer screening programs in Guatemala to improve uptake of screening services by eligible women and to improve follow-up after a first abnormal screen. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6223515/ /pubmed/30084698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.17.00228 Text en © 2018 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Report
Austad, Kirsten
Chary, Anita
Xocop, Sandy Mux
Messmer, Sarah
King, Nora
Carlson, Lauren
Rohloff, Peter
Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and the Cervical Cancer Care Continuum in Rural Guatemala: A Mixed-Method Analysis
title Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and the Cervical Cancer Care Continuum in Rural Guatemala: A Mixed-Method Analysis
title_full Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and the Cervical Cancer Care Continuum in Rural Guatemala: A Mixed-Method Analysis
title_fullStr Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and the Cervical Cancer Care Continuum in Rural Guatemala: A Mixed-Method Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and the Cervical Cancer Care Continuum in Rural Guatemala: A Mixed-Method Analysis
title_short Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and the Cervical Cancer Care Continuum in Rural Guatemala: A Mixed-Method Analysis
title_sort barriers to cervical cancer screening and the cervical cancer care continuum in rural guatemala: a mixed-method analysis
topic Original Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30084698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.17.00228
work_keys_str_mv AT austadkirsten barrierstocervicalcancerscreeningandthecervicalcancercarecontinuuminruralguatemalaamixedmethodanalysis
AT charyanita barrierstocervicalcancerscreeningandthecervicalcancercarecontinuuminruralguatemalaamixedmethodanalysis
AT xocopsandymux barrierstocervicalcancerscreeningandthecervicalcancercarecontinuuminruralguatemalaamixedmethodanalysis
AT messmersarah barrierstocervicalcancerscreeningandthecervicalcancercarecontinuuminruralguatemalaamixedmethodanalysis
AT kingnora barrierstocervicalcancerscreeningandthecervicalcancercarecontinuuminruralguatemalaamixedmethodanalysis
AT carlsonlauren barrierstocervicalcancerscreeningandthecervicalcancercarecontinuuminruralguatemalaamixedmethodanalysis
AT rohloffpeter barrierstocervicalcancerscreeningandthecervicalcancercarecontinuuminruralguatemalaamixedmethodanalysis