Cargando…

Consensus document on the progression and treatment response criteria in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous group of low incidence neoplasms characterized by a low proliferative activity and slow growth. Their response to targeted therapies is heterogeneous and often does not lead to tumor shrinkage. Thus, evaluation of the therapeu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merino-Casabiel, X., Aller, J., Arbizu, J., García-Figueiras, R., González, C., Grande, E., Jiménez-Fonseca, P., Sevilla, M. I., Capdevila, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29766455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-018-1881-9
_version_ 1783369451583832064
author Merino-Casabiel, X.
Aller, J.
Arbizu, J.
García-Figueiras, R.
González, C.
Grande, E.
Jiménez-Fonseca, P.
Sevilla, M. I.
Capdevila, J.
author_facet Merino-Casabiel, X.
Aller, J.
Arbizu, J.
García-Figueiras, R.
González, C.
Grande, E.
Jiménez-Fonseca, P.
Sevilla, M. I.
Capdevila, J.
author_sort Merino-Casabiel, X.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous group of low incidence neoplasms characterized by a low proliferative activity and slow growth. Their response to targeted therapies is heterogeneous and often does not lead to tumor shrinkage. Thus, evaluation of the therapeutic response should differ from other kind of tumors. METHODS: To answer relevant questions about which techniques are best in the assessment of progression or treatment response a RAND/UCLA-based consensus process was implemented. Relevant clinical questions were listed followed by a systematic search of the literature. The expert panel answered all questions with recommendations, combining available evidence and expert opinion. Recommendations were validated through a questionnaire and a participatory meeting. RESULTS: Expert recommendations regarding imaging tools for tumor assessment and evaluation of progression were agreed upon. Available imaging techniques were reviewed and recommendations for best patient monitoring practice and the best way to evaluate treatment response were formulated. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12094-018-1881-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6223716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62237162018-11-18 Consensus document on the progression and treatment response criteria in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors Merino-Casabiel, X. Aller, J. Arbizu, J. García-Figueiras, R. González, C. Grande, E. Jiménez-Fonseca, P. Sevilla, M. I. Capdevila, J. Clin Transl Oncol Research Article PURPOSE: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous group of low incidence neoplasms characterized by a low proliferative activity and slow growth. Their response to targeted therapies is heterogeneous and often does not lead to tumor shrinkage. Thus, evaluation of the therapeutic response should differ from other kind of tumors. METHODS: To answer relevant questions about which techniques are best in the assessment of progression or treatment response a RAND/UCLA-based consensus process was implemented. Relevant clinical questions were listed followed by a systematic search of the literature. The expert panel answered all questions with recommendations, combining available evidence and expert opinion. Recommendations were validated through a questionnaire and a participatory meeting. RESULTS: Expert recommendations regarding imaging tools for tumor assessment and evaluation of progression were agreed upon. Available imaging techniques were reviewed and recommendations for best patient monitoring practice and the best way to evaluate treatment response were formulated. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12094-018-1881-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-05-15 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6223716/ /pubmed/29766455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-018-1881-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Merino-Casabiel, X.
Aller, J.
Arbizu, J.
García-Figueiras, R.
González, C.
Grande, E.
Jiménez-Fonseca, P.
Sevilla, M. I.
Capdevila, J.
Consensus document on the progression and treatment response criteria in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
title Consensus document on the progression and treatment response criteria in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
title_full Consensus document on the progression and treatment response criteria in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
title_fullStr Consensus document on the progression and treatment response criteria in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
title_full_unstemmed Consensus document on the progression and treatment response criteria in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
title_short Consensus document on the progression and treatment response criteria in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
title_sort consensus document on the progression and treatment response criteria in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29766455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12094-018-1881-9
work_keys_str_mv AT merinocasabielx consensusdocumentontheprogressionandtreatmentresponsecriteriaingastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumors
AT allerj consensusdocumentontheprogressionandtreatmentresponsecriteriaingastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumors
AT arbizuj consensusdocumentontheprogressionandtreatmentresponsecriteriaingastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumors
AT garciafigueirasr consensusdocumentontheprogressionandtreatmentresponsecriteriaingastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumors
AT gonzalezc consensusdocumentontheprogressionandtreatmentresponsecriteriaingastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumors
AT grandee consensusdocumentontheprogressionandtreatmentresponsecriteriaingastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumors
AT jimenezfonsecap consensusdocumentontheprogressionandtreatmentresponsecriteriaingastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumors
AT sevillami consensusdocumentontheprogressionandtreatmentresponsecriteriaingastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumors
AT capdevilaj consensusdocumentontheprogressionandtreatmentresponsecriteriaingastroenteropancreaticneuroendocrinetumors