Cargando…

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- versus Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors for Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia

INTRODUCTION: Short- and long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are approved for the reduction of febrile neutropenia. A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs reporting the use of G-CSFs following chemotherapy tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cornes, Paul, Gascon, Pere, Chan, Stephen, Hameed, Khalid, Mitchell, Catherine R., Field, Polly, Latymer, Mark, Arantes, Luiz H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30298233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0798-6
_version_ 1783369516027215872
author Cornes, Paul
Gascon, Pere
Chan, Stephen
Hameed, Khalid
Mitchell, Catherine R.
Field, Polly
Latymer, Mark
Arantes, Luiz H.
author_facet Cornes, Paul
Gascon, Pere
Chan, Stephen
Hameed, Khalid
Mitchell, Catherine R.
Field, Polly
Latymer, Mark
Arantes, Luiz H.
author_sort Cornes, Paul
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Short- and long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are approved for the reduction of febrile neutropenia. A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs reporting the use of G-CSFs following chemotherapy treatment. METHODS: Medline(®)/Medline in-process, Embase(®), and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 2003 and June 2016. A hand-search of relevant conference proceedings was conducted for meetings held between 2012 and 2016. Eligible studies were restricted to those reporting a direct, head-to-head comparison of short- versus long-acting G-CSFs for reduction of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. Risk-of-bias assessments were performed for full publications only. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 4044 articles for electronic screening. Thirty-six publications were evaluated for the meta-analysis: 11 of 12 RCTs and 2 of 24 non-RCTs administered doses of the short-acting G-CSF filgrastim for ≥ 7 days. In RCT studies, there was no statistically significant difference in outcomes of interest between short- and long-acting G-CSFs. In non-RCTs, the overall risk was lower with long-acting G-CSF than with short-acting G-CSF for incidence of febrile neutropenia [overall relative risk (RR) = 0.67, P  = 0.023], hospitalizations (overall RR = 0.68, P  < 0.05), and chemotherapy dose delays (overall RR = 0.68, P  = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the weight of evidence from RCTs indicates little difference in efficacy between the short- and long-acting G-CSFs if dosed according to recommended guidelines. There is some evidence for greater efficacy for long-acting G-CSFs in non-RCTs, which may be a result of under-dosing of short-acting G-CSFs in general practice in real-world usage. FUNDING: Hospira Inc, which was acquired by Pfizer Inc in September 2015, and Pfizer Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0798-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6223993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62239932018-11-19 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- versus Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors for Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Cornes, Paul Gascon, Pere Chan, Stephen Hameed, Khalid Mitchell, Catherine R. Field, Polly Latymer, Mark Arantes, Luiz H. Adv Ther Review INTRODUCTION: Short- and long-acting granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are approved for the reduction of febrile neutropenia. A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs reporting the use of G-CSFs following chemotherapy treatment. METHODS: Medline(®)/Medline in-process, Embase(®), and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 2003 and June 2016. A hand-search of relevant conference proceedings was conducted for meetings held between 2012 and 2016. Eligible studies were restricted to those reporting a direct, head-to-head comparison of short- versus long-acting G-CSFs for reduction of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. Risk-of-bias assessments were performed for full publications only. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 4044 articles for electronic screening. Thirty-six publications were evaluated for the meta-analysis: 11 of 12 RCTs and 2 of 24 non-RCTs administered doses of the short-acting G-CSF filgrastim for ≥ 7 days. In RCT studies, there was no statistically significant difference in outcomes of interest between short- and long-acting G-CSFs. In non-RCTs, the overall risk was lower with long-acting G-CSF than with short-acting G-CSF for incidence of febrile neutropenia [overall relative risk (RR) = 0.67, P  = 0.023], hospitalizations (overall RR = 0.68, P  < 0.05), and chemotherapy dose delays (overall RR = 0.68, P  = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the weight of evidence from RCTs indicates little difference in efficacy between the short- and long-acting G-CSFs if dosed according to recommended guidelines. There is some evidence for greater efficacy for long-acting G-CSFs in non-RCTs, which may be a result of under-dosing of short-acting G-CSFs in general practice in real-world usage. FUNDING: Hospira Inc, which was acquired by Pfizer Inc in September 2015, and Pfizer Inc. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-018-0798-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2018-10-08 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6223993/ /pubmed/30298233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0798-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018, corrected publication October/2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Cornes, Paul
Gascon, Pere
Chan, Stephen
Hameed, Khalid
Mitchell, Catherine R.
Field, Polly
Latymer, Mark
Arantes, Luiz H.
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- versus Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors for Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia
title Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- versus Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors for Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia
title_full Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- versus Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors for Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia
title_fullStr Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- versus Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors for Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- versus Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors for Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia
title_short Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Short- versus Long-Acting Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors for Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of short- versus long-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for reduction of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30298233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0798-6
work_keys_str_mv AT cornespaul systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshortversuslongactinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsforreductionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropenia
AT gasconpere systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshortversuslongactinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsforreductionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropenia
AT chanstephen systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshortversuslongactinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsforreductionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropenia
AT hameedkhalid systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshortversuslongactinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsforreductionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropenia
AT mitchellcatheriner systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshortversuslongactinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsforreductionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropenia
AT fieldpolly systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshortversuslongactinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsforreductionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropenia
AT latymermark systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshortversuslongactinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsforreductionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropenia
AT arantesluizh systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofshortversuslongactinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorsforreductionofchemotherapyinducedfebrileneutropenia