Cargando…

Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement

Different resilience concepts have different assumptions about system dynamics, which has implications for resilience-based environmental risk and impact assessment. Engineering resilience (recovery) dominates in the risk assessment literature but this definition does not account for the possibility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Angeler, David G., Allen, Craig R., Garmestani, Ahjond, Pope, Kevin L., Twidwell, Dirac, Bundschuh, Mirco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30357430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-018-2467-5
_version_ 1783369487090712576
author Angeler, David G.
Allen, Craig R.
Garmestani, Ahjond
Pope, Kevin L.
Twidwell, Dirac
Bundschuh, Mirco
author_facet Angeler, David G.
Allen, Craig R.
Garmestani, Ahjond
Pope, Kevin L.
Twidwell, Dirac
Bundschuh, Mirco
author_sort Angeler, David G.
collection PubMed
description Different resilience concepts have different assumptions about system dynamics, which has implications for resilience-based environmental risk and impact assessment. Engineering resilience (recovery) dominates in the risk assessment literature but this definition does not account for the possibility of ecosystems to exist in multiple regimes. In this paper we discuss resilience concepts and quantification methods. Specifically, we discuss when a system fails to show engineering resilience after disturbances, indicating a shift to a potentially undesired regime. We show quantification methods that can assess the stability of this new regime to inform managers about possibilities to transform the system to a more desired regime. We point out the usefulness of an adaptive inference, modelling and management approach that is based on reiterative testing of hypothesis. This process facilitates learning about, and reduces uncertainty arising from risk and impact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6223862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62238622018-11-19 Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement Angeler, David G. Allen, Craig R. Garmestani, Ahjond Pope, Kevin L. Twidwell, Dirac Bundschuh, Mirco Bull Environ Contam Toxicol Perspective Different resilience concepts have different assumptions about system dynamics, which has implications for resilience-based environmental risk and impact assessment. Engineering resilience (recovery) dominates in the risk assessment literature but this definition does not account for the possibility of ecosystems to exist in multiple regimes. In this paper we discuss resilience concepts and quantification methods. Specifically, we discuss when a system fails to show engineering resilience after disturbances, indicating a shift to a potentially undesired regime. We show quantification methods that can assess the stability of this new regime to inform managers about possibilities to transform the system to a more desired regime. We point out the usefulness of an adaptive inference, modelling and management approach that is based on reiterative testing of hypothesis. This process facilitates learning about, and reduces uncertainty arising from risk and impact. Springer US 2018-10-24 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6223862/ /pubmed/30357430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-018-2467-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Perspective
Angeler, David G.
Allen, Craig R.
Garmestani, Ahjond
Pope, Kevin L.
Twidwell, Dirac
Bundschuh, Mirco
Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement
title Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement
title_full Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement
title_fullStr Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement
title_full_unstemmed Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement
title_short Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement
title_sort resilience in environmental risk and impact assessment: concepts and measurement
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30357430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-018-2467-5
work_keys_str_mv AT angelerdavidg resilienceinenvironmentalriskandimpactassessmentconceptsandmeasurement
AT allencraigr resilienceinenvironmentalriskandimpactassessmentconceptsandmeasurement
AT garmestaniahjond resilienceinenvironmentalriskandimpactassessmentconceptsandmeasurement
AT popekevinl resilienceinenvironmentalriskandimpactassessmentconceptsandmeasurement
AT twidwelldirac resilienceinenvironmentalriskandimpactassessmentconceptsandmeasurement
AT bundschuhmirco resilienceinenvironmentalriskandimpactassessmentconceptsandmeasurement