Cargando…
A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles
The galling habit represents a complex type of interaction between insects and plants, ranging from antagonism to mutualism. The obligate pollination mutualism between Ficus and fig wasps relies strongly on the induction of galls in Ficus flowers, where wasps' offspring develop. Even though gal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30408087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207051 |
_version_ | 1783369535984762880 |
---|---|
author | Elias, Larissa G. Silva, Denise B. Silva, Ricardo Peng, Yan-Qiong Yang, Da-Rong Lopes, Norberto P. Pereira, Rodrigo A. S. |
author_facet | Elias, Larissa G. Silva, Denise B. Silva, Ricardo Peng, Yan-Qiong Yang, Da-Rong Lopes, Norberto P. Pereira, Rodrigo A. S. |
author_sort | Elias, Larissa G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The galling habit represents a complex type of interaction between insects and plants, ranging from antagonism to mutualism. The obligate pollination mutualism between Ficus and fig wasps relies strongly on the induction of galls in Ficus flowers, where wasps' offspring develop. Even though gall induction plays an important role in many insect-plant interactions, the mechanisms that trigger gall formation are still not completely known. Using a fingerprinting approach, we show here that venom protein profiles from galling fig wasps differ from the venom profiles of non-galling species, suggesting the secretion plays different roles according to the type of interaction it is involved in. Each studied cleptoparasitic species had a distinct venom profile, suggesting that cleptoparasitism in fig wasps covers a vast diversity of molecular interactions. Fig wasp venoms are mainly composed of peptides. No low molecular weight compounds were detected by UPLC-DAD-MS, suggesting that such compounds (e.g., IAA and cytokinines) are not involved in gall induction. The differences in venom composition observed between galling and non-galling fig wasp species bring new perspectives to the study of gall induction processes and the role of insect secretions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6224076 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62240762018-11-19 A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles Elias, Larissa G. Silva, Denise B. Silva, Ricardo Peng, Yan-Qiong Yang, Da-Rong Lopes, Norberto P. Pereira, Rodrigo A. S. PLoS One Research Article The galling habit represents a complex type of interaction between insects and plants, ranging from antagonism to mutualism. The obligate pollination mutualism between Ficus and fig wasps relies strongly on the induction of galls in Ficus flowers, where wasps' offspring develop. Even though gall induction plays an important role in many insect-plant interactions, the mechanisms that trigger gall formation are still not completely known. Using a fingerprinting approach, we show here that venom protein profiles from galling fig wasps differ from the venom profiles of non-galling species, suggesting the secretion plays different roles according to the type of interaction it is involved in. Each studied cleptoparasitic species had a distinct venom profile, suggesting that cleptoparasitism in fig wasps covers a vast diversity of molecular interactions. Fig wasp venoms are mainly composed of peptides. No low molecular weight compounds were detected by UPLC-DAD-MS, suggesting that such compounds (e.g., IAA and cytokinines) are not involved in gall induction. The differences in venom composition observed between galling and non-galling fig wasp species bring new perspectives to the study of gall induction processes and the role of insect secretions. Public Library of Science 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6224076/ /pubmed/30408087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207051 Text en © 2018 Elias et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Elias, Larissa G. Silva, Denise B. Silva, Ricardo Peng, Yan-Qiong Yang, Da-Rong Lopes, Norberto P. Pereira, Rodrigo A. S. A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles |
title | A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles |
title_full | A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles |
title_fullStr | A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles |
title_short | A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles |
title_sort | comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224076/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30408087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eliaslarissag acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles AT silvadeniseb acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles AT silvaricardo acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles AT pengyanqiong acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles AT yangdarong acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles AT lopesnorbertop acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles AT pereirarodrigoas acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles AT eliaslarissag comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles AT silvadeniseb comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles AT silvaricardo comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles AT pengyanqiong comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles AT yangdarong comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles AT lopesnorbertop comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles AT pereirarodrigoas comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles |