Cargando…

A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles

The galling habit represents a complex type of interaction between insects and plants, ranging from antagonism to mutualism. The obligate pollination mutualism between Ficus and fig wasps relies strongly on the induction of galls in Ficus flowers, where wasps' offspring develop. Even though gal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elias, Larissa G., Silva, Denise B., Silva, Ricardo, Peng, Yan-Qiong, Yang, Da-Rong, Lopes, Norberto P., Pereira, Rodrigo A. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30408087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207051
_version_ 1783369535984762880
author Elias, Larissa G.
Silva, Denise B.
Silva, Ricardo
Peng, Yan-Qiong
Yang, Da-Rong
Lopes, Norberto P.
Pereira, Rodrigo A. S.
author_facet Elias, Larissa G.
Silva, Denise B.
Silva, Ricardo
Peng, Yan-Qiong
Yang, Da-Rong
Lopes, Norberto P.
Pereira, Rodrigo A. S.
author_sort Elias, Larissa G.
collection PubMed
description The galling habit represents a complex type of interaction between insects and plants, ranging from antagonism to mutualism. The obligate pollination mutualism between Ficus and fig wasps relies strongly on the induction of galls in Ficus flowers, where wasps' offspring develop. Even though gall induction plays an important role in many insect-plant interactions, the mechanisms that trigger gall formation are still not completely known. Using a fingerprinting approach, we show here that venom protein profiles from galling fig wasps differ from the venom profiles of non-galling species, suggesting the secretion plays different roles according to the type of interaction it is involved in. Each studied cleptoparasitic species had a distinct venom profile, suggesting that cleptoparasitism in fig wasps covers a vast diversity of molecular interactions. Fig wasp venoms are mainly composed of peptides. No low molecular weight compounds were detected by UPLC-DAD-MS, suggesting that such compounds (e.g., IAA and cytokinines) are not involved in gall induction. The differences in venom composition observed between galling and non-galling fig wasp species bring new perspectives to the study of gall induction processes and the role of insect secretions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6224076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62240762018-11-19 A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles Elias, Larissa G. Silva, Denise B. Silva, Ricardo Peng, Yan-Qiong Yang, Da-Rong Lopes, Norberto P. Pereira, Rodrigo A. S. PLoS One Research Article The galling habit represents a complex type of interaction between insects and plants, ranging from antagonism to mutualism. The obligate pollination mutualism between Ficus and fig wasps relies strongly on the induction of galls in Ficus flowers, where wasps' offspring develop. Even though gall induction plays an important role in many insect-plant interactions, the mechanisms that trigger gall formation are still not completely known. Using a fingerprinting approach, we show here that venom protein profiles from galling fig wasps differ from the venom profiles of non-galling species, suggesting the secretion plays different roles according to the type of interaction it is involved in. Each studied cleptoparasitic species had a distinct venom profile, suggesting that cleptoparasitism in fig wasps covers a vast diversity of molecular interactions. Fig wasp venoms are mainly composed of peptides. No low molecular weight compounds were detected by UPLC-DAD-MS, suggesting that such compounds (e.g., IAA and cytokinines) are not involved in gall induction. The differences in venom composition observed between galling and non-galling fig wasp species bring new perspectives to the study of gall induction processes and the role of insect secretions. Public Library of Science 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6224076/ /pubmed/30408087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207051 Text en © 2018 Elias et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Elias, Larissa G.
Silva, Denise B.
Silva, Ricardo
Peng, Yan-Qiong
Yang, Da-Rong
Lopes, Norberto P.
Pereira, Rodrigo A. S.
A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles
title A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles
title_full A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles
title_fullStr A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles
title_full_unstemmed A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles
title_short A comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles
title_sort comparative venomic fingerprinting approach reveals that galling and non-galling fig wasp species have different venom profiles
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6224076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30408087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207051
work_keys_str_mv AT eliaslarissag acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles
AT silvadeniseb acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles
AT silvaricardo acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles
AT pengyanqiong acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles
AT yangdarong acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles
AT lopesnorbertop acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles
AT pereirarodrigoas acomparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles
AT eliaslarissag comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles
AT silvadeniseb comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles
AT silvaricardo comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles
AT pengyanqiong comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles
AT yangdarong comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles
AT lopesnorbertop comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles
AT pereirarodrigoas comparativevenomicfingerprintingapproachrevealsthatgallingandnongallingfigwaspspecieshavedifferentvenomprofiles