Cargando…
Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement
Different resilience concepts have different assumptions about system dynamics, which has implications for resilience-based environmental risk and impact assessment. Engineering resilience (recovery) dominates in the risk assessment literature but this definition does not account for the possibility...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30357430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-018-2467-5 |
_version_ | 1783369487090712576 |
---|---|
author | Angeler, David G. Allen, Craig R. Garmestani, Ahjond Pope, Kevin L. Twidwell, Dirac Bundschuh, Mirco |
author_facet | Angeler, David G. Allen, Craig R. Garmestani, Ahjond Pope, Kevin L. Twidwell, Dirac Bundschuh, Mirco |
author_sort | Angeler, David G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Different resilience concepts have different assumptions about system dynamics, which has implications for resilience-based environmental risk and impact assessment. Engineering resilience (recovery) dominates in the risk assessment literature but this definition does not account for the possibility of ecosystems to exist in multiple regimes. In this paper we discuss resilience concepts and quantification methods. Specifically, we discuss when a system fails to show engineering resilience after disturbances, indicating a shift to a potentially undesired regime. We show quantification methods that can assess the stability of this new regime to inform managers about possibilities to transform the system to a more desired regime. We point out the usefulness of an adaptive inference, modelling and management approach that is based on reiterative testing of hypothesis. This process facilitates learning about, and reduces uncertainty arising from risk and impact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6223862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62238622018-11-19 Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement Angeler, David G. Allen, Craig R. Garmestani, Ahjond Pope, Kevin L. Twidwell, Dirac Bundschuh, Mirco Bull Environ Contam Toxicol Perspective Different resilience concepts have different assumptions about system dynamics, which has implications for resilience-based environmental risk and impact assessment. Engineering resilience (recovery) dominates in the risk assessment literature but this definition does not account for the possibility of ecosystems to exist in multiple regimes. In this paper we discuss resilience concepts and quantification methods. Specifically, we discuss when a system fails to show engineering resilience after disturbances, indicating a shift to a potentially undesired regime. We show quantification methods that can assess the stability of this new regime to inform managers about possibilities to transform the system to a more desired regime. We point out the usefulness of an adaptive inference, modelling and management approach that is based on reiterative testing of hypothesis. This process facilitates learning about, and reduces uncertainty arising from risk and impact. Springer US 2018-10-24 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6223862/ /pubmed/30357430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-018-2467-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Perspective Angeler, David G. Allen, Craig R. Garmestani, Ahjond Pope, Kevin L. Twidwell, Dirac Bundschuh, Mirco Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement |
title | Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement |
title_full | Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement |
title_fullStr | Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement |
title_full_unstemmed | Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement |
title_short | Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement |
title_sort | resilience in environmental risk and impact assessment: concepts and measurement |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30357430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-018-2467-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT angelerdavidg resilienceinenvironmentalriskandimpactassessmentconceptsandmeasurement AT allencraigr resilienceinenvironmentalriskandimpactassessmentconceptsandmeasurement AT garmestaniahjond resilienceinenvironmentalriskandimpactassessmentconceptsandmeasurement AT popekevinl resilienceinenvironmentalriskandimpactassessmentconceptsandmeasurement AT twidwelldirac resilienceinenvironmentalriskandimpactassessmentconceptsandmeasurement AT bundschuhmirco resilienceinenvironmentalriskandimpactassessmentconceptsandmeasurement |